760D.61/761
The Ambassador in Chile (Bowers) to the Secretary of State
[Received December 15.]
Sir: Referring to my telegram No. 216 of December 5, 1939, and despatch No. 191 of December 5, 1939,7 I have the honor to transmit herewith the Spanish text and a translation of the formal communication delivered by Señor Abraham Ortega, Chilean Minister of Foreign Affairs on December 6, 1939, to the diplomatic representatives in Chile of Uruguay, Ecuador, Bolivia and Peru in reply to their suggestion that Chile associate herself with a protest against Russia’s attack upon Finland. This statement was officially delivered to the press; and is to the effect, as the Department will note, that Chile must remain aloof from European affairs. Its reception by the press has been diverse, but on the whole not very favorable.
Favorable comment has been made, on the one hand, not only by La Hora but also by the important El Mercurio. La Hora speaks of it as one of the most important developments in Chilean foreign policy which has appeared in recent years, and urges that an attitude of detachment from extra-American affairs should always be maintained by this country. El Mercurio refers to it as logical and dignified, since Chile preferably “should take refuge in her Americanism, and show the modesty which becomes her lack of power”. El Frente Popular, the Communist sheet, of course adopts a laudatory attitude in view of its attachment to Russia.
Adverse comment, on the other hand, has been voiced not only by El Imparcial and El Diario Ilustrado, but also by the Government’s own La Nación; and La Critica, La Opinión and El Trabajo, which usually support the Administration in such matters, have maintained a silence which may appear significant. La Nación makes the point that previous aggressions in Europe have been by countries opposed to popular government while Russia has hitherto been considered by the elements now in power here as one of the democratic powers. It also alludes to the fact that the other countries of America have in the present instance taken a line which will leave Chile isolated. El Imparcial adverts to the danger implicit in the failure of any small [Page 131] nation to protest against aggression on another small nation, and feels that Chile’s attitude regarding Spain shows that she does not inevitably keep away from European questions involving international principles affecting the entire community of the world’s nations. Similar ideas have been emitted on the floor of Congress by the Democratic Senator Morales and the Conservative Youth (liberalistic) Deputy Boizard.
In conversation with a member of my staff the Foreign Minister stressed the inability of Chile to understand the hidden currents in Europe which may underlie the Finnish situation. The interest of the Communist Party here, which is one of the important assets of the Administration, he said had hot figured at all in his decision. He showed great firmness in his determination to maintain this decision, a firmness which may perhaps be intensified by the criticisms to which it is being subjected.
Respectfully yours,