List of Papers

(Unless otherwise specified, the correspondence is from or to officials in the Department of State.)

THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH OF NATIONS

UNITED KINGDOM

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and the United Kingdom

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 15 Memorandum by the Economic Adviser
Conversation with Mr. Chalkley, Commercial Counselor of the British Embassy, who expressed a general interest in the development of international trade, and suggested discussion of an arrangement with United States involving exchange of surpluses.
1
Apr. 26 (190) From the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (tel.)
Receipt of inquiry as to the authorizations regarding trade negotiations accorded to Ryder, American representative on the League of Nations Committee on Clearing.
2
Apr. 29 (100) To the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (tel.)
Information that Ryder is not authorized to discuss trade negotiations in London, but that he will visit various capitals for the Tariff Commission to make general trade observations.
2
June 21 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Discussion with Mr. Chalkley of the prospects of a U. S. British trade agreement, and mutual decision to prepare surveys on the subject.
2
Oct. 16 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Further discussions with Mr. Chalkley regarding plans to continue exploratory studies of British-American trade.
3

Arrangement Between the United States and the United Kingdom Relating to Air Navigation, Effected by Exchange of Notes, Signed March 28 and April 5, 1935

Date and number Subject Page
(Note: Citation to text of arrangement.) 4

Arrangement Between the United States and the United Kingdom for Pilot Licenses To Operate Civil Aircraft, Effected by Exchange of Notes, Signed March 28 and April 5, 1935

Date and number Subject Page
(Note: Citation to text of arrangement.) 4

Observations by the British Government Respecting Provisions of the Anti-Smuggling Bill Providing for the Exercise of Jurisdiction Beyond the Three-Mile Limit

[Page VIII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 June 17 From the British Ambassador
British nonconcurring views on some of the provisions of the Anti-Smuggling Bill (H. R. 7980) now before the Senate, and request for definition of certain terms in the bill.
4
1935 June 22 To the British Ambassador
Explanation of certain provisions in the pending Anti-Smuggling Bill, and advice that requested information is forthcoming.
5
July 9 To the British Ambassador
Letter from the Treasury Department, July 1 (excerpts printed), regarding the meaning of the terms requested on June 17.
6
Aug. 6 From the British Ambassador
Foreign Office note (text printed) elaborating British views with respect to the pending Anti-Smuggling Bill.
7

AUSTRALIA

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Australia

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 8 From the Consul General at Sydney (tel.)
Prime Minister’s inquiry as to probable date of U. S. reply to Australian trade proposal previously presented.
9
Jan. 15 To the Consul General at Sydney (tel.)
Suggested reply (substance printed) to be presented to the Prime Minister, rejecting temporarily the Australian proposals since they do not fit into the U. S. program of negotiations, already under way, envisaging a progressive removal of trade barriers throughout the world.
9
Feb. 8 (511) From the Consul General at Sydney
Conversation with Australian officials, who expressed disappointment at the nature of the U. S. reply in view of difficult trade situation now confronting the Australian Government.
10
July 9 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Exchange of views with the Australian Prime Minister, temporarily in the United States, on economic and commercial policy.
13
Sept. 23 To the Consul General at Sydney (tel.)
Concern over press rumors to the effect that an Australian delegation is proceeding to the United States to negotiate a trade agreement; instructions to drop comments in appropriate quarters on the unlikelihood of an early agreement.
15
Sept. 26 From the Consul General at Sydney (tel.)
Information that press references to imminence of trade treaty have ceased, but that Sir Henry Gullett, Minister in charge of trade treaty negotiations, may stop in Washington (en route from Europe) for trade discussions.
16
Oct. 8 From the Consul General at Sydney (tel.)
Information that neither Sir Henry Gullett nor a delegation will proceed to the United States; that, instead, the Australian Government will submit new trade desiderata after further study of the U. S. trade position.
16
[Page IX]

CANADA

Reciprocal Trade Agreement Between the United States and Canada, Signed November 15, 1935

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 4 From the Canadian Minister
Assurance of Canadian willingness to begin negotiations immediately looking toward a trade agreement with the United States.
18
Jan. 19 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Canadian Minister, who commented upon the possible necessity of publishing pertinent correspondence between the two Governments in connection with public announcement of proposed trade agreement negotiations.
18
(Note: Citation to text of public notice and statistics regarding U. S.-Canadian trade.) 19
Aug. 14 Memorandum by Mr. James C. H. Bonbright of the Division of Western European Affairs
Telephone conversation with the Minister in Canada, who told of the Prime Minister’s desire for definite assurance that active trade negotiations would be inaugurated in the near future; subsequent relay of such assurance to be given to the Prime Minister.
19
Aug. 28 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs to the Secretary of State
Receipt of President’s request that Canadian negotiations be discussed with him before any further commitments are made respecting cattle; summary of U. S. cattle offer concerning which the Canadian Minister has expressed great disappointment.
20
Sept. 9 (94) From the Minister in Canada (tel.)
Conversation with Dr. Skelton, Under Secretary of State for External Affairs, with respect to Canadian revised lists of desiderata and concessions which will be presented shortly.
22
Sept. 23 (90) From the Chargé in Canada
Memorandum, September 21 (text printed), of exploratory conversation between the Minister in Canada and Dr. Skelton concerning Canadian and U. S. lists of concessions.
22
Oct. 4 (119) From the Minister in Canada
Conversation with Dr. Skelton, who expressed extreme discouragement over the trend the trade negotiations have taken; particularly, concerning U. S. failure to include in its list of concessions the five principal commodities requested by Canada.
24
Oct. 25 (169) From the Minister in Canada
Memorandum, October 24 (text printed), of a conversation with the new Prime Minister (Mackenzie King) regarding resumption of trade negotiations.
27
Oct. 31 Memorandum by the Counselor of Legation in Canada
Discussion with Dr. Skelton concerning the Prime Minister’s proposed visit to Washington in connection with plans for continuation of trade negotiations.
(Footnote: Prime Minister’s arrival in Washington, November 7.)
30
(Note: Citation to texts of agreement and related documents.) 32
[Page X]

CANADA

Convention Between the United States and Canada for the Establishment of a Tribunal To Decide Questions of Indemnity and Future Regime With Respect to the Smelter at Trail, British Columbia, Signed April 15, 1935.

