Foreign Relations of the United States, 1949, The Far East: China, Volume VIII

123 Ward, Angus I.: Telegram

The Consul General at Peiping (Clubb) to the Secretary of State

Peiping, November 5, 1949—noon.
[Received November 5—3:20 a. m.]

1922. ReDeptel 766, November 2. Believe approach by Moscow Embassy to Soviet FonOff re Mukden case would be useless on following grounds:

(1) Court aspect of case will presumably be over in near future unless Communists propose development espionage angle by “discovery new facts”.

(2) As is matter of general repute, Soviet influence Manchuria strong and as suggested Contel 1899, November 2, perhaps Soviets themselves are responsible for manner handling case.

(3) Soviets once previously refused intervene and could be expected refuse at present juncture (if on different grounds) when their China policy is diametrically opposed [to our?] own, and

(4) Such approach would therefore indicate American weakness and possibly bring deterioration rather than improvement situation Mukden personnel. Therefore recommend against proposed line procedure.

Peiping’s position is as set forth Contel 1909, November 4.

Department to pass Moscow at discretion.

Clubb