Foreign Relations of the United States, 1950, Korea, Volume VII

795.00/11–2550: Telegram

The Chargé in the United Kingdom (Holmes) to the Secretary of State

top secret
priority

London, November 25, 1950—4 p. m.
[Received November 25—1:31 p. m.]

3076. I saw Bevin this noon and handed him message contained in Deptel 2752, November 24. He said he had already received “bulk” of message from Franks and that there had apparently been some misunderstanding regarding his attitude as he had no desire to upset applecart and Jebb was already under specific instruction to take no action re Korean resolution in absence of definite authorization, instructions which would be reiterated.

He stated that he agreed there was nothing to be gained by introducing his proposed resolution at this moment but is obviously preoccupied with his internal political situation (see in this connection Embtel 3043, November 24¹) and anxious to take any positive constructive action which may prove practicable and helpful. He said he hoped our action could be “synchronized” in New York but added jokingly that this did not mean he was promising not to take independent action. He gave definite impression that for time being at least we need have no worries that he will take precipitate action re Korea.

In light of Bevin’s helpful attitude, I feel it would serve no useful purpose to talk with Salisbury and Eden as suggested in last paragraph reftel, and in view Foreign Minister’s delicate situation re opposition particularly in connection with Parliamentary Foreign Affairs debate scheduled for coming week, such action might have most unfortunate repercussions. Will, therefore, take no action on this line unless Department feels strongly on subject.

Repeated info USUN New York 49, Department pass USUN.

Holmes

1. Not printed. It reported on a growing feeling of concern both in Parliament and the country at large regarding the Government’s shortcomings in the conduct of its foreign and defense policies. The concern was related to fear of a drift toward another war, misgivings over the economic consequences of rearmament, and apprehension over General MacArthur’s headstrong policies in the Far East (741.00/11–2450)