890.00/12–2254

Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic Affairs (Waugh) to the Secretary of State 1

Subject:

  • British Aide-Mémoire on Aid to Asia.
[Page 1073]

Friday, December 17, Lord Harcourt2 left the attached (Tab B)3 aide-mémoire containing the “preliminary and tentative” views of the British respecting economic aid to Asian countries. For your convenience, I had a brief summary of the aide-mémoire prepared; it is attached (Tab A).

Lord Harcourt, at the time of delivery of this paper, expressed the hope that the Ambassador and he might meet with you to discuss the points raised. Naturally, they will wish to know where we stand in our thinking on this subject. When our own work on the subject of aid to Asia has proceeded somewhat further, I believe it would be desirable to see the British on this matter.

I have seen to it that all other principal officers of the Government have received copies of the aide-mémoire.

[Tab A]

Summary of Aide-Mémoire From U.K.

The aide-mémoire summarized below was prepared in response to Mr. Stassen’s invitation to the U.K. Government to make available to the U.S. Administration any ideas they may have on the planning of future economic assistance to the countries of South East Asia and the Far East.

1.
The U.K. Government believes that the countries of the area will need governmental economic and technical aid from abroad for a long time to come. Private capital cannot be expected to be attracted in anything like sufficient volume. It is of far-reaching political as well as economic importance that further aid be made available, and that the aid come from the West rather than from the Communist world.
2.
The U.K. Government believes that:
(a)
The proposals of the West must be generous enough and on a sufficient scale to catch the imagination of the Asians and convince them of our sincerity. They must cover a period of years so that the Asian governments may have confidence in the future and may plan ahead. However, hopes should not be raised that cannot be fulfilled.
(b)
No steps must be taken that do not have the whole-hearted support of the Asians themselves.
(c)
The arrangements proposed must provide for direct bilateral negotiations between contributors and recipients and the contributors should retain control over the time and manner of the assistance they give.
3.
The U.K. Government suggests that:
(a)
Proposals would be most likely to be successful if they were backed by a substantial amount in dollars or sterling, and available to be drawn on over a period of years. These monies would not be paid over from the start, but would represent the sum total of the commitments which the contributory governments were prepared to enter into over a period of say three or four years under a series of coordinated bilateral credit arrangements.
(b)
The bulk of the aid would have to come from the U.S. Government. The possibility of further contributions from the U.K. would have to be considered against the background of the U.K.’s already heavy liabilities and commitments in the area.
(c)
The division of aid between short-term and long-term purposes would be for consideration later. However, the U.K. Government hopes that contributing governments would not tie their contributions to purchases in their own countries but would make them freely convertible into other currencies as needed.
(d)
Drawing on the fund would be by direct approach from one government to another, in bilateral negotiation. However, it would be useful to have a common staff for technical examination of applications, the staff to be drawn largely from western countries but including Asian representatives as well. Its functions would be advisory and its use by governments would be optional.
(e)
Aid might be in the form of loans, including soft loans, or even grants.
(f)
There is no scope for any mechanism on the lines of the European Payments Union.
(g)
While surplus agricultural commodities can be of assistance to the area, their use would have to be supplemented by substantial aid in the form of free dollars.
4.
With regard to the Colombo Plan organization, there would be advantage to grafting the new ideas and organization on to the Colombo Plan framework. Nevertheless, the Colombo Plan has at the present time a considerable political as well as economic importance, as the only organization in which all the countries of the area are joined with Western Powers as free and equal partners; the British would not therefore wish to lend themselves to proposals which might be taken by Asian opinion as departing from the Colombo Plan ideas, or to do anything which would in any way endanger the continued functioning of the Colombo Plan organization. On this aspect of the matter, they would wish to be guided almost entirely by the views of the Asian countries themselves, and hope that the views of the U.S. Government will not be crystallized until these are known.
  1. Also addressed to Hoover. A marginal notation indicates the memorandum was seen by the Secretary.
  2. Viscount Harcourt, Economic Minister at the British Embassy.
  3. Dated Dec. 15, not printed.