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 15 To President Roosevelt
Résumé of the Trail Smelter case, and advice that a Canadian draft convention for settlement of the case has been approved by the U. S. complainants; recommendation that the Minister in Canada be authorized to proceed with the signature.
32
Mar. 21 (1151) From the Minister in Canada
Conversation with the Under Secretary of State for External Affairs concerning U. S. acceptance of the draft convention and possible date for signature.
34
Mar. 27 (26) From the Minister in Canada (tel.)
Information concerning arrangements for signing the convention, the Prime Minister to sign for Canada.
34
(Note: Citation to texts of the convention and the decision of the tribunal.) 35

Proposal for a Treaty To Allow American Ships To Carry Cargo for Export Between Canadian Ports on the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, on a Basis of Reciprocity

[Page XI]
Date and number Subject Page
1933 Nov. 3 (103) To the Minister in Canada
Outline of broad policy to be pursued with respect to questions facing American shipping interests resulting from the amendment of the Canadian Shipping Act; information that the U. S. Government would consider the conclusion of an ad hoc treaty with Canada in this connection.
35
1934 Mar. 31 (280) To the Minister in Canada
Instructions to report on the action taken, if any, in accordance with instruction No. 103 of November 3; further, to ascertain the Prime Minister’s attitude toward an ad hoc treaty and his views as to any alternative course of action.
40
Apr. 19 (535) From the Chargé in Canada
Intention to have a full discussion with the Prime Minister on the shipping question; transmittal of copy of a letter, suggesting treaty negotiations, to be communicated to the Prime Minister later.
41
Apr. 23 (313) 1935 To the Minister in Canada
Transmittal of copies of certain congressional bills which have as their object retaliation against Canadian legislation on shipping; enumeration of factors which influence the Department’s opposition to such bills.
41
Feb. 15 (1079) From the Chargé in Canada
Prime Minister’s favorable reply, February 12 (text printed), to the Chargé’s letter suggesting treaty negotiations; request for instructions on specific points for formulation of reply.
44
Feb. 19 (13) To the Minister in Canada (tel.)
Advice that requested information must be delayed pending further consideration of the question; that the Prime Minister may be notified accordingly.
46
1935 May 6 From the Secretary of Commerce
Nonconcurrence, in reply to previous inquiry, in the State Department’s proposal for treaty negotiations, and transmittal of a report prepared by the U. S. Shipping Board Bureau (recommending retaliatory legislation against Canadian shipping).
46
May 27 (768) To the Chargé in Canada
Transmittal of the Commerce Department’s letter with enclosure; instructions to discuss matter fully with the Prime Minister in case inquiry is made regarding reply to his note of February 12.
47
June 14 (1304) From the Chargé in Canada
Opinion that it would be inadvisable to delay discussion of the present situation with the Prime Minister until he himself raises the question; suggestions for approaching the difficulties.
48
Sept. 12 (36) To the Minister in Canada
Department’s continued opposition to the Shipping Board’s suggested retaliatory legislation, but opinion that the matter of treaty negotiations should be dropped in view of nonconcurrence of other interested Departments.
52

Arrangement Between the United States and Canada Regarding the Level of Lake Memphremagog, Effected by Exchange of Notes, Signed September 20 and November 6, 1935

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Aug. 26 (17) To the Minister in Canada
Instructions to address a note to the Canadian Government setting forth the concurrence of the U. S. Government in the recommendations of the International Lake Memphremagog Board regarding the regulation of the flow of water from Lake Memphremagog, and inquiring whether the Canadian Government also concurs.
53
Nov. 9 (216) From the Minister in Canada
Canadian reply, November 6 (text printed), concurring in the Board’s recommendations.
55

Arrangement Between the United States and Canada Regarding Right of Consular Officers To Visit Their Nationals in Prison

Date and number Subject Page
1934 June 7 From the Acting Attorney General
Text of Federal penal regulation (as requested previously) governing the visits of consular officers to their nationals, and comments thereon.
57
1935 Sept. 24 (93) From the Chargé in Canada
U. S.-Canadian reciprocal understanding of 1934 (text printed) to permit consular representatives of either country to visit their nationals in penal institutions; Canadian Government’s willingness that the understanding be published in its revised form.
58
[Page XII]

IRISH FREE STATE

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and the Irish Free State

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Sept. 25 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State of a Conversation With President de Valera, in Dublin, August 29, 1985
President de Valera’s hopeful comments regarding the possibility of concluding a trade agreement with the United States; explanation of U. S. trade agreements program with other countries, now in progress, and advice that the present does not seem the most auspicious time to bring the Irish Free State into the program.
61
Nov. 20 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Conversation with the Irish Minister, who stated that he would make a formal request for opening of trade agreement negotiations in order to carry out his instructions, but that he understood the U. S. position in the matter.
62
Nov. 21 From the Irish Minister
Formal request for the opening of trade agreement negotiations.
63
Dec. 2 To the Irish Minister
Advice as to the inadvisability of entering into trade negotiations at present, but assurance of U. S. desire for ultimate conclusion of an agreement.
64

NEWFOUNDLAND

Disinclination of the United States To Negotiate a Special Trade Agreement With Newfoundland

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Apr. 9 From the Consul General at St. John’s (tel.)
Information that the Commissioner for Natural Resources has expressed an interest in opening negotiations for a possible trade treaty with the United States; request for certain data in this connection.
65
Apr. 16 To the Consul General at St. John’s (tel.)
Advice that the question of negotiating with Newfoundland is under consideration; that further information will be forwarded when a decision is reached in the matter.
65
Oct. 2 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation between Assistant Secretary Sayre and the Commissioner for Finance of Newfoundland during which the former enumerated various reasons for discouraging the idea of a special trade agreement at present.
65
Oct. 19 To the Consul General at St. John’s
transmittal of the memorandum of October 2, and further comments on trade.
67
[Page XIII]

NEW ZEALAND

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and New Zealand

[Page XIV]
Date and number Subject Page
1934 Nov. 16 (29) From the Consul General at Wellington
Note from the Minister of Finance and Customs (text printed) indicating New Zealand’s interest in opening conversations for a reciprocal trade agreement with the United States.
69
1935 Jan. 28 To the Consul General at Wellington
Reply (text printed) to be addressed to the New Zealand Government, declining the proposal for the present but manifesting interest in re-examining the matter as soon as domestic agricultural conditions permit.
70
Feb. 28 Memorandum by the Chief Economic Analyst of the Trade Agreements Section
Conversation with Mr. Campbell, High Commissioner for New Zealand in London, and an official of the Department of Agriculture, during which the former expressed interest in securing for New Zealand certain temporary tariff reductions on meats; enumeration of reasons for not considering the question at present.
71
Mar. 21 To the Consul General at Wellington
Information, in reply to a suggestion of the Consul General, that there is no change in the Department’s position regarding the possibility of a trade agreement with New Zealand.
73
Apr. 3 (104) From the Consul General at Wellington
Receipt of reply (text printed) to note addressed to the New Zealand Government in accordance with instructions of January 28; subsequent conversation with the Minister of Finance and Customs concerning trade relations in general.
74
May 6 (123) From the Consul General at Wellington
Conversation with the Minister of Industries and Commerce, who requested that the Department be assured of his Government’s interest in trade negotiations when the appropriate time arrives.
76
July 26 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
General discussion of the trade situation with the New Zealand Minister of Customs and three New Zealand experts; arrangement for further discussions between the experts and other interested U. S. Government officials.
78
July 27 From Mr. John R. Minter of the Division of Western European Affairs to the Assistant Secretary of State
Résumé of conversation of Minter and John L. Stewart of the Department of Agriculture with the New Zealand experts.
79
Oct. 11 To the Consul General at Wellington (tel.)
Instructions to address a note (text printed) to the New Zealand Government expressing continued interest in trade relations but impracticability of initiating negotations for an agreement at present.
81
Oct. 14 (210) From the Consul General at Wellington
Compliance with Department’s instructions of October 11.
82
1935 Oct. 25 (217) From the Consul General at Wellington
New Zealand Government’s reply (text printed) to U. S. note of October 14.
82
Dec. 15 From the Consul General at Wellington (tel.)
Inquiry as to whether the New Zealand Government may be guaranteed certain advantages with respect to butter.
83
Dec. 21 To the Consul General at Wellington (tel.)
Opinion that the time is opportune for the conclusion of a simple agreement with New Zealand providing for most-favored-nation treatment; instructions to ascertain the New Zealand attitude toward the matter.
83

UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA

Proposal for a Simple Most-Favored-Nation Agreement To Stabilize Commercial Relations Between the United States and the Union of South Africa

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 21 (826) From the Minister in the Union of South Africa
Controversy in the Parliament concerning matters of trade, particularly the unfavorable balance between the Union and the United States; report of the forthcoming establishment of a three-column tariff which will enable the South African Government to demand better tariff treatment.
85
June 27 (222) To the Minister in the Union of South Africa
Contrast between U. S. trade policy and that contemplated by the Union of South Africa; instructions to convey these views to the appropriate officials if considered advisable.
86
July 24 (936) From the Minister in the Union of South Africa
Observations concerning the three-column tariff adopted on May 10; question as to whether the U. S. Government should consider retaliatory measures in this connection or seek a most-favored-nation trade agreement.
87
Nov. 22 (235) To the Minister in the Union of South Africa
Instructions to present a note (text printed) to the South African authorities proposing a simple most-favored-nation agreement with a view to stabilizing commercial relations pending the conclusion of a reciprocal trade agreement at some future date.
(Footnote: Information that this note was presented to the Prime Minister on January 25, 1936; that no further reply was received after an acknowledgment on February 4, 1936.)
90
[Page XV]

EUROPE

AUSTRIA

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Austria

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 18 (291) From the Minister in Austria
Analysis of the present status of the Austrian market for American automobiles; observation as to the importance this question will play in future negotiations for a commercial agreement with Austria.
95
Mar. 28 Memorandum by the Chief Economic Analyst of the Trade Agreements Section
Discussion with the Austrian Minister of the U. S. policy of generalization of concessions under the recent Belgian Agreement; comments, in this connection, regarding the necessity of rectifying the Austrian discriminatory automobile import quota.
97
May 11 Memorandum by Mr. Rudolf E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation between Assistant Secretary Sayre and the Austrian Minister during which the latter proposed negotiations for a reciprocal trade agreement, and outlined his personal views in the matter.
98
June 24 Memorandum by Mr. Rudolf E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Memorandum (text printed) handed to the Austrian Minister by Assistant Secretary Sayre, recommending that trade negotiations be deferred for the present, pointing out, however, that Austrian commerce should meanwhile receive greater benefits under the U. S. policy of most-favored-nation treatment than could result from such negotiations.
99

Suspension of Payments on the Austrian Relief Obligation

Date and number Subject Page
(Note: Citation to summary of correspondence; information relative to non-payment of amounts due.) 101

BELGIUM

Reciprocal Trade Agreement Between the United States and the Belgo-Luxemburg Union, Signed February 27, 1935; Representations Respecting the Imposition of Restrictive Trade Measures by Belgium

[Page XVI] [Page XVII] [Page XVIII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 18 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Exchange of views with the Belgian Ambassador and Mr. Forthomme, head of the Belgian Trade Commission to the United States, regarding the benefits of a trade agreement between the two countries.
102
Jan. 18 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs of a Conversation With the Belgian Negotiators
Opening of discussions looking toward a trade agreement; Assistant Secretary Sayre’s explanation of U. S. trade policy.
103
1935 Jan. 29 (5) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Inquiry as to the Department’s wishes regarding use of the Ambassador’s good offices to advance the negotiations.
104
Jan. 30 (4) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Advice that difficulties being experienced arise from differences in approach; that the U. S. position may be discussed with the appropriate authorities should an opportune occasion arise.
104
Feb. 4 (6) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Discussion between the Counselor of Embassy and a Foreign Office official regarding the present obstacles to trade negotiations.
106
Feb. 4 From the Chief of the Belgian Commercial Delegation to the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Proposed exchange of letters (text printed) relating to the trade agreement, and invitation to discuss the latest confirmed Belgian concessions in this connection.
106
Feb. 6 (7) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Expectation that difficulties will result from operation of the “labor safeguard clause” connected with the Belgian Government offer to reduce import duty on certain automobile parts; information, however, that three major American automobile companies, which have assembly plants in Belgium, have expressed satisfaction at the offer.
108
Feb. 7 (5) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Request for explanation of the labor safeguard clause since the Department has no definite information on the subject.
108
Feb. 9 (8) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Explanation of the labor safeguard clause; opinion that the clause is dangerous in principle.
109
Feb. 13 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Conversation with Forthomme regarding the present status of the trade negotiations; concern over possible effect of political conditions in both countries.
109
Feb. 15 (11) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Information of appointment with the Foreign Minister for discussion of trade negotiations; request for any instructions or suggestions desired by the Department.
111
Feb. 15 (7) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Advice that the changed political situation has necessitated a revision of U. S. schedule of concessions; opinion, however, that substantial basis remains for a satisfactory agreement.
111
Feb. 16 (12) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Foreign Minister’s disappointment over the trend of negotiations, and his request for use of the Ambassador’s good offices to secure another interview with President Roosevelt for Forthomme.
112
Feb. 18 Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State
Discussion with the Belgian Ambassador and Forthomme of the reasons for the revision of the U. S. schedule of concessions.
112
1935 Feb. 21 From the Chief of the Belgian Commercial Delegation
Request that formal inquiry regarding authorization to import bulbs be forwarded to the Secretary of Agriculture.
113
Feb. 23 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Unsatisfactory interview between Mr. Camu of the Belgian Commission and Mr. Strong of the Department of Agriculture on questions involving sanitary restrictions against horticultural products; opinion that Agriculture is unwilling to cooperate on the trade agreements program.
114
Feb. 25 From the Acting Secretary of State to the Secretary of State, Temporarily in Useppa, Florida (tel.)
Reminder from Forthomme of importance of signing the Belgian agreement before his executive authority expires on February 28; advice that text of agreement has been sent to the President.
115
Feb. 26 and 27 Memorandum by the Acting Secretary of State
Exchange of views by telephone with M. H. McIntyre, Secretary to the President, regarding last-minute changes in U. S. schedule of concessions and content of publicity statement to be issued by the Department; signature of agreement.
115
(Note: Citation to text and statements issued upon signature of the agreement.) 118
Mar. 15 Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State
Discussion with the Belgian Ambassador concerning the necessity to proclaim the trade agreement at the earliest possible date due to domestic pressure in Belgium.
(Footnote: Citation to text of proclamation of April 1, and to certain statements regarding U. S. trade policy.)
119
Apr. 8 (1465) From the Belgian Ambassador
Information of measures taken by the Belgian Government in connection with the devaluation of the Belgian franc.
(Footnote: Citation to text of U. S. statement on effect of the devaluation of the Belgian monetary unit.)
119
Apr. 22 (19) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Instructions to endeavor to make a satisfactory arrangement with the appropriate authorities regarding the labor safeguard clause inasmuch as the problem was not fully explored during the trade negotiations.
120
Apr. 25 (42) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Receipt of information that a new decree is being drafted by the Belgian Government in order to give effect to the provisions of the U. S.-Belgian trade agreement.
121
May 4 (48) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Information that forthcoming Belgiam decree will make further concessions in the automotive sections, supplementing the concessions of the agreement; request for comments concerning attitude of American automotive industry.
121
May 6 (25) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Nonobjection of Automobile Manufacturers Association to the proposals outlined in telegram No. 48, May 4.
123
1935 June 28 (2674) From the Belgian Ambassador
Acknowledgment of letter transmitting a new draft for the general provisions which are to complete the recent commercial agreement.
123
Oct. 22 (609) From the Ambassador in Belgium
Résumé of Embassy’s efforts to obtain for the assemblers of American automobiles in Belgium the treatment to which they are entitled under the U. S.-Belgian Trade Agreement.
124
Nov. 9 (629) From the Ambassador in Belgium
Report on representations made against contemplated establishment of a quota on automobile tires imported into Belgium.
132
Nov. 20 (92) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Definite decision of Belgian Government to place a quota on automobile tire imports; request for instructions regarding two possible courses of action.
134
Nov. 21 (77) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Information that Paul Culbertson, who participated in the trade agreement negotiations, will arrive to consult with the Ambassador and Belgian authorities regarding the proposed tire quota.
135
Nov. 25 (93) From the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
From Culbertson: Opinion that no objection can be raised against the quota action; Embassy’s concurrence in this view.
135
Nov. 27 (79) To the Ambassador in Belgium (tel.)
Instructions to inform the Foreign Office that the Department will raise no objection to the tire quota but would view with concern any further extension of the quota system.
(Footnote: Subsequent report of Belgian nonintention to extend the quota system.)
136

