894.50/4–948

Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State for Occupied Areas (Saltzman), to the United States Representative on the Far Eastern Commission (McCoy)

confidential

In reference to your letter of April 9, 1948 to the Secretary of State1 concerning a statement of the Soviet representative on the Far Eastern Commission presented at the meeting on April 8, 1948, I am enclosing a proposed reply for your use in the Commission.

Charles E. Saltzman
[Annex]

Proposed Reply to Soviet Representative

Statement by U.S. Member, FEC, Concerning Plans for Japanese Self-Support

On April 8, 1948, the Soviet representative on the FEC made a statement, circulated as FEC 298/2 concerning planned credits for the reconstruction of Japanese industry. The statement concluded that “the Soviet Delegation considers it necessary to state, in order to make clear that without the policy decision of the Far Eastern Commission on the question of the reconstruction of Japanese industry no other unilateral decisions and actions could be considered legal”.

I have been instructed by my Government to state that it is of the opinion that no Far Eastern Commission policy precludes the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers from assisting Japan in its exercise of the right to have peaceful industries adequate for its self-support. On the contrary, the Potsdam Declaration assures Japan the right to a self-sustaining economy. Policy decisions of the Far Eastern Commission reenforce that assurance.

For example, the Interim Import-Export Policy for Japan,2 approved by the FEC on August 18, 1947 states in paragraph 9 and 10:

“For the purposes of this paper imports are divided into the following three categories:

  • a. Imports received [required?] to prevent such widespread disease and unrest as would endanger the occupying forces;
  • b. Imports required to accomplish the objectives of the occupation;
  • c. Other imports requested by the Japanese Government.

“For the time being import programs under categories 9 a and b are authorized subject to availability of items and funds and such other limitations as may be operative …”

In the above quoted policy decision of the Far Eastern Commission, the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers is authorized, within limitations of other controlling policies, and more particularly within the limits of available funds and items, to arrange imports with Japan to accomplish the objectives of the occupation. The attainment of Japanese self-support clearly is one of such objectives. In the past Japan’s shortage of funds and needed items has held Japanese industrial output to less than 50% of the 1930–34 level and exports to less than 25% of those required to make Japan self-supporting. The U.S. announcement to the Commission on January 21, 1948, to which the Soviet statement referred, states the intention of the U.S. to assist in removing that obstacle to self-support.

  1. Not printed, but see memorandum of April 8, p. 724, and annex 2, p. 725.
  2. For text of FEC–032/26, July 24, 1947, see The Far Eastern Commission, p. 31; see also bracketed note, Foreign Relations, 1947, vol. vi, p. 263.