767.68/4–2348: Telegram
The Acting Secretary of State to the Embassy in Turkey
203. With regard Tsaldaris proposal for joint Grk-Turk declaration outlining basis for eventual pact to be adhered to by Arab States and supported by US and UK, it is Dept’s view that no steps toward such eventuality can profitably be taken until some kind of peaceful solution of the Palestine problem has been found. We would, of course, welcome any realistic and constructive development genuinely contributing to stability and security of Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. At some future time, when Arab attitude and intentions clarified, pact along lines presently proposed might furnish true basis for collaboration if countries of area should recognize their common interests and on their own initiative set up framework in which to protect and advance those interests. US not prepared at this time to take any initiative in matter or promise ultimate support in event such pact should emerge.
Therefore Dept does not at this time approve suggestion that US should give active diplomatic support in Near East capitals to these proposals. Furthermore, in view Palestine situation Dept not prepared at present to discuss possibility additional US military commitments in Near and Middle East nor to alter basic policy on other questions affecting this area in order to promote pact.
Dept has no objection to bilateral Grk-Turk declaration not involving US and merely open to adherence by Arab States as suggested Athens 644 Apr 16.1 However, we are doubtful that it would serve any useful purpose, as it seems improbable that Arab States would adhere.
If Tsaldaris determined on tangible demonstration rapprochement Greece and neighboring countries, possibility trilateral Italian-Grk-Turk declaration or pact might be advantageous avenue to explore. It [Page 80] would seem advisable, however, avoid raising public hopes in any these projects by advance publicity or reciprocal visits MinFonAff’s until substantial results in sight.
Foregoing views answer questions raised by Athens 644 Apr 16; Cairo 359 Apr 13; Ankara 303 Apr 8, 310 Apr 11 and 329 Apr 20.2 Other offices addressed should use info for background guidance and for response to questions if respective FonOff’s or Turk and Grk colleagues take intiative in raising relevant issues.
Sent Ankara 203; Cairo 457; Athens 504. Rptd London 1472; Paris 1372; Moscow 455; Rome 1190; Damascus 132; Baghdad 123; Jersusalem 295; Jidda 143; Tehran 366.