500.CC/4–345

The Secretary of the Interior (Ickes) to the Secretary of State 5

My Dear Ed: Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum which I have sent to the President and which I think may be helpful to you. I hope that you will steadfastly hold the line.

Sincerely yours,

Harold L. Ickes
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the Secretary of the Interior (Ickes) to President Roosevelt

I am considerably disturbed as a result of reports which have come to me as to the attitude of the Army and Navy with respect to the international trusteeship problem. Under Secretary Fortas, who participated in the State-War-Navy-Interior committee discussions of this problem, has advised me from time to time of the attitude taken by the representatives of the various agencies. I understand that the representatives of the Armed Forces have indicated a strong feeling that the United States should insist upon complete sovereignty of the Japanese mandated islands. I am now informed that the War and Navy Departments are urging that the matter of international trusteeship should not be discussed at the San Francisco Conference, or at least should not be discussed until there is a firm agreement as to United States jurisdiction over the Japanese mandated islands.

I agree that the United States should be the administering power for the Japanese mandated islands. The arrangement worked out by the interdepartmental committee seems to me to assure to this Government all of the rights which it could possibly desire for security purposes. The only question in my mind is whether the arrangement [Page 199] has not gone too far in providing a scheme by which these areas may be exempted from international accountability. But I feel most strongly that if the United States should insist upon complete sovereignty, an international grab-bag would result which would end in serious prejudice to the interests of this country and to the scheme for a peaceful world organization. For example, the British might well respond by claiming absolute title to certain areas in the Middle East which would not only affect our security interests but would seriously interfere with important commercial interests of this Nation such as our great stake in Middle Eastern oil.

I also feel that it would be a mistake to fail to reach an agreement on the subjects of mandated territories and dependent areas at the San Francisco Conference. The elimination of this topic from the agenda of the Conference would arouse suspicions and would be a continuing source of hostility and distrust. In my opinion, no International Organization can succeed or can even be successfully launched unless these vital problems are boldly confronted and dealt with on a basis of practical idealism.

Accordingly, I urgently recommend that the mandated territories and any territories which may be separated from the enemy should be placed under the trusteeship system, with only such safeguards as may be demonstrably necessary for security purposes, and that a prompt decision be made as to this Government’s policy, to be followed by a vigorous effort to obtain acceptance of that policy at the San Francisco Conference.

Harold L. Ickes
  1. Original missing from Department files. Copy obtained from the Department of the Interior.