49. Memorandum From Director of Central Intelligence Turner1

MEMORANDUM FOR

  • The President
  • The Vice President
  • The Secretary of State
  • The Secretary of Defense
  • The National Security Advisor

On Tuesday2 we discussed the pros and cons of the Shah’s departure to some country other than Iran. I have since asked the [less than 1 line not declassified] and Iranian experts to articulate their views on this succinctly. The result is attached.

I agree with their views, though I am less persuaded that the students in the embassy may act independently of Khomeini. The initial debriefings of our 13 released hostages seem to indicate a close loyalty to Khomeini on the part of the student captors.3

Stansfield Turner4
[Page 125]

Attachment

Memorandum Prepared in the Central Intelligence Agency5

SUBJECT

  • Dangers if the Shah Leaves the US

I. We are concerned that an early departure of the Shah from the US would increase the risks faced by the hostages.

A. The present tenuous equilibrium in the hostage situation would be broken by the Shah’s departure, especially if it occurs in the emotional religious mourning period over the next four weeks.

—Early on, such a move might have been interpreted by the captors and the Khomeini regime as an act of good faith by the US.

—Now, it would increase their frustration over their inability to bring the Shah and the US to account for past actions and to prevent future US/pro-Shah involvement in Iranian affairs.

B. The captors have been operating in a very well organized manner, but we think they might split over how to react to what they would see as a US effort to circumvent their rightful claims. Individually or as a group, they might over-react.

—We believe their public announcements show a significant degree of tension over possible US retaliatory moves against them.

—As little as a single frustrated captor’s angry outburst or blow (or a slight provocation by a hostage) might spark a disintegration of the group’s internal control that could lead to abuse of the hostages.

C. As the captors see it, the US will have given an absolute no to their demands that the Shah be returned to Iran.

D. Some, if not all, will also see his departure as the first step in a new US attempt to overthrow the Iranian revolution.

E. At the very least, the Shah’s departure is likely to precipitate trial of the hostages.

—Despite a statement on 20 November by a government spokesman that the Revolutionary Court would [not] conduct any trial, it is not certain that the Khomeini regime could easily take control of the hostages from their captors.

Khomeini apparently had some difficulty in arranging the release of the thirteen women and blacks.

[Page 126]

—Any effort by the regime to remove the hostages remaining on the compound from their captors’ control would be seen by the latter as indicative of the regime’s lack of trust in them and even of its intention eventually to compromise with the US.

II. We believe the group at the Embassy, and possibly Khomeini and some of his most influential advisors, would not now back off under any circumstances short of a US agreement to return the Shah.

A. In our opinion the captors’ shift of emphasis in their statements to US espionage in Iran suggests that they now realize that the US will not meet their demands and that they are trying to force a complete severance of Iran-US contacts.

B. Consequently, the captors are likely to underscore further their “proof” of the “guilt” of these particular individuals held as hostages.

C. [1 paragraph (6 lines) not declassified]

D. [1 paragraph (7½ lines) not declassified]

—[1 paragraph (4 lines) not declassified]

—[1 paragraph (4 lines) not declassified]

III. Circumstances of the Shah’s departure could modify the reaction in Iran—but probably not change it fundamentally.

A. His removal to Mexico would be a lesser provocation than his arrival in, or stated intention to go later to Egypt, which has actively opposed the Khomeini regime.

B. Statements by the Shah permanently renouncing any Pahlavi claims to power and assets in Iran, and/or offering to account for or return some assets would be generally disbelieved and create far less impact than if they had been forthcoming in the immediate aftermath of the Embassy takeover.

C. The coincidence of the Shah’s departure with the highly emotional period of Moharram, the Shia time of mourning in commemoration of an important early martyr, is likely to intensify reactions by the Khomeini regime, the captors, and the populace to his move.

  1. Source: Central Intelligence Agency, Office of the Director of Central Intelligence, Job 81M00919R: Executive Registry Subject Files (1976–1979), Box 14, Folder 11: C–372 Iran. Secret.
  2. November 20.
  3. See Document 45.
  4. Printed from a copy with this typed signature and an indication that Turner signed the original.
  5. Secret; Noforn.