841.24/2136

The Assistant Secretary of State (Acheson) to the Under Secretary of State (Stettinius)

Mr. Stettinius: Late yesterday afternoon, the draft instructions to Secretary Morgenthau,50 attached to my underlying memorandum, were discussed with Lauchlin Currie,51 Oscar Cox52 and Frank Coe.53 Mr. Currie said that FEA’s position was that it felt impelled, in view of the January 1 statement of policy and a recent draft letter from Secretary Morgenthau to Mr. Crowley, to take action or to have some specific decision made which would relieve it of the responsibility for taking immediate action.

I explained that I did not believe that FEA was impelled to take action yet, since no recommendation has been made by the sub-cabinet committee to the President’s dollar position committee, but that I did recognize their problem. I suggested that Mr. Crowley and you talk this matter over with the President and recommend to him that the proposed instructions to Mr. Morgenthau be sent, which would put FEA’s position in the matter beyond criticism and at the same time would not damage our relations with the British. The FEA representatives agreed.

D[ean] A[cheson]
[Page 95]
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State (Acheson) to the Under Secretary of State (Stettinius)

Mr. Stettinius: On January 1, 1943, the Interdepartmental Committee on the gold and dollar balances of lend-lease countries submitted a report to the President (subsequently approved by him) recommending, “in the light of present circumstances, that the United Kingdom’s gold and dollar balances should not be permitted to be less than about $600 million nor above about $1 billion”. It is clear from the underlined words that it was not the intention of the Committee, or the President, to fix at that time an arbitrary figure which would under all circumstances limit British foreign exchange assets. Any such policy, which would leave out of consideration the growth of liabilities against those assets, would be manifestly unrealistic and unfair.

In recognition of this fact, the British were requested in May, 1943,54 to submit for the use of the Interdepartmental Committee a report on their overseas financial problems. On September 14, 1943, the British Treasury submitted a memorandum indicating that:

1)
The total quick liabilities of the United Kingdom have increased from approximately $2 billion on January 1, 1940, to over $7 billion on June 30, 1943.
2)
Their quick assets in the form of gold and dollar balances decreased from $2.1 billions on January 1, 1940, to practically nothing in the Spring of 1941, and had risen by June 30, 1943, to only $1.1 billions (as of the present, they stand at roughly $1.2 billions).
3)
Their quick liabilities are currently increasing at a rate of over $2.5 billions per year; their gold and dollar assets at a rate of only $.6 to $.7 billion per year.

No reply has been made by the United States Government to this memorandum, nor has the Interdepartmental Committee met to consider it, although it has been under study in the different departments and agencies concerned. Secretary Morgenthau will be in London before the end of the month, and Sir David Waley has stated that the Chancellor of the Exchequer intends to discuss this matter with him at that time.

The policy of the United States Government has been, and presumably still is, so to conduct its relations with the United Kingdom as, at the very least, not to weaken British participation in the war [Page 96] and in subsequent efforts to establish an enduring peace. Arbitrary, unilateral action upon a matter so essential to British stability, taken without consultation with the British, could not but endanger the success of this policy.

I agree with Mr. Achilles that a comprehensive statement of the types of goods now supplied to the United Kingdom under lend-lease should be prepared at this time, in order to make sure that all are indeed properly lend-leaseable in terms of their contribution to the war effort.55 But I feel very strongly that no requisitions should be transferred to cash reimbursable without full consultation with the British.

I suggest further that you recommend to the President that he send instructions, along the lines of the attached draft, to Secretary Morgenthau to guide him in his forthcoming conversations with the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

D[ean] A[cheson]
  1. Not found in Department files.
  2. Deputy Foreign Economic Administrator.
  3. General Counsel, Foreign Economic Administration.
  4. Assistant Foreign Economic Administrator.
  5. See footnote 44, p. 90.
  6. Mr. Achilles had made this suggestion in a memorandum, dated October 19, 1943, to the Under Secretary of State (841.24/2127).