660P.116/36a

The Secretary of State to the Chargé in Latvia (Cole)

No. 160

Sir: The Department has examined carefully the data contained in the memorandum transmitted under cover of despatch No. 645 of March 14, 1935, entitled “American Trade in Latvia”, submitted by the Legation in reply to the telegraphic instruction No. 55 of December 5, 1934, and is seriously disturbed at the treatment accorded to American trade under the foreign trade policy and practices of the Latvian authorities, as described in the questionnaires completed by Latvian merchants interested in the importation of American products. Several American firms engaged in export trade with Latvia have likewise reported to the Department discriminatory practices of the Latvian authorities. The treatment of American trade in Latvia was also discussed with Minister MacMurray when he visited Washington recently on leave of absence.

[Page 555]

You are accordingly requested to seek an early interview with the Latvian Minister for Foreign Affairs,7 during which, after pointing out that this Government is viewing with anxiety the increasing difficulties which American trade is encountering in Latvia, you should present to him a copy of the attached draft note setting forth in detail the position of the American Government in the premises. You will observe from the contents of this draft note that it is designed to acquaint the Latvian Government with the foreign trade policy pursued by this Government, to point out certain practices of the Latvian authorities which are regarded as discriminating against American trade, to obtain from the Latvian Government an authoritative statement setting forth the precise conditions under which American goods are admitted into Latvia and the terms under which Latvian importers can purchase foreign exchange to pay for American products, and to invite the Latvian Government to cooperate with the United States and other governments in pursuit of a liberal commercial policy calculated to bring about a world-wide increase in international trade.

You should make special efforts to impress upon the Minister for Foreign Affairs the importance which the American Government attaches to this matter and its earnest desire to continue to generalize fully to Latvia all tariff and other concessions made in reciprocal trade agreements with a view to maintaining for Latvia equality of trade treatment and opportunity, thereby affording increased markets for Latvian goods in the United States. You should, in particular, emphasize that this Government desires to obtain from the Latvian Government the authoritative statement mentioned in paragraph six of the draft note, in order that it may be in a position to determine whether Latvia can be assured continued enjoyment of the benefits of reduced duties proclaimed under trade agreements.

[Two paragraphs here omitted are the same, mutatis mutandis, as the last two paragraphs of instruction No. 36, September 9, 1935, to the Chargé in Estonia, printed on page 188.]

Very truly yours,

Cordell Hull
[Enclosure]

Draft of a Note to the Latvian Minister for Foreign Affairs

1. The Government of the United States, in connection with the trade agreements which are now in effect or being negotiated with several countries, is examining the treatment accorded by Latvia to American trade in the hope of bringing about an early solution of the problems confronting commerce between the United States and Latvia; and proposes to set forth fully herein the general foreign [Page 556] trade policy being pursued by it with a view to enlisting the sympathetic and valuable cooperation of the Latvian Government in the promotion of a policy which has already won the support of many other countries.

[Points 2 and 3 here omitted are identical with the same points in the draft memorandum to the Estonian Minister for Foreign Affairs printed on page 190.

The first paragraph of point 4, also here omitted, is the same, mutatis mutandis, as the first paragraph of point 4 of the draft memorandum to the Estonian Minister for Foreign Affairs printed on page 190.]

The Government of the United States is, consequently, continuing to accord to Latvia most-favored-nation treatment under the provisions of the treaty of friendship, commerce, and consular rights between the two countries. One purpose of the present note is to ascertain the precise policy of the Latvian Government towards trade with the United States, with a view to determining whether Latvia should be assured continued enjoyment of the benefits of the duties proclaimed under trade agreements. If Latvia does not accord nondiscriminatory treatment to trade with the United States, consideration must under the law be given by the American Government to the withdrawal of minimum duties from Latvia, with due regard to obligations under the existing treaty.

In his instruction to the Secretary of the Treasury,8 alluded to above, the President also specified that minimum duty rates proclaimed in the agreements with Haiti, the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union, and Sweden shall be applied to like articles originating in a number of countries even though they are at present granting less favorable treatment to American trade than to that of other countries, until thirty days from the date on which he advises the Treasury that the United States has ceased, or on a certain day will cease, to be bound by provisions of a treaty or agreement providing for most-favored-nation treatment in respect of customs duties. In the case of the countries now in this group or placed in this group at some future date, it is expected that notices of termination of existing treaties or agreements will be given, in accordance with their terms, since the treatment foreseen in the applicable treaty or agreement is not being accorded to American trade. The Government of the United States proposes to follow this policy with respect to all countries discriminating against trade with the United States with which most-favored-nation treaties are in force.