CZECHOSLOVAKIA

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Czechoslovakia; Modus Vivendi, Effected by Exchange of Notes, Signed March 29, 1935

[Page XIX] [Page XX]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 3 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with Czechoslovak Minister with respect to the possible conclusion of a reciprocal trade agreement between the two countries.
137
Feb. 5 Memorandum by the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Conversation with Mr. Kabeláč, First Secretary of the Czechoslovak Legation, concerning possibility of working out a modus vivendi to provide most-favored-nation treatment.
138
Feb. 7 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Explanation to the Czechoslovak Minister of U. S. policy regarding application of the most-favored-nation doctrine in reciprocity agreements.
138
1935 Mar. 4 (12) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Press report of Department’s intention to publish list of nations which discriminate against U. S. commerce; request for verification.
139
Mar. 12 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Czechoslovak Minister, who asked to be informed of any discriminatory practices of his country against the United States in order that he might urge their removal.
140
Mar. 13 (9) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Information that the whole question of generalization of concessions to discriminating countries is under study; that suggestion might be made at the Foreign Office concerning U. S. desire for a modus vivendi under which discriminatory practices would be eliminated pending the conclusion of an agreement.
141
Mar. 14 Memorandum by the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Meeting between Czechoslovak representatives and Department officials during which the idea of a modus vivendi was favorably received by the Czechoslovak representatives.
142
Mar. 18 (11) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Résumé of content of proposed exchange of notes as discussed with Czechoslovak Minister and Kabeláč.
142
Mar. 20 (15) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Foreign Office denial of discriminatory practices and request for data on specific cases.
144
Mar. 27 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Résumé of discussion between the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section and Kabeláč regarding the proposed exchange of notes.
144
Mar. 29 To the Czechoslovak Minister
Note setting forth provisions agreed to regarding most-favored-nation treatment with respect to customs, quotas, and exchange.
(Footnote: Information that the Czechoslovak Minister presented an identic note on the same date to the Secretary of State.)
145
Mar. 29 From the Czechoslovak Minister
Explanation of the Czechoslovak Government’s understanding of the interpretation to be placed upon certain terms used in the exchange of notes.
147
May 25 (49) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Instructions to make informal representations against import discriminations on lard as set forth in two letters from the Institute of American Meat Packers.
148
June 17 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with the Czechoslovak Minister, who was told upon inquiry that no new announcements would be made for the next month or so regarding trade agreements with additional countries.
148
June 18 (17) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Opinion that continued complaint of meat packing interests should be called to the attention of the Czechoslovak Government in the light of the modus vivendi recently established.
149
1935 June 21 (27) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Advice that the Embassy is pressing for an equitable solution to the lard import problem.
149
July 19 (67) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Transmittal of a letter from Mr. Draper, Director of the Washington office of the Institute of American Meat Packers, regarding Czechoslovak discrimination against American lard, and résumé of conversations held with him in this connection.
150
Aug. 1 (30) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Announcement of Czechoslovak decree reducing import duty on lard and fatbacks; advice that alleged discrimination against American lard is being investigated.
151
Aug. 15 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with Kabeláč, who inquired whether the modus vivendi has been satisfactory to the United States.
151
Sept. 4 (267) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Résumé of a conversation with the Czechoslovak Minister to the United States, temporarily in Prague, concerning the question of negotiations for a trade agreement.
152
Sept. 13 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with Kabeláč, who was told upon inquiry that the whole question of the prospects of opening trade agreement negotiations is being studied with a view to determining whether a basis for successful negotiations exists.
154
Sept. 17 (20) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Instructions to prepare, in consultation with the Commercial Attaché, an evaluation report on the operation of the modus vivendi and a summary of Czechoslovak discriminatory practices against American trade.
155
Oct. 4 (288) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Transmittal of report on operation of the modus vivendi; explanatory comments in this connection and summary of Czechoslovak discriminations against U. S. commerce.
156
Oct. 16 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Czechoslovak Minister, who was told upon inquiry that the question of a proposed trade agreement is still under hopeful consideration.
159
Oct. 23 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Discussion with the Czechoslovak Minister regarding the trade agreement survey.
160
Nov. 27 To the Czechoslovak Legation
Aide-mémoire setting forth certain principles as a basis for trade agreement negotiations; request for comments thereon.
160
[Page XXI]

CZECHOSLOVAKIA

Representations Respecting Effect of Certain Provisions of the German-Czechoslovak Clearing Agreement Upon Shipments of American Goods to Czechoslovakia Through Germany

