123 Kirk, Alan G.: Telegram
The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Kirk) to the Secretary of State
1813. It had been my intention in accordance President Truman’s wish (my memo May 27 to Secretary of State1) to ask to be received by Generalissimo Stalin sometime in next few weeks and prior his departure Moscow area for south, as is his custom in late summer. Such visit to be arranged through Foreign Minister and to be call of courtesy on distinguished Russian leader and Prime Minister, with my remarks rather limited to generalities and politeness, unless otherwise instructed by you.
It seems to me such call on Stalin is now pretty well indicated and I think is expected by Kremlin. Although British Ambassador’s call (mytel 1804, July 21) has caused great flurry in diplomatic circles here and intense curiosity on part of press as to its substance, yet in fact such a call on my part on most important figure in Soviet Russia (who still retains title Prime Minister) would seem normal. I doubt if Kremlin would refuse our request and I believe we would be placed [Page 635] in dubious posture if we fail to propose it soon. On balance it would appear to me there are more considerations in favor of requesting to call than not doing so.
However, Kelly’s visit together with range of topics and character of replies seems to indicate careful consideration on our part as to matters to be broached by me and possible subjects Stalin may raise. Kremlin will be unlikely to accept at face value any statement that I am only calling as matter of courtesy, and serious subjects may easily be raised by Stalin, even if I avoid same. I am inclined to think it would be best to be frank and firm in stating our position on such topics as ERP, NAT or MAP or whatever others you may wish to have raised. I believe opportunity might also be taken to correct any misapprehension on current American economic situation by emphasizing elements of our strength.
It seems to us here we should carefully avoid any apologetic or defensive attitude in treating such matters, but make perfectly clear in suitable language the reasons for our actions with the objectives thereof, and without adopting an aggressive air.
Although two weeks elapsed between day British Ambassador requested his appointment and Kremlin response yet you should note that Kelly had only 48 hours advance notice he was to be received. Since London had instructed him in ample time he was not embarrassed by this short notice. It is important, however, to be prepared, and we should take full note of this fact.
Therefore, if you agree that I should ask to see Stalin, and I will not act until your approval is received, it seems to me important that you give me general line to follow in conversation with Generalissimo, and sufficiently in detail to ensure I am fully indoctrinated your attitude. Certainly my visit would not have slightest flavor of opening any negotiations but should rather partake of some measure of exposition or elucidation of subjects to be discussed. Length of visit and range of conversation can probably be largely in my hands by simply taking polite leave whenever your instructions have been covered.
It appears to me appropriate to see Vishinsky before the end of July to ask for this appointment.
Sent Department 1813, repeated London 184.
- In this memorandum, not printed, Admiral Kirk had written that among the points to which President Truman desired him to pay particular attention, one was to “Take action to see Marshal Stalin within a reasonable time after presenting credentials.” (123 Kirk, Alan G.) He had presented his credentials on July 4.↩