80. Memorandum From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Scowcroft) to President Ford1

SUBJECT

  • Criteria for Approving Covert Action Operations

The Operations Advisory Group (OAG) has developed a statement of criteria to facilitate the determination of the types of covert action operations authorized under your first Presidential Finding (Tab A).

You will recall that in your first Presidential Finding, required by Section 662 of the Foreign Assistance Act,2 [3 lines not declassified]. This proposed statement of criteria reflects our experience in carry[Page 269]ing out your wishes, including the provisions of your Executive Order 11905 concerning foreign intelligence activities. The purpose of the proposed criteria is to eliminate ambiguity by defining your intent more precisely.

The first pages of the criteria statement review pertinent legal and authorizing provisions, [1½ lines not declassified]. In this connection, we have explained what we understand to be your intent in making [less than 1 line not declassified] (paragraph 7). Paragraph 8 describes procedures whereby CIA may check to insure that tasks [less than 1 line not declassified] are consonant with U.S. policy. Paragraph 9 cites considerations in determining when an activity previously authorized by a Presidential Finding has undergone a “significant change” or resulted in a “new initiative” which would require a new Presidential Finding. Paragraph 10 cites operations which require OAG review and approval and Presidential Findings. Paragraph 11 requires reports to the OAG on those routine activities authorized by [less than 1 line not declassified] Presidential Finding.

I believe these criteria would clarify and amplify in an area where there has been some confusion and would facilitate the OAG handling of the responsibilities you assigned it in Executive Order 11905. If you accept the unanimous recommendation of the OAG members and observers that you approve the criteria, I will distribute them as an annex to my operating guidelines for the OAG.

Recommendation:

That you approve the criteria at Tab A.3

Secretary Kissinger, Secretary Rumsfeld, Attorney General Levi, Brent Scowcroft, James Lynn, George Bush and General George Brown concur.

Tab A

Statement Prepared by the Operations Advisory Group4

SPECIAL ACTIVITY REVIEW AND APPROVAL CRITERIA

1. The purpose of this paper is to describe those “special activities” that must be reviewed by the Operations Advisory Group (OAG) either [Page 270] because they require a Presidential Finding and reports pursuant to Section 662 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, or because they involve significant changes in previously approved “special activities.”

2. Under Section 3(c) of Executive Order 11905 (19 [18] February 1976), it is the function of the OAG, the successor to the 40 Committee, to

consider and develop a policy recommendation . . . for the President prior to his decision on each special activity in support of national foreign policy objectives

and

[c]onduct periodic reviews of programs previously considered by the Operations Group.5

3. “Special activities in support of national foreign policy objectives” are defined by Section 2(c) of Executive Order 11905 to mean:

activities, other than the collection and production of intelligence and related support functions, designed to further official United States programs and policies abroad which are planned and executed so that the role of the United States Government is not apparent or publicly acknowledged.

Annotations of Executive Order 11905 (10 March 1976)6 define “special activities in support of national foreign policy objectives,” to mean covert action.

4. The Chairman’s Guidelines for the OAG dated 19 July 1976 implement the provisions of the Executive Order cited above.7 The Guidelines require that

Operations subject to OAG review shall include those for which certification (a Presidential Finding) by the President as ‘important to the national security of the United States’ is required by Section 662(a) [Page 271] of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, or similar operations conducted by agencies other than CIA.

In addition,

new initiatives and significant changes (in terms of money or political impact or operational direction) in previously approved special activities will be submitted to the OAG as proposals and will be considered in a formal meeting. The OAG’s policy recommendation, including any dissents, will be submitted to the President prior to his decision.

5. Section 662 was added to the Foreign Assistance Act in 1974. It stipulates that

[n]o funds appropriated under the authority of this or any other Act may be expended by or on behalf of the Central Intelligence Agency for operations in foreign countries, other than activities intended solely for obtaining necessary intelligence, unless and until the President finds that each such operation is important to the national security of the United States and reports, in a timely fashion, a description and scope of such operation to the appropriate Committees of the Congress, including the Committee on Foreign Relations of the United States Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the United States House of Representatives.

The legislative history of Section 662 indicates that the intent of the Congress was to bring CIA covert action operations under a new system of controls and accountability, and that the words “operations in foreign countries, other than activities intended solely for obtaining necessary intelligence,” as used in Section 662, were in fact a reference to covert action operations.

6. In accordance with the Executive Order and the Guidelines, proposals for covert actions to be carried out by CIA will be submitted to the OAG. The OAG will develop a policy recommendation for the President. In circumstances where a Finding as to the national security importance of the activities is required by Section 662, that requirement will be made known to the President. If the President makes a Finding, the DCI, under delegation by the President, will be responsible for reporting it to the appropriate congressional committees.

7. The President has made a number of specific Section 662 Findings and these have been duly reported by the DCI to the appropriate committees. [2 lines not declassified] which have also been reported by the DCI to the appropriate congressional committees, authorize CIA to continue to:

[3 paragraphs (11 lines) not declassified].

The overall purpose [less than 1 line not declassified] was to permit the CIA to carry out routine covert activity—[2½ lines not declassified]—without imposing on the President a requirement that he make a sepa[Page 272]rate Finding with respect to each such action. The [less than 1 line not declassified] also included the following language:

. . . I [the President] also find important to the national security of the United States the support necessary to the tasks and operations covered by this Finding.

