Secretary’s Letters, lot 56 D 459. “President”
The Secretary of State to the President
Memorandum For The President
All of the understandings we sought with the French regarding Indochina have now been concluded and it is expected that the Exchange of Notes, or Agreements,1 will be signed at 6 p.m. Paris time today. An agreed communiqué will be issued at 6 p.m. Paris time tomorrow (noon, Washington time).
I attach a copy of the communiqué.
- Infra.↩
This text was made public in Department of State Press Release No. 529, Sept. 30, 1953.
This communiqué was the result of negotiations between U.S. and French officials in Paris, with instructions from the Department of State playing an important role in matters of both form and substance. A major point of contention was the French desire that the communiqué allude to the possibility of a negotiated settlement in Indochina, or at least not rule out that possibility. An advance French draft, transmitted to Washington in telegram 1255, Sept. 26, included the following paragraph:
“On a purely military plane, aware that an increased effort is necessary to assure the success of existing plans for the destruction of the enemy’s battle forces, it was decided to send, temporarily, reinforcements to its expeditionary corps and to intensify, in cooperation with the Associated States, the formation of strong national armies which will be able to impose upon the Communist enemy a regime of liberty and independence under restored peaceful conditions.”
In the same telegram, Ambassador Dillon commented as follows: “We had informed Foreign Office of importance we attached to point that communiqué reflect intention carry out Navarre plan and avoid any hint negotiations possible. Above is best attempt satisfy these requirements which Foreign Office states they can get through government in present political climate regarding Indochina. They state impossible get Cabinet approval any text which excludes possibility negotiated peace.” (751G.5 MSP/9–2653)
In telegram 1170 to Paris, Sept. 26, the Department objected vigorously to the French draft. The telegram read in part as follows: “General tone draft communiqué is disappointingly soft and vague.… We would hope that French Government would agree that any indication of weakness at this juncture can only undercut Laniel–Navarre plan and negate additional effort which France with further US assistance is about to make. Communiqué at sharp variance both with energetic and determined tenor of exchange of letters and with specific assurances contained therein.… This matter is most important here where we have had overcome truly great difficulties find necessary funds and in meeting Congressional views. You should intervene personally with Laniel.” (751G.5 MSP/9–2653)
In telegram 1273 from Paris, Sept. 28, Ambassador Dillon reported that as the result of his intervention that afternoon with Foreign Minister Bidault, the Foreign Ministry had agreed to a slightly revised U.S. draft. That agreed text, transmitted in telegram 1273, is virtually identical with the communiqué as released on Sept. 30. (751G.5 MSP/9–2853)
↩