Date and number Subject Page
1934 Dec. 19 (47) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Instructions to ascertain whether there is any good reason why the new Czechoslovak decree (requiring cotton mills that buy cotton from Germany to pay a minimum of 4 percent of invoice value in reichsmarks) should apply to cotton sold directly to Czechoslovakia by an American firm although contracts are negotiated through an intermediary German firm.
163
Dec. 22 (75) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Information that the new decree is applicable to all shipments of cotton via German ports irrespective of whether negotiated directly or through German agents.
163
Dec. 29 (50) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Department’s concern over intended scope of recent decree; instructions to seek full explanation of Czechoslovak position.
164
1935 Jan. 12 (61) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Report on a conversation with a Foreign Office official regarding effects of the decree on American shipping.
165
Jan. 14 (3) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Receipt of further interpretation of the decree from the Foreign Office.
166
Jan. 16 (3) To the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Instructions to endeavor to work out with Czechoslovak authorities an arrangement whereby American sellers will receive full payment in dollars.
167
Jan. 23 (6) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Report of partial success resulting from representations, and of Czechoslovak willingness to discuss further the method of payment and question of “direct” trade.
168
Feb. 19 (9) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Request for instructions on certain points regarding method of payment.
169
Mar. 4 (11) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
Receipt of information regarding changes in the recent decree.
170
Apr. 8 (17) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia (tel.)
National Bank regulation concerning certain changes in the decree.
170

DENMARK

Efforts of the Department of State To Secure Equal Opportunity for American Commerce in Denmark

[Page XXII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 22 (108) To the Minister in Denmark
Instructions to endeavor to obtain relief from import restrictions on American products.
171
1935 Feb. 7 (277) From the Minister in Denmark
Efforts to lessen import restrictions on American products; reminder to the Foreign Office, in this connection, regarding U. S. policy of generalization of concessions to nondiscriminating countries.
171
Feb. 11 (2) To the Minister in Denmark (tel.)
Note to be delivered to the Foreign Office (text printed) making representations against apparent discriminatory policy of the Danish Exchange Control Board.
172
Feb. 13 (2) From the Minister in Denmark (tel.)
Request for permission to delete certain phraseology in the note to be presented to the Foreign Office.
(Footnote: Department’s approval of this request.)
173
Feb. 20 (282) From the Minister in Denmark
Interview on February 15 with Foreign Office officials during which the amended note was presented.
173
Mar. 26 (8) To the Minister in Denmark (tel.)
Instructions to endeavor to expedite Danish reply to U. S. note in view of its important connection with the formulation of U. S. policy (now in preparation) regarding generalization of tariff concessions contained in the Belgian trade agreement.
174
Mar. 29 (4) From the Minister in Denmark (tel.)
Danish reply (text printed) explaining the necessity for the Danish Exchange Control System, but welcoming any U. S. suggestion for improvement of commercial relations between the two countries.
175
June 9 (340) From the Minister in Denmark
Observations on the psychology of the local situation which prompted request for amendment of telegraphic instruction No. 2 of February 11; suggestion, in the light of these comments, that no adverse action be taken at this time with respect to U. S.-Danish commercial relations.
177

ESTONIA

Representations Regarding Alleged Discrimination Against American Trade in Estonia, and the Desire of the Estonian Government for Modification of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Consular Rights, Signed on December 23, 1925

[Page XXIII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 29 (283 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Estonia
Interview with the Foreign Minister during which a memorandum was left with him setting forth U. S. concern over the increasing difficulties which American trade is encountering in Estonia; transmittal of Estonian reply, and comments thereon.
179
Jan. 31 (611) From the Minister in Estonia
Discussion of various pertinent factors, with recommendation that they be reviewed before a decision is made to proceed with protests to Estonia on basis of Department’s instructions of December 1934.
183
1935 Mar. 22 (654) From the Minister in Estonia
Foreign Office note, February 27 (text printed), expressing the desire to modify the U. S.-Estonian Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Consular Rights (December 23, 1925), and stipulating certain import duty reductions to be considered in this connection.
186
May 22 (5) From the Chargé in Estonia (tel.)
Receipt of Foreign Office note suggesting that treaty revision negotiations be held at Tallinn and that a date be set for opening of conversations.
188
Sept. 9 (36) To the Chargé in Estonia
Instructions to deliver to the Foreign Office a note (text printed) expressing U. S. willingness to modify the treaty and a memorandum (text printed) outlining the general foreign trade policy of the U. S. Government.
188
Sept. 24 (444 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Estonia
Submittal of a memorandum entitled “Effects upon American Trade of the Existing Estonian Foreign Trade Policies”, and comments thereon.
194
Oct. 3 (452 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Estonia
Substance of views of certain Estonian officials in connection with the approaching commercial treaty negotiations with the United States.
195
Dec. 20 (527 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Estonia
Foreign Office note (extracts printed) setting forth Estonian desire to negotiate a reciprocal treaty with the United States such as the latter is now concluding with other countries.
198

FINLAND

Negotiations Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Finland

[Page XXIV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 July 16 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Eastern European Affairs
Presentation to the Finnish Minister of U. S. list of concessions desired from Finland and copies of specimen general provisions which are being incorporated in all U. S. trade agreements
203
Oct. 23 Memorandum by Mr. Landreth M. Harrison of the Division of Eastern European Affairs
Conversation with the Finnish Minister and Mr. Grady, Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements, regarding Finnish desiderata.
204
Nov. 6 Memorandum by Mr. Landreth M. Harrison of the Division of Eastern European Affairs
Telephone conversation with the Finnish Minister, who requested U. S. views with respect to each point in the Finnish desiderata.
205
1935 Dec. 17 Memorandum by Mr. Landreth M. Harrison of the Division of Eastern European Affairs
Discussion of U. S. counterproposals with the Finnish Minister on December 12, who subsequently relayed copies to his Government for comment.
205

Representations by the Finnish Government in Support of Claims Against the United States Arising From the Detention of Finnish Ships in American Harbors

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 1 From the Finnish Minister
Information that a complete record regarding the claims for the detention of 13 Finnish sailing vessels for various periods during 1918 has been handed to the Legal Adviser of the State Department.
206
Mar. 4 To the Finnish Minister
Information that the answer of the United States to the claims in question has been handed to the Secretary of Legation.
206
Apr. 12 To the Finnish Minister
Inquiry as to whether the statements set forth in the reply of the claimants (April 4) are to be regarded in their entirety as reflecting the views of the Finnish Government.
207
July 3 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Finnish Minister, who inquired as to procedure in connection with the question of having the claims adjudicated by the U. S. Court of Claims.
207
July 6 To the Finnish Legation
Department’s desire to postpone reply to Minister’s question of July 3 pending receipt of answer to U. S. note of April 12.
208
July 26 From the Finnish Minister
Information that the statements referred to in note of April 12 are to be regarded as reflecting the views of the Finnish Government.
208
Aug. 9 To the Finnish Minister
Expression of hope that the Finnish Government will agree with the U. S. view that, inasmuch as no new developments arose from the recent restatement of the case in behalf of the claimants, there is no element of liability on the part of the U. S. Government.
209

