740.00119 Control (Japan)/8–1546

Memorandum by the State Department Member of the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee (Hilldring) to the Committee

confidential

Subject: Directive Regarding Exercise of Criminal and Civil Jurisdiction over Nationals of Members of the United Nations.

There is enclosed a draft directive prepared on the basis of a policy decision unanimously approved at the 23rd meeting of the Far Eastern Commission on August 15, 1946,77 under the provisions of paragraph II, A, 1, of its terms of reference. It will be noted that the policy decision is quoted verbatim in the enclosed draft directive.

It is requested that the enclosed directive be forwarded to the Joint Chiefs of Staff for transmission to the Supreme Commander for his guidance in accordance with paragraph III, 1, of the terms of reference of the Commission. It is assumed that if the Joint Chiefs of Staff feel that the draft directive does not satisfactorily express the policy decision of the Far Eastern Commission they will refer the matter to the State Department for clarification before transmitting a directive on the subject.

The Secretary General of the Far Eastern Commission has requested that the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in transmitting the enclosed draft directive to SCAP, inform him that the Far Eastern Commission agreed to release the policy decision on which the enclosed directive is based to the press, but agreed to withhold such release until the directive had reached the Supreme Commander.

J. H. Hilldring
[Page 297]
[Annex]

Draft Directive for General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Regarding Exercise of Criminal and Civil Jurisdiction Over Nationals of Members of the United Nations

The following directive, prepared by the State Department to implement the policy adopted by the Far Eastern Commission on 15 August 1946 under the provisions of Paragraph II, A, 1, of its terms of reference, has been received from the State, War, and Navy Departments for transmission to you for your guidance in accordance with Paragraph III, 1, of those terms of reference:

  • “1. The Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers should provide that no criminal jurisdiction of any sort will be exercised by the Japanese courts with respect to nationals of Members of the United Nations, but that such criminal jurisdiction will be exercised by military courts of Members of the United Nations as follows:
    • a. In the case of military, naval or air force personnel and persons attached to or accompanying the armed forces, by courts of the nation of the forces of which they are a part. A national of a Member of the United Nations who is present in Japan on official business and for the purpose of performing functions in the interest of the occupation is to be regarded as ‘attached to or accompanying the Armed Forces.’
    • b. In the case of a national of one of the occupying powers, by a military court of his nationality; and
    • c. In the case of other nationals of Members of the United Nations, by the Allied military court having jurisdiction in the particular territory. Such courts should be composed of three members appointed by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, one of whom should be a representative of that nation whose national is held for trial, provided that if, in the judgment of the Supreme Commander, selection of such a representative would obstruct or unnecessarily delay the proceedings because of the non-availability of qualified personnel, then a representative of some other nation may be designated.
  • “2. The authority of the Japanese to take into custody any national of a Member of the United Nations should be strictly limited:
    • a. To those areas of Japan not actually in Allied military occupation, and
    • b. In such areas, only to those cases in which there is reasonable evidence that a serious offense has been committed. The Japanese authorities should be placed under specific orders to hand over such a person forthwith to the nearest Allied military authorities.
  • “3. Provision should be made that no civil jurisdiction of any sort will be exercised by the Japanese courts with respect to nationals of Members of the United Nations attached to or accompanying the [Page 298] armed forces. Civil jurisdiction in these cases should be exercised in a manner determined by the Supreme Commander.
  • “4. Decisions in all civil cases affecting other nationals of Members of the United Nations or in which such nationals are or may become parties, should be reviewed by the Supreme Commander or his representative, who may revise the decision or take such other action as may be considered necessary for the protection of their rights.
  • “5. The Supreme Commander should take such steps as he deems necessary, including suspension of proceedings, to ensure that in the conduct of such civil cases the rights of nationals of Members of the United Nations parties thereto are adequately protected.
  • “6. It is recognized that the available United States legal officers will be barely sufficient to deal with such cases as involve United States nationals. The Supreme Commander may therefore advise the responsible commanders of other Allied forces that assistance in such cases as involve their nationals must be supplied by them.
  • “7. The term, ‘nationals of Members of the United Nations’, as used in this document includes, wherever applicable, organizations and corporations of Members of the United Nations as well as persons.”

  1. FEC 038.