740.00119 Control (Austria)/6–1945

Memorandum by the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee to the Secretary of State

The Secretaries of War and the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff concur in the recommendations of General McNarney in the attached copy of his cable on the subject of the Subdivision of Vienna and recommend [Page 147] that it be used as a basis for negotiations in the European Advisory Commission.71

For the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee:
H. Freeman Matthews

Acting Chairman
[Annex]

Text of a Telegram From the Commanding General, United States Army Forces, Mediterranean Theater of Operations (McNarney), to the Joint Chiefs of Staff

1. Vienna survey by United States mission is subject.

2. Innerestadt is badly damaged and most public buildings will require months to render habitable. Best hotels and restaurants however only slightly damaged.

3. Otherwise southeast badly damaged, west and northwest least damaged. Most desirable areas are in west and northwest.

4. The Gau contains limited recreation and training areas. At present Austrian city administration covers only the pre-1938 city limits. The majority of Austrian officials appear to consider it inadvisable to expand the city limits to the Gau until the city itself has been rehabilitated. It would be inadvisable from an administrative viewpoint to extend the zones into the Gau unless the city limits are also extended.

5. In order of priority airfields are Tulln, Schwechat and Zwolfaxing, although British and French rate Gotzendorf their choice over Zwolfaxing. Tulln almost undamaged, has excellent permanent housing and repair and storage facilities.

Schwechat has slightly damaged runway but hardly a building left standing.

Zwolfaxing has no hard runway, practically no facilities, but moderate possibilities for development starting from scratch.

The remaining airfields west of Danube are considered unsuitable.

6. Flory registered energetic protest at Russian refusal to let his expert see Aspern, Seyring or Deutseh-Wagram, stating that he could only report to his government that on basis of available information they are all first class all-weather fields.

7. Aside from question of airfields, the United States zone proposed in JCS 1169/9 (SWNCC 25/2)72 is entirely unsatisfactory from [Page 148] point of view of housing, office space or facilities as this area has been badly damaged and in normal time, apart from diplomatic quarter, contains chiefly small commercial enterprises, stockyards, slaughter houses, factories and lower class housing.

8. Our proposal also contains condition that an airfield must be an integral part of the United States zone. This position would create administrative difficulties both for ourselves and the other occupying forces and is believed to be unnecessary if the principle of free access enunciated in Para 11 A below is adopted.

9. As a result of lengthy discussions at a meeting at Allied Force Headquarters (AFHQ) yesterday under the chairmanship of General Lemnitzer, Deputy Chief of Staff, AFHQ, the British, French and American missions agreed to submit the following recommendations to their governments for zoning the city:

Districts 7, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19 to the United States.

Districts 6, 14 (that part within city limits), 15, and 16 to French.

Districts 3, 5, 11, 12 and 13 to British.

Districts 2, 4, 10, 20 and 21 to Russians.

The British and French agreed to recommend that a certain amount of housing in District 13 be made available to the French on a bilateral basis.

10. Mission heads also agreed to recommend assignment of one airfield for each power. United States will have Tulln, British Schwechat and French Götzendorf. Pending repairs to Schwechat, British and French will be granted lodger rights at Tulln. Thereafter British will accept Schwechat on joint occupancy basis with French provided French will reciprocate at Götzendorf.

11. The above recommendations are contingent on acceptance by the Russians of the following general principles agreed to in substance by the three heads of mission for the sharing of facilities in Vienna not divisible because of location or scarcity:

A.
Free and unrestricted transit rights in ground and air through all zones in Vienna and its environments for all occupying forces. In the case of highways leading to airfields outside the zones of the occupants of the airfield concerned, and training grounds outside the city limits, these should be internationally controlled.
B.
Public buildings and office space within the Innerestadt should generally be left for the permanent Austrian ministries and agencies which would normally use them. Other facilities in the Innerestadt, particularly hotels and restaurants, should be equitably divided on the spot between the occupying forces by the multipartite town command.
C.
Adequate training and recreation areas beyond the city limits should be provided by mutual arrangements between the commanders concerned.

[Page 149]

12. As explained in Para 4 it is considered undesirable to administer zone in the Gau outside the city limits. The question of whether or not the zones should comprise the Gau or city limits should ultimately be based on the decision of the Austrian administration itself, as to whether or not to expand the municipality to the Gau. If and when the city expands the control of the additional districts by the four powers should expand with it. This idea was agreed to by all three missions. The British and French did not consider it necessary to fix the boundaries at this time. Although we desire to fix the boundaries now we do not consider the point one of great importance.

13. Soviet proposals allot Districts 3 and 11 to French. 11 is worthless. French therefore state that this allocation is not acceptable. Their position is reasonable. Districts selected by Russians in Soviet proposal are generally unsatisfactory for offices and living accommodations. They contain industrial installations and bulk of working classes.

Allocation of areas 4 and 10 to Russians is reasonable. However, head of British mission is recommending to his government that these districts be included in British area as bargaining point. This is probably wise since Russian EAC representative may offer objection to allocation of Schwechat and Götzendorf airfields.

British mission also include claims to District 25 for same reason. They suggest that we ask for District 26. We do not require that area but our EAC representative may desire to press for it as a part of bargaining procedure.

14. Conditions in Vienna are generally unsatisfactory. Food rationing is barely above starvation allowance. Critical shortage of medical supplies. Only 3 ambulances in city. No doctor has a car. Russians exercise little control over city administration.

Each district operates as a separate cell with virtually no coordination from above. Business is at a complete standstill. Motor transportation in city non-existent.

Considerable evidence that Russians are stripping city methodically and efficiently. This is especially true of factory machinery. Signal equipment and furniture are also included. Although Russians expect to have a demolished section of Vienna allotted to them their officers are now scattered throughout the city in excellent accommodations. Russians jokingly suggested that it was hoped that suitable living quarters could be retained in United States, British and French areas.

15. It was evident to heads of missions that Russians are extremely eager to have Allies into Vienna at earliest possible date. Situation [Page 150] in city is deteriorating and Russian prestige is lowered every day we remain away. Russians were most friendly and cooperative within limits of their instructions from Moscow. These instructions were adequate except for prohibition to visit eastern airfields.

It was impossible to induce them to budge from that position. At one time Russians granted authority for United States courier planes to land at Tulln, but authority was withdrawn 6 hours later, probably because of fear we might inspect the three eastern airfields from the air.

16. Recommend that proposal outlined in Para 9, 10 and 11 above, agreed to in substance by three missions, be submitted to the United States delegate at EAC.

Also recommend that we continue to press for right to inspect three eastern airfields on the principle that all Vienna facilities should be shared equally by the four powders.

17. I recommend that General Flory with appropriate staff officers proceed to London to consult with the United States representative on EAC to advise and pass on to him detailed information obtained during recent reconnaissance in Vienna.

General Winterton, Head of British Mission, is departing Italy for London Monday 18th June, to report to British government and British EAC representative.

General Cherriere, Head of French Mission, is likewise expected to report to French EAC representative in London after short stopover in Paris to report to his government.

  1. Telegram 4933, June 19, to London, informed Ambassador Winant that General McNarney’s recommendations had received the concurrence of the State, War, and Navy Departments, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Ambassador Winant was directed to proceed with negotiations in the European Advisory Commission for a protocol on zones of occupation on the basis of those recommendations (740.00119 EAC/6–1445)
  2. Not printed; see footnote 54, p. 133