FRANCE

Negotiations Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and France

[Page XXV] [Page XXVI]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 30 (113) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Conversation with the French Ambassador, Laboulaye, who advised of his Government’s readiness to enter into negotiations for a trade agreement with the United States; instructions to forward a list of French proposed concessions, if available, together with any recommendations regarding the matter.
211
1935 Apr. 1 To the French Embassy
Invitation to enter into exploratory conversations in order to further clarify French tentative suggestions (now before the U. S. Government) with regard to the scope and nature of the proposed trade negotiations.
212
Apr. 1 (272) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Suggestions for preliminary discussions, and advice that every effort is being made to obtain list of French proposed concessions.
213
Apr. 4 (120) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Informal discussions between Department officials and Garreau-Dombasle, French Commercial Attaché, concerning proposals and procedure for a trade agreement.
214
Apr. 11 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with Laboulaye before his departure for France, who said he would urge his Government toward a substantial trade agreement with the United States.
214
Apr. 12 (328) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Informal representations against awkward situation created by rumors of French intention to increase certain tariffs just as the preliminary commercial conversations are getting under way in Washington; suggested outline of a basic agreement to be presented to the French Government.
215
Apr. 16 (136) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Conversation with Garreau-Dombasle, who told of his instructions to proceed with trade agreement discussions, and requested a list of the items which the U. S. Government would like to have considered.
217
Apr. 26 (154) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Instructions to ascertain whether a certain telegram (excerpt printed) regarding commercial negotiations, disclosed by Garreau-Dombasle, has been authorized by and represents the views of the French Government.
218
Apr. 27 (368) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Verification of the telegram referred to in Department’s No. 154 of April 26.
219
Apr. 29 (159) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Information that notice of intention to negotiate a trade agreement with France will be issued on April 30; that, accordingly, France will temporarily receive the benefits of the Belgian and other agreements now being negotiated,
219
Apr. 29 (1831) From the Ambassador in France
Discussion of the question of commercial treaty negotiations and related subjects with Laboulaye, temporarily in France.
220
June 28 Memorandum by the Second Secretary of Embassy in France
Observations on French commercial policy as brought out in a conversation between French officials and Charles E. Stuart of the Export-Import Bank.
222
1935 July 6 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with Ambassador Laboulaye upon his return to the United States, who urged that treaty negotiations be expedited in view of the present favorable mood of the French Government.
225
July 19 (2023) From the Chargé in France
Transmittal of a copy of a French counterproposal and comments thereon.
225
July 26 (2052) From the Chargé in France
Foreign Office instructions to Embassy at Washington to press for early conclusion of U. S.-French treaty; receipt of list of French concessions, and observations thereon.
227
Aug. 5 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with Laboulaye, who showed concern over the slow pace of the trade agreement conversations.
230
Oct. 19 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Interview with Laboulaye, who was told of U. S. concern over rumored French order to restrict importation of American motion picture films and reminded of the ill effect it would have upon the present trade negotiations.
231
Oct. 25 (437) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Inquiry as to whether new difficulties may be expected if an agreement is not signed by November 15, when French special power to sign expires.
232
Oct. 29 (928) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Opinion that the present should be a propitious time in which to come to terms, but that possibility of satisfactory agreement should not be sacrificed to mere concern over expiration of special powers.
232
Nov. 5 (446) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Information that the latest concessions proposed by the French are wholly insufficient; outline of Department’s minimum request in this respect.
233
Nov. 16 (966) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Comments on French Government’s response, telegraphed to French Embassy on November 14, to the Department’s recent minimum request for concessions.
235

Prevention of Discrimination Against American Motion Picture Films

[Page XXVII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 July 15 (280) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Suggestion that oral representations be made concerning proposed detaxation legislation which would discriminate against American films.
237
July 17 (602) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Information that the Embassy has made repeated representations in the matter; that both the Foriegn Office and the Ministry of Commerce, are doing their utmost to secure the deletion of the objectionable provision.
238
1935 July 26 (633) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Notification in the Journal Officiel of a decree embodying detaxation of cinema and other amusements and omitting any discriminatory provisions against foreign films.
239
Sept. 12 (780) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Information that a draft decree designed to regulate the moving picture industry in France is now under study; that full report follows.
239
Oct. 4 (396) To the Chargé in France (tel.)
Instructions to make formal inquiry concerning the nature of the proposed film decree, and to emphasize unfortunate effect on American opinion of any such decree promulgated during trade negotiations.
239
Oct. 8 (2222) From the Chargé in France
Information that instructions have been carried out; opinion, however, that the decree in question will undergo substantial modification and delay before being promulgated due to serious domestic differences concerning it.
240
Oct. 18 (2250) From the Ambassador in France
Precautionary representations to the Foreign Office in view of reports from trade circles regarding imminent promulgation of the decree.
242
Oct. 30 (929) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Information from the Foreign Office that the Cabinet has definitely decided not to issue the decree for regulation of the moving picture industry.
244
Oct. 31 (441) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Commendation for the manner in which the motion picture question has been handled.
244

Unsuccessful Informal Representations by the United States for the Removal of Restrictions on the Importation of American Nitrates Into France

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 18 (60) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Instructions to renew representations, if considered appropriate, against elimination of American quotas from the French nitrate market for the present year.
245
Feb. 19 (144) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Advice that Embassy has repeatedly urged maintenance of U. S. position under quota agreement of 1932; that an inter-Ministerial meeting is scheduled for February 20 to decide the question.
245
Apr. 1 (1744) From the Ambassador in France
Transmittal of Foreign Office reply to recent representations, and comments concerning its elaborate but flimsy argument in categorically rejecting the U. S. request.
245
[Page XXVIII]

FRANCE

Ratification by France of the Treaty of April 27, 1932, Relating to Double Taxation, and Proposal by France for a Supplementary Agreement

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 12 (84) To the Chargé in France (tel.)
Department’s concern over failure of French Government to ratify the double taxation treaty, approved by the Chamber nearly three months ago.
247
Mar. 16 (209) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Foreign Minister’s plan to appear before the Finance Committee of the Senate shortly to urge ratification of the treaty.
247
Mar. 28 (260) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Information that prospects of obtaining treaty ratification appear favorable; that Foreign Minister Laval will personally urge action before the Senate.
247
Mar. 29 (264) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Information that the double taxation treaty passed the Senate on March 28; that only the formalities of President’s signature and exchange of ratifications remain to be completed.
248
Apr. 4 (119) To the Chargé in France (tel.)
Appreciation of work done in connection with obtaining treaty approval, and hope that exchange of ratifications will be accomplished soon.
248
Apr. 9 (1769) From the Ambassador in France
Exchange of ratifications of the double taxation convention on April 9.
249
July 12 (585) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Receipt of Foreign Office note suggesting that an earlier date be set for bringing the convention into force.
249
July 24 (296) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Instructions to inform the Foreign Office of U. S. disinclination to bring the convention into force before January 1, 1936, since this would entail an amendment of the convention itself.
250
July 26 (634) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Substance of proposed reply to Foreign Office embodying the Department’s reasons for rejection of a change in date.
(Footnote: Information that the proposed note was approved on July 29 with minor change in phraseology.)
250
Oct. 2 (842) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
Publication in the Journal Officiel of decree promulgating the double taxation convention, making it effective as of January 1, 1936.
251
Oct. 14 (2238) From the Chargé in France
Foreign Office suggestion for negotiation of an addendum to the convention which would reciprocally exonerate French citizens resident in France from the American surtax on all or part of income derived from sources within the United States.
251
Dec. 19 (1142) To the Ambassador in France
Instructions to advise the Foreign Office of U. S. disinclination to take definite action on addendum pending completion of a general study of the subject now under way in the Treasury Department.
253
[Page XXIX]

