Policy Planning Staff Papers

Memorandum by Mr. George H. Butler, of the Policy Planning Staffs to the Secretary of State and the Undersecretary of State (Lovett)

top secret

PPS/28/2

Recommendations With Respect to U.S. Policy Toward Japan

Mr. Secretary:

Mr. Lovett: Attached is a Policy Planning Staff paper (PPS/28/2, Recommendations with Respect to U.S. Policy toward Japan). This paper is a revision of the original report which Mr. Kennan made upon his return from Japan.1 The revisions are comparatively minor and have been made to conform to the views of other officers in the Department concerned with the problem. The attached paper also embodies some of the views of the Department of the Army, Mr. Kennan’s report having been discussed with General Schuyler and Mr. Draper.

There are two remaining points of disagreement between this Department and the Department of the Army: (1) the timing of the peace treaty and (2) reparations. These divergences should be reconciled in the NSC.

Mr. Kennan and Mr. Butterworth feel that the underlying paper should be introduced into the NSC on May 27 so that it will have the status of an NSC paper when, on May 28 Mr. Kennan begins conversations with Mr. Dening of the British Foreign Office on the subject of Japan, following which he will be touching on similar subjects at Ottawa.

It is recommended that PPS/28/2, Recommendations with Respect, to U.S. Policy toward Japan, should be submitted to the staff of the [Page 776] National Security Council with a view to its approval by the Council members.

George H. Butler
[Annex 1]

Foreword to PPS/28/2, May 26, 1948 (Infra)

top secret

This document consists of three sections:

The first section contains the Department of State’s recommendations with respect to United States policy toward Japan.

The second section consists of memoranda of conversations held by Mr. George F. Kennan, Director of the Policy Planning Staff of the Department of State, with General MacArthur during Mr. Kennan’s recent trip to Japan.2

The third section consists of the observations of Mr. Kennan based on his trip to Japan.3 These observations should not be regarded as an expression of the official views of the Department of State.

[Annex 2]

Draft Paper for the National Security Council4

top secret

Recommendations With Respect to U.S. Policy Toward Japan

i. the peace treaty

1. Timing and Procedure

In view of the differences which have developed among the interested countries regarding the procedure and substance of a Japanese peace treaty and in view of the serious international situation created by the Soviet Union’s policy of aggressive Communist expansion, this Government should not press for a treaty of peace at this time. It should remain prepared to proceed with the negotiations, under some generally acceptable voting procedure, if the Allied Powers can agree among themselves on such a procedure. We should, before actually entering into a peace conference, seek through the diplomatic channel [Page 777] the concurrence of a majority of the participating countries in the principal points of content we desire to have in such a treaty. Meanwhile, we should concentrate our attention on the preparation of the Japanese for the eventual removal of the regime of control.

2. The Nature of the Treaty

It should be our aim to have the treaty, when finally negotiated, as brief, as general, and as nonpunitive as possible. To this end we should try to clear away during this intervening period as many as possible of the matters which might otherwise be expected to enter into the treaty of peace. Our aim should be to reduce as far as possible the number of questions to be treated in the peace treaty. This applies particularly to such matters as property rights, restitution, etc. Our policy for the coming period should be shaped specifically with this in mind.

ii. security matters

1. Disposition of our Tactical Forces in the Pre-Treaty Period

Tactical forces should be retained in Japan for the coming period; but every effort, consistent with military security and the proper performance of the occupational mission as envisaged in this policy paper, should be made to reduce to a minimum their numbers, their cost to the Japanese economy, and the psychological impact of their presence on the Japanese population. The arrangements for their location, support and employment should be determined with this in mind.

2. The Post-Treaty Arrangements

United States tactical forces should be retained in Japan until the entrance into effect of a peace treaty. A final U.S. position concerning the post-treaty arrangements for Japanese military security should not be formulated until the peace negotiations are upon us. It should then be formulated in the light of the prevailing international situation and of the degree of internal stability achieved in Japan.

