80. Memorandum From the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense Marshall1
SUBJECT
- A Project to Provide a More Adequate Basis for Planning for the Security of the United States
- 1.
- In response to your memorandum dated 8 June 1951,2 the Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered the report of the Interdepartmental Committee on Internal Security (ICIS) on the above subject.3 They have considered also a memorandum, dated 13 July 1951, by the Director of Central Intelligence4 which was forwarded to the Joint Chiefs of Staff by your memorandum of 19 July 1951.5
- 2.
- The ICIS report considers Soviet capabilities, Soviet intentions, and U.S. plans for the internal security of the United States. It suggests the need for further coordination and integration of such matters. The draft directive proposed in the report, addressed to the Director of Central Intelligence as Chairman, Intelligence Advisory Committee (IAC), is intended to remedy these inadequacies by establishing a project to develop a comprehensive appraisal of Soviet capabilities to injure the continental United States. The draft directive contemplates further that key Defense Department personnel be assigned to the project full time for an estimated period of six months and examination by the IAC of certain aspects of United States military war plans.
- 3.
- In the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff the project proposed
in the ICIS report involves four
distinct steps as follows:
- a.
-
An estimate of the capability of the USSR to launch a military attack on the continental United States.
Comment: This estimate should be prepared under the direction of the Director of Central Intelligence as Chairman of the IAC.
- b.
-
An estimate of the capability of the USSR to conduct sabotage and otherwise disrupt internal U.S. activities.
[Page 183]Comment: This estimate also should be prepared under the direction of the Director of Central Intelligence as Chairman of the IAC.6
- c.
-
An evaluation of our military capability to counter potential enemy capabilities as estimated in subparagraph 3 a above, and an estimate and report of the probable damage to the United States resulting from such attack.
Comment: This is a responsibility of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
- d.
-
An evaluation of ways and means available to counter potential enemy capabilities as estimated in subparagraph 3 b above, and an estimate and report of the probable damage to the United States resulting from such enemy actions.
Comment: This should be accomplished under the direction of the ICIS.
- 4.
- Procedures now in effect, whereby members of the IAC provide information and advice to the Director of Central Intelligence, assure assistance in the preparation of estimates 3 a and 3 b above by those qualified in such matters. Accordingly, such intelligence as is required for the project is available through normal channels without the assignment of additional Department of Defense personnel on a full-time basis to CIA. In addition, the ICIS is so organized that portions of the project allocated to that agency will not entail assignment of additional full-time personnel.
- 5.
- In view of the above, it is believed that the enclosed draft directives provide a more satisfactory means of accomplishing the purposes of the project than the one proposed in the ICIS report. It is recommended, therefore, that the enclosed directives be issued by the National Security Council in lieu of the directive proposed by the ICIS.
- Source: Central Intelligence Agency, Directorate of Intelligence, Job 80–R01440R, Box 3, Folder 10. Top Secret. The memorandum was sent to the members of the National Security Council at the request of the Secretary of Defense on July 30.↩
- Not found.↩
- Apparent reference to Document 79. A memorandum from DAH (not identified) to DCI Smith, July 23, which summarizes a June 1 draft of the ICIS report is attached but not printed.↩
- See the attachment below.↩
- Not found.↩
- A handwritten notation at the end of this paragraph reads: “Interdepartmental Int. Conf.” Regarding the subsequent assignment of this estimate to the Interdepartmental Intelligence Conference, see footnote 4, Document 86.↩
- Printed from a copy that indicates Bradley signed the original.↩
- Top Secret.↩
- Top Secret.↩
- Secret. All ellipses in the original.↩
- Not printed. Other memoranda are attached that relate to NSC discussion of the issue in June, including a memorandum from Lay to the National Security Council, June 5, which encloses a June 1 memorandum from Whearty to Coyne that transmits the June 1 draft ICIS report and a proposed National Security Council directive. The latter two are not attached, however, and none of these attachments is printed.↩
- Printed from a copy that indicates Smith signed the original.↩