FRANCE

Opposition by the Department of State to Proposed Denial by the State of Montana of License to French Insurance Company Because of Debt Default by France

Date and number Subject Page
1934 Dec. 29 From the State Auditor of Montana
Request for Department’s opinion as to whether the State of Montana can legally deny license to a French insurance company on the grounds that it is a corporation of a country which has defaulted in its war debts to the United States.
254
1935 Jan. 15 To the Governor of Montana
Acknowledgment of the State Auditor’s letter, and advice that the matter should be settled without consideration of the position of the French Government on its public debt.
255

GERMANY

Political Developments in Germany Under the National Socialist Regime

[Page XXX]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Apr. 3 (1897) From the Ambassador in Germany
Promulgation of the Third Law on April 1, completing the centralization of the Reich judicial system; celebration of event.
257
Apr. 9 (1919) From the Ambassador in Germany
Account of the recent establishment of a joint Economic and Labor Council; comments on its organization and purpose.
258
Apr. 20 (1936) From the Ambassador in Germany
Explanation of the provisions of a law, effective on April 10, designed to define legal status of the various Party organs and groups associated with the Party; opinion that the law carries a step further the consolidation of the results of the Nazi revolution.
260
May 2 (1955) From the Ambassador in Germany
Promulgation of a set of decrees, April 24, subjugating the press to the National Socialist State and clearing the way for a potential abolition of all newspapers not Nazi-owned.
262
May 2 (1957) From the Ambassador in Germany
Account of various events which have demonstrated tendency of German internal policy to veer sharply toward an extreme National Socialist position within the last month.
263
May 11 (1974) From the Ambassador in Germany
Advice that the National Socialists seem now about to be compelled to modify the application of the recent press ordinances in a manner to avoid abolition of the larger and better-known non-Nazi daily papers.
265
May 17 (1984) From the Ambassador in Germany
Survey of public feeling and of the present internal situation in Germany, particularly in the political center of Berlin, just prior to Hitler’s long-awaited Reichstag speech.
266
May 27 (2000) From the Ambassador in Germany
Discussion of the German Defense Law to take effect on May 21, and comments on certain phases of the new military system.
270
1935 June 11 (2043) From the Ambassador in Germany
Comments regarding a decision of the Chief Administrative Court of Prussia that actions of the Secret State Police in the performance of its duty are not judicable by the ordinary courts in Prussia; assumption that the judgment will also apply to other parts of the Reich.
275
June 27 (2096) From the Ambassador in Germany
Adoption by the Cabinet of a law, June 26, establishing universal labor service under the competence of the Minister of Interior; summary of provisions.
276
Sept. 17 (2314) From the Ambassador in Germany
Survey of developments at the Party Congress held in Nuremberg, September 10–16, as derived chiefly from a first impression of the speeches delivered there.
278
Undated Memorandum by Mr. S. R. Fuller, Jr., of a Conversation With Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, Minister of Economics and President of the Reichsbank of Germany, Berlin, September 23, 1935
Discussion of the aims of Germany.
282
Oct. 18 (2404) From the Ambassador in Germany
Comments regarding the strength and function of the S. S. (Schutzstaffeln).
287
Nov. 4 (642) From the Consul General at Berlin
Observations on the trend of political and economic developments during the past year.
289

German Rearmament, With Unilateral Repudiation of Provisions of the Treaty of Versailles