3. The Ryukyu Islands

The United States Government should make up its mind at this point that it intends to retain on a long-term basis the facilities at Okinawa, and the base there should be developed accordingly. The United States Government agencies responsible for administering the islands should promptly formulate and carry out a program on a long-term basis for the economic and social well-being and, to the extent practicable, for the eventual self-support of the natives, At the proper time, international sanction should be obtained by the means then most feasible for United States long-term strategic control of the Ryukyu Islands south of latitude 29 degrees N.

[Page 778]

4. Naval Bases

The United States Navy should shape its policy in the development of the Yokosuka base in such a way as to favor the retention on a commercial basis in the post-treaty period of as many as possible of the facilities it now enjoys there. Meanwhile, it should proceed to develop to the maximum the possibilities of Okinawa as an advance naval base and increasingly employ the facilities on Okinawa, on the assumption, that we will remain in control there on a long-term basis.

5. The Japanese Police Establishment

The Japanese Police establishment should be strengthened by the reenforcing and reequipping of the present forces, and by expanding; the present centrally directed police organization.

iii. the regime of control

1. Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers

This Government should not at this time propose or consent to any major change in the regime of control. SCAP should accordingly be formally maintained in all its existing rights and powers. However, responsibility should be placed to a steadily increasing degree in the hands of the Japanese Government. To this end the view of the United States Government should be communicated to SCAP that the scope of its operations should be reduced as rapidly as possible, with a corresponding reduction in personnel, to a point where its mission will consist largely of general supervisory observation of the activities of the Japanese Government and of contact with the latter at high levels on questions of broad governmental policy.

2. Far Eastern Commission

The United States Government should ensure for its own part, and urge upon other FEC member Governments, that policy proposals considered by the FEC be confined to matters directly related to the fulfillment by Japan of its obligations under the Terms of Surrender, and be couched in broad terms leaving questions of administration to SCAP. On such matters, coining within the legitimate scope of authority of the FEC, the United States Government should seek to establish as promptly as possible firm United States positions and then adopt an aggressive and positive attitude, by direct discussions with FEC member Governments and by forceful backing in the FEC of policies desired by the United States. In matters of urgency, where it has become evident that, after efforts to achieve maximum international support, agreement cannot be promptly reached, we should [Page 779] not hesitate to use the interim directive. SCAP should also he encouraged to make greater use of his authority as sole executive for the Allied Powers, asking where necessary for the United States Government’s views. On the other hand, the United States Government should not hesitate to render assistance to SCAP by elucidating its interpretation of previous directives and general policies, notably those appearing in the “Basic Post-Surrender Policy for Japan”.

3. Allied Council

The Allied Council should be continued, with its function unchanged.

iv. occupational policy

1. Relations with the Japanese Government

(See Section III 1, above.)

2. The Reform Program

Henceforth emphasis should be given to Japanese assimilation of the reform programs. To this end, while SCAP should not stand in the way of reform measures initiated by the Japanese if he finds them consistent with the overall objectives of the occupation, he should be advised not to press upon the Japanese Government any further reform legislation. As for reform measures already taken or in process of preparation by the Japanese authorities, SCAP should be advised to relax pressure steadily but unobtrusively on the Japanese Government in connection with these reforms and should intervene—after consultation with the United States Government whenever the exigencies of the situation so permit—only if the Japanese authorities revoke or compromise the fundamentals of the reforms as they proceed in their own way with the process of implementation and adjustment. Definite background guidance embodying the above principles and indicating the United States Government’s views as to the nature and extent of the adjustments to be permitted should be provided SCAP in the case of certain reforms.

3. The Purge

SCAP should be advised to inform the Japanese Government that no further extension of the purge is contemplated and that the purge should be modified along the following lines: (1) Categories of persons who have been purged or who are subject to the purge by virtue of their having held relatively harmless positions should be made reeligible for governmental, business and public media positions; (2) certain others who have been barred or who are subject to being barred from public life on the basis of positions occupied should be [Page 780] allowed to have their cases re-examined solely on the basis of personal actions; and (3) a minimum age limit should be fixed, under which no screening for public office would be required.

4. Occupation Costs

Measures should be taken to bring about a further reduction of a drastic nature in the costs of the occupation borne by the Japanese Government. The number and size of construction projects ordered by SCAP utilizing Japanese materials and labor should be held to an absolute minimum.