The main purpose of this language was to provide the CIA with authority [less than 1 line not declassified] to conduct covert action operations, as for example, to pay salaries and overhead, to pay for the procurement of items to support CIA [less than 1 line not declassified] activities, and to pay the costs of the cover and security support for these activities. In addition, this language authorizes tasks that are incidental to approved covert actions, as for example, withdrawal from an unsuccessful action.

8. In carrying out the routine covert actions [less than 1 line not declassified] the CIA will make a determination when employing and funding foreign personalities that such actions are in support of current United States policies. In tasking its [less than 1 line not declassified] CIA may look to specific proposals recommended by the OAG and approved by the President, guidelines approved by the Department of State [less than 1 line not declassified] as the U.S. Government policy on international issues or on other foreign developments as to which U.S. interests could be advanced by covert means with limited political risk, or where time is of the essence may receive specific guidance from the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs or such office as the State Department considers appropriate, in which case CIA shall report such guidance to the OAG at its next meeting.

9. No CIA activity, other than one “intended solely for obtaining necessary intelligence,” may be carried out without a proposal for such activity being submitted to the OAG and approved by the President, unless that activity has previously been the subject of a Presidential Finding under Section 662. Where a CIA activity, previously the subject of a Presidential Finding, will undergo a “significant change” or may constitute a “new initiative,” such change or initiative must prior to execution be submitted as a proposal to the OAG and approved by the President. A “significant change” or a “new initiative” shall be deemed to exist if the effect of the change is likely to have a substantial political impact, if the change is likely to increase significantly the risks of exposure, if the change involves a significant increase in money to be expended from that contemplated in the Finding under which the activity is authorized [3½ lines not declassified], or if there is any significant change in operational direction. In cases of doubt the Chairman of the OAG may determine whether a “significant change” or “new initiative” is involved, in which case he shall report his conclusion to the OAG at its next meeting, or he may refer the question to the OAG.

[Page 273]

10. The following matters shall always require OAG review and approval, [less than 1 line not declassified]:

a. Any programs involving [2½ lines not declassified] including operations which use [1½ lines not declassified]. For purposes of this paragraph programs shall include, but are not limited to, substantial enlargements of routine covert actions. In determining whether other matters are programs, CIA shall consider the contemplated length of time of the activity, the financial resources to be utilized, commitments to other countries, attendant risks, and likely political impact.

b. Any proposal to enter into a cooperative relationship or provide financial support [2½ lines not declassified]. This does not include the funding [1½ lines not declassified] where the intention is to employ such person primarily as an intelligence source. In these latter circumstances, OAG review and approval are not required.

c. [5 lines not declassified]

d. Any paramilitary program, [2½ lines not declassified].

e. Any counterinsurgency program where involvement extends beyond mere support or improvement of CIA’s intelligence collection capabilities through cooperative foreign intelligence and security services or the improvement of the intelligence collection capabilities of these services. For these purposes such programs include civic action or any covert use of U.S. Government personnel to promote institutional or other forms of national development. However, such programs do not include counterintelligence advice and technical assistance or counterterrorist training or training in intelligence collection techniques directed against international narcotics, given to cooperative foreign intelligence and security services by CIA to counter international terrorism and narcotics traffic. [1½ lines not declassified]

f. [4 lines not declassified]

11. Because routine covert actions [1 line not declassified] do not require the prior review of the OAG and the approval of the President, they shall be reported to the OAG as part of the OAG’s periodic reviews of programs previously considered. Such reports shall include [3 lines not declassified]. In addition, [less than 1 line not declassified] shall be reported by generally indicating the State Department [less than 1 line not declassified] followed and the general extent of the [less than 1 line not declassified].

  1. Source: National Security Council, Ford Administration Intelligence Files, 40 Committee/OAG Meetings, Minutes/Approvals, 1976. Secret. Sent for action. Attached to a November 23 memorandum for the record by OAG Executive Secretary Rob Roy Ratliff, stating that the approved paper “should now be considered an addendum to the Chairman’s Guidelines for Operations.”
  2. See footnote 4, Document 26.
  3. Ford initialed his approval on November 20.
  4. Secret.
  5. All brackets in the quoted text of Executive Order 11905 are in the original.
  6. Annotations to Executive Order 11905 were made by the members of the ICG working group and sent by Marsh under a March 10 covering memorandum to Bush, Ellsworth, Saunders, Hyland, Ogilvie, Buchen, Raoul-Duval, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Antonin Scalia, and Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice Civil Division Rex E. Lee. (Department of State, INR/IL Historical Files, Exec. Ord. on Intel. 1976) Further revisions of the annotations were forwarded by Raoul-Duval under an April 29 covering memorandum to Buchen, Bush, Ellsworth, Hyland, Ogilvie, Saunders, Scalia, Bill Morell, and Jim Poor. (Ibid.)
  7. The Chairman’s Guidelines for the conduct of OAG business as established by Executive Order 11905 were forwarded under a July 19 covering memorandum from Scowcroft to Kissinger, Rumsfeld, General Brown, and Bush. (National Security Council, Ford Administration Intelligence Files, Operations Advisory Group (OAG), 30 Jun 1976–Jan 1977)