[Page XXXI] [Page XXXII] [Page XXXIII] [Page XXXIV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 12 (46) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Public announcement by the Nazi Government of the establishment of a German military air corps, notwithstanding the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles.
294
Mar. 13 (1845) From the Ambassador in Germany
Observations regarding the German announcement of establishment of a military air corps.
294
Mar. 16 (49) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Promulgation of a law for expansion of the army on the basis of compulsory military service, and résumé of Hitler’s proclamation containing his reasons for such action.
296
Mar. 17 (135) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Italian reaction of surprise and dismay over Germany’s announcement of rearmament.
297
Mar. 18 (58) To the Chargé in the United Kingdom (tel.)
Request for information as to the nature of a British note reported to have been prepared for delivery to the German Government.
297
Mar. 18 (112) From the Chargé in the Soviet Union (tel.)
Résumé of Izvestiya editorial stressing the political significance of the German declaration on military service.
298
1935 Mar. 18 (218) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Résumé of French press reaction to the German declaration.
298
Mar. 18 (116) From the Chargé in the United Kingdom (tel.)
British views regarding the recent German action; transmittal of text of British note to be delivered to the German Government in this connection.
299
Mar. 18 (50) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Opinion in official circles that atmosphere for forthcoming peace discussions with Sir John Simon has improved; intent of French, British, Italian, and Polish Ambassadors to protest violation of Versailles Treaty.
300
Mar. 18 To the Ambassador in France (circ. tel.)
Reaction of American press to German declaration; withholding of official comment.
(Instructions to repeat to London, Rome, Berlin, and Geneva.)
301
Mar. 18 (117) From the Chargé in the United Kingdom (tel.)
Information of favorable German reply to British note, and of Foreign Office notice to the press that Simon and Eden will visit Berlin as planned.
303
Mar. 18 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Counselor of the Belgian Embassy, who inquired as to American opinion on the German declaration and urged official expression of dismay.
303
Mar. 19 (1302) From the Chargé in the United Kingdom
Comment on motives of the Foreign Office in proceeding with plans for Simon and Eden to visit Berlin as originally scheduled.
304
Mar. 20 (223) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
French resentment over British decision to proceed with negotiations with Germany alone without consultation with France or Italy.
305
Mar. 20 (17) From the Chargé in Austria (tel.)
Advice that Austria’s reaction to the German declaration is one of silent but cordial approval; that competent Austrian opinion, however, does not envisage war as a result.
306
Mar. 20 (11) From the Chargé in the Soviet Union (tel.)
Soviet press announcement of deportation of “suspects” from Leningrad to Eastern points; opinion that this action indicates Soviet apprehension of German aggression, accentuated by mildness of British note of protest.
306
Mar. 20 (51) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
For the President: Informed opinion that, notwithstanding Hitler’s reassertions of peace motives, the German aim has not been changed; advice that peace propaganda continues pending crystallization of allied attitude.
306
Mar. 20 (1866) From the Ambassador in Germany
Expression of thanks for Department’s circular telegram of March 18, containing summary of American press reaction.
307
Mar. 20 (1868) From the Ambassador in Germany
Observations regarding the promulgation of the law which ordered general compulsory military service.
307
1935 Mar. 21 (145) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Suggestion as to what might be the announced position of the United States vis-à-vis German rearmament in violation of treaty obligations.
309
Mar. 21 (102) To the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Confidential information that the U. S. Government has reached no determination as to the action, if any, which it may feel it necessary to take with respect to the present German situation.
310
Mar. 21 (52) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
German rejection of French protest as not corresponding with the facts; understanding that similar answer was made to Italian note.
310
Mar. 22 (23) From the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Intention of the Polish Ambassador in Berlin to make oral representations to the German Government with respect to violation of the Treaty.
311
Mar. 22 (54) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Conversation with the Japanese Ambassador relative to the recent German action and to his conversations with German officials in this connection.
311
Mar. 22 To the Embassies in Germany, France, and Italy and to the American Delegation at Geneva (circ. tel.)
Excerpt from press conference (text printed) setting forth U. S. Government’s intention to proceed on its normal course with respect to the conduct of foreign relations and to follow events in Europe with the utmost care.
311
Mar. 22 (498) From the Chargé in the Soviet Union
Soviet opinion regarding the course which British foreign policy is adopting toward Germany and the Soviet Union.
312
Mar. 25 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Counselor of the German Embassy, who gave his views in defense of recent German action.
314
Mar. 26 (1876) From the Ambassador in Germany
Comments as to the possible far-reaching effects of the re-introduction of military service upon German life.
315
Mar. 28 (57) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Résumé of chief points allegedly advanced by Hitler in his discussions with Sir John Simon.
317
Mar. 28 (261) From the Chargé in France (tel.)
General acceptance of the Daily Telegraph’s version of the six demands made by Hitler during his conversations with Sir John Simon; French opinion that the Berlin conversations have served a useful purpose in that they have placed the German cards squarely on the table.
317
Mar. 28 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the German Ambassador, who disclaimed certain alleged objectives of his Government.
318
1935 Mar. 28 (1886) From the Ambassador in Germany
Advice that opposition to Hitler in Germany has eased and that he is more powerful than ever.
319
Mar. 31 (174) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Résumé of the German point of view as stressed by Hitler in his recent conversations with Simon and subsequently related by Hitler to French, Belgian, and Italian diplomatic representatives.
319
Apr. 3 (25) To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Request for personal estimate of the political situation in Europe at present and of probable developments.
(Footnote: Information that the same instructions were sent to the Ambassadors in France, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union.)
320
Apr. 5 (62) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Opinion that the present European situation is parallel to that of 1912; further opinion as to the probable trend of future German policy.
320
Apr. 5 (38) From the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Résumé of Hitler’s recent statements to Eden as told to the First Secretary of British Embassy.
322
Apr. 6 (302) From the Ambassador in France (tel.)
Estimate of the political situation in Europe, the most critical aspect being the question of establishment of new balances of power.
322
Apr. 7 (136) From the Chargé in the Soviet Union (tel.)
Opinion that the factors in the European complex immediately affecting the Soviet Union are possible German aggression and the countermeasures thereto; comments regarding Soviet consequent position vis-à-vis France, Italy, and Great Britain.
326
Apr. 9 (145) From the Minister in Czechoslovakia
Substance of conversation between Foreign Minister Beněs and Eden as related by Jan Masaryk, son of the President of Czechoslovakia.
327
Apr. 18 (82) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Report of German pessimism and uneasiness as reflected by the German press and conversation with Bülow, Secretary of State in the Foreign Office.
330
Apr. 19 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Rumanian Minister, who was told upon inquiry that no formal protest to Germany is contemplated regarding her violation of the separate U. S.-German peace treaty of 1921, inasmuch as the U. S. view has already been made known.
330
Apr. 21 (84) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Substance of unequivocal German reply to the League Council resolution (envisaging collective maintenance of peace).
331
June 17 (117) From the American Delegate to the General Disarmament Conference
Appraisal of political developments in Europe since the beginning of the year; opinion, in this connection, that the probabilities are against a continental war in the near future.
332
1935 July 15 Memorandum by the Ambassador in Germany
Analysis of the European situation.
337
Nov. 11 (2456) From the Ambassador in Germany
Exchange of letters between Hitler and Seldte, leader of the Stahlhelm, consummating the final dissolution of that organization; comments on the significance of this transaction.
340

Relations of the Nazi Regime With the Evangelical and Roman Catholic Churches

[Page XXXV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 24 (1699) From the Chargé in Germany
Effort of Reichsbishop Müller to justify to foreign press representatives his position in present controversy between the Confessional Evangelical Church and the State; alleged breakdown in negotiations between the disputing groups, and contemplation by the Government of a plan for the separation of Church and State.
342
Feb. 26 (1801) From the Ambassador in Germany
Observations as to the significance of recent developments in Catholic and Evangelical church circles in Germany.
343
Mar. 16 (1852) From the Ambassador in Germany
Account of events following issuance of a manifesto by the Confessional Opposition movement, attacking the “neo-pagan” trend fostered by elements of the National Socialist Party.
345
Mar. 18 (1853) From the Ambassador in Germany
Description of certain severe laws promulgated by the Government in retaliation against the Confessional Opposition in the Evangelical Church.
349
June 17 (2051) From the Ambassador in Germany
Convocation of the Synod of the Protestant Confessional Church in Augsburg, June 4–6, during which a number of declarations were drawn up, setting forth the position of the Church vis-à-vis the encroachment of the State upon its activities.
350
July 13 (2141) From the Ambassador in Germany
Information that a sharp attack has been opened against the Catholics, recent official speeches and measures being possibly the forerunner to a new and wider offensive against the Roman Church.
354
July 22 (50) To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Instructions to telegraph comments on new measures by the German Government applying to religious groups, as reported by the press.
(Footnote: Information that this instruction was sent at the request of the President and the reply, infra, was transmitted to him.)
357
July 23 (140) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Report on the intensification of the campaign against Jews and Roman Catholics, the principal indicator of Government intentions being the Goering manifesto of July 18 which denounces clerical interference generally and instructs provincial governors and secret police to prosecute manifestations of such action.
357
1935 July 24 (2171) From the Ambassador in Germany
Comments on developments in the new wave of Nazi extremism which is taking the form of a concerted attack upon the Jews, the Catholics, and elements regarded as “reactionary.”
358
Aug. 15 (2226) From the Ambassador in Germany
Substance of a speech delivered by Hitler on August 11 at a National Socialist Party celebration, during which he gave for the first time an intimation of his antagonistic attitude on the Church question.
360
Sept. 6 (2281) From the Ambassador in Germany
Further report on the position of the churches vis-à-vis the State and efforts of Minister for Church Affairs Kerrl to conciliate the issue.
362
Sept. 9 (2287) From the Ambassador in Germany
Indications of the development of a split within the Confessional Opposition of the Evangelical Church over the Kerrl proposal envisaging a kind of all-inclusive Church government; advice that the split is likely to come to light on the issue of the convocation of the Prussian Confessional Synod, scheduled for September 16.
365
Oct. 3 (2357) From the Ambassador in Germany
Information that the Prussian Synod closed on September 