5. Economic Recovery

Economic recovery should be made the prime objective of United States policy in Japan for the coming period. It should be sought through a combination of a long-term United States aid program envisaging shipments and/or credits on a declining scale over a number of years, and by a vigorous and concerted effort by all interested agencies and departments of the United States Government to cut away existing obstacles to the revival of Japanese foreign trade, with provision for Japanese merchant shipping, and to facilitate restoration and development of Japan’s exports. In developing Japan’s internal and external trade and industry, private enterprise should be encouraged. Recommendations concerning the implementation of the above points, formulated in the light of Japan’s economic relationship with other Far Eastern countries, should be worked out between the State and Army Departments after consultation with the other interested departments and agencies of the Government. We should make it clear to the Japanese Government that the success of the recovery program will in large part depend on Japanese efforts to raise production and to maintain high export levels through hard work, a minimum of work-stoppages, internal austerity measures and the stern combatting of inflationary trends including efforts to achieve a balanced internal budget as rapidly as possible.

6. Reparations

(Recommendations on reparations are to be submitted shortly.)

7. Property Matters

SCAP should be advised to expedite the restoration or final disposal of property of United Nations members and their nationals in such a way that the process will be substantially completed by July 1, 1949. It should be the objective of United States policy to have all property matters straightened out as soon as possible and certainly well in advance [Page 781] of a treaty of peace in order that they may not hamper treaty negotiations.

8. Information and Education

a.
Censorship. Censorship of literary materials entering Japan should be conducted with the minimum of delay and precensorship of the Japanese press should cease. This should not operate, however, to prevent SCAP from exercising a broad post-censorship supervision and from engaging in counter-intelligence spot-checking of the mails.
b.
Radio. The United States Government should immediately undertake a regular program of medium- and long-wave broadcasts to Japan from a transmitter station on Okinawa. These programs should be carefully prepared with a view to developing an understanding and appreciation of American ideas and at the same time to maintaining as wide a Japanese radio audience as possible.
c.
Interchange of Persons. The interchange between Japan and the United States of scholars, teachers, lecturers, scientists and technicians should be strongly encouraged. SCAP should continue the policy of permitting approved Japanese to go abroad for cultural as well as economic purposes under bilateral arrangements with the Allied nations willing to receive them.
d.
National Education Budget. The Japanese should be permitted to allocate a higher proportion of the national budget to educational purposes.

9. War Crimes Trials

We should press for an early conclusion of the war crimes trial of “A” suspects. We should continue and push to an early conclusion the screening of all “B” and “C” suspects with a view to releasing those whose cases we do not intend to prosecute. Trials of the others should be instituted and concluded at the earliest possible date.

v. state department representation

At the appropriate stage as the character of the occupation changes, the Secretary of State should recommend to the President that he send to Tokyo a Political Representative with the rank of Ambassador with attributes, powers and privileges similar to those of the diplomatic representatives of other countries in Tokyo. The Political Representative would advise the Commander-in-Chief on political matters and would report to the Secretary of State on matters concerning Japan. He would not, at least in the initial period, deal officially with the Japanese Government, although there would be no restrictions on his informal contact with Japanese Government officials.

  1. March 25, p. 691. In a memorandum of May 24 to the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic Affairs (Thorp), Mr. Butterworth submitted an earlier version of the paper, “revised in the light of informal discussions during the last few weeks with representatives of the Army Department.” He added: “In view of the urgent need to proceed with high level discussions of these policy matters; with other FEC countries, it is planned to introduce the revised paper into the National Security Council by mid-week and to seek the approval of the Council to the substance of this paper as rapidly as possible.” He noted that “very few important changes have been made in our original draft” and that revisions were “primarily designed to clarify our proposals.” (740.00119 Control (Japan)/4–2848)
  2. See annex 1 to Mr. Kennan’s report, PPS/28, March 25, p. 697.
  3. See annex 2 to Mr. Keenan’s report, p. 712.
  4. This text was transmitted as NSC 13, June 2, to the National Security Council for its information by the NSC Executive Secretary (Souers). Rear Admiral Souers added that its reference to the NSC Staff was at the request of the Under Secretary of State “for consideration and the preparation of a report to the National Security Council”.