501.BB Palestine(E)/11–549: Telegram
The Minister in Lebanon (Pinkerton) to the Secretary of State
588. Simes 28. Reference Esmis 29, November 2. Clapp conscious desirability taking firm line with Arab states and appreciated Department’s full cable under reply. All concerned here hope that text interim report, which will be in your hands within a week, will go far to clarify remaining points where local appreciation of issues differs from Department’s and leads to misunderstanding. ESM interim has been so drafted, in opinion of all deputies, that its recommendation regarding organization will not embarass national delegates to GA. ESM cannot, however, subscribe to organizational planning set forth in reftel. Inter alia Clapp cannot and will not recommend any US contributions to relief or works if UNRPR or any organization under SYG to handle program.
Reference paragraph 1 reftel, interim and final reports read together will be fully responsive to terms reference as outlined insofar as anything can be fully responsive to terms of reference at this stage.
Department is incorrect in assumption paragraph 3 reftel. Plans for long term development of scope and nature envisaged before Clapp left US, including those involving international river development, [Page 1470] could yet be brought to stage where funds need be sought until engineering arid related inquiries requiring two years time have been completed. However, works programs now to be recommended represent beginnings of such development in locations where international issues are not involved. Term works relief as used ESM would not be confused therefore with home industries in camps etc. as proposed by UNRPR.
Reference paragraph 4, believe that approach of ESM is “pleable” to legislatures as it will recommend conclusion of relief within 18 months time. Thereafter financing of development might be considered, taking into account then political factors. ESM remains convinced that modest beginnings development under relief financing are essential prelude to such long term activity. The basic question here is whether US considers it essential to have a part in the Near East. If so, the US cannot turn its back on a situation it is judged to be partly responsible for.
Reference paragraph 5, Clapp agrees but points out importance giving full consideration to weakness and internal difficulties local governments.
Reference paragraph 5a, please see supra. Existing technical data inadequate for purposes considered by Department. Other items 5a and 5b must await final report.
Reference paragraph 6, regret unable cable all data leading Clapp to differ from Department’s views on economic organization. Gardiner will be able explain on arrival in Washington next week.
Sent Department 588, Department pass London 18, Paris 22, Ankara 18.