5. The treatment accorded to American trade by Latvia has seriously disturbed the Government of the United States; and the increasing [Page 557] difficulties confronting that trade which have arisen from the discriminatory measures applied in recent years to imports of numerous American products and from the definite intervention of the Latvian authorities into the field of American-Latvian trade, resulting in the restriction of imports from the United States and the direction to other countries of the importation of commodities formerly obtained from the United States and which Latvian importers desire to obtain from the United States, have occasioned anxiety as to the future course of American-Latvian economic relations. The system employed by the Latvian Government to control imports from the United States has apparently operated to destroy the natural relative competitive position in the Latvian market of American products vis-à-vis similar products from other countries and to withhold from American commerce the treatment to which it is entitled under the provisions of the treaty of friendship, commerce, and consular rights between the United States and Latvia. While the Government of the United States appreciates the circumstances in which the Latvian Government has found it necessary to have recourse to a system of controlling imports, it desires to stress that the principle of fair treatment in international trade and the most-favored-nation principle enjoin upon every country making use of systems of limiting and controlling imports to apply those systems so as to derange as little as possible the natural relative competitive positions of the various countries supplying the imports of the articles affected. A policy of effecting a balance of the merchandise trade between the United States and Latvia through a system of compensation trade, the administration of foreign exchange controls, or other administrative devices is, in the opinion of the American Government, in conflict with the most-favored-nation treatment specified in the treaty of friendship, commerce, and consular rights between the United States and Latvia. In this connection, it is desired to point out that Article VII of that treaty provides, in part, as follows:

“Each of the High Contracting Parties binds itself unconditionally to impose no higher or other duties or conditions and no prohibition on the importation of any article, the growth, produce, or manufacture, of the territories of the other than are or shall be imposed on the importation of any like article, the growth, produce, or manufacture of any other foreign country.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

“Any advantage of whatsoever kind which either High Contracting Party may extend to any article, the growth, produce, or manufacture of any other foreign country shall simultaneously and unconditionally, without request and without compensation, be extended to the like article, the growth, produce, or manufacture of the [other] High Contracting Party.”

[Page 558]

In compliance with the above provisions, the Government of the United States is willingly extending its minimum duties specified in trade agreements with other foreign countries to articles of Latvian origin. It cannot but regard, however, the continued effectuation by the Latvian authorities of an import policy deliberately calculated to divert to other countries the imports of commodities formerly obtained from the United States, and the application of extra and additional charges on the sale of foreign exchange to be used to make payments for imported American goods, as an indication of an unfriendly attitude towards commercial and financial relations with the United States.

6. In view of the considerations set forth above, it is hoped that the Latvian Government will appreciate the desire of the Government of the United States to have accurate and authoritative information with respect to the attitude of the Latvian Government towards, and with respect to the treatment now being accorded in practice to, American trade in Latvia. The American Government, consequently, would appreciate receiving from the Latvian Government a statement setting forth the restrictions that are now imposed, or that may in the future be imposed, on imports from the United States and on the purchase or transmission of funds in payment thereof. It is particularly desirable that this statement contain full details with respect to the following points:

1.
The restrictions, other than customs duties and sanitary regulations of general application, placed upon the importation into Latvia of American products.
a.
Administrative measures such as embargoes, quotas, contingents, licenses, compensatory exports, et cetera, applied equally to similar imports from all other countries.
b.
Administrative measures as above not applied to imports from all other countries in the same manner in which they are applied to American imports.
2.
The restrictions placed on the sale of foreign exchange intended for use in payment for goods to be imported from the United States or for remittance to the United States in payment of imported American goods.
3.
An explanation of the nature, purpose, amount, and disposition of any additional fees levied or charged on American imports subjected to restrictions or on the means of payment for imported American goods.

The American Government earnestly desires to continue generalizing to Latvia all tariff and other concessions made in reciprocal trade agreements with a view to maintaining for Latvia equality of trade opportunity and trade treatment, thus affording increased markets for Latvian goods in the United States, One purpose of the present [Page 559] discussions is to obtain assurances from the Latvian Government that American trade will receive most-favored-nation treatment in Latvia, in order that the Government of the United States may be in a position to generalize fully to Latvia concessions accorded to other countries.

7. The Government of the United States trusts that the full statement of its foreign trade policy which it has made herein will indicate clearly its profound conviction that the normal flow of international trade can only be restored by the adoption throughout the world of a liberalized commercial policy resting upon the doctrine of equality of trade treatment and opportunity. It hopes that the present discussions between the Latvian Government and itself will be productive of beneficial results in promoting commerce between the two countries and will contribute to the revival of world trade and prosperity. The Government of the United States is convinced that the prospects of success will be materially improved by the adherence of Latvia to the policy set forth hereinbefore.

  1. Karlis Ulmanis, also Prime Minister.
  2. Department of State, Press Releases, July 13, 1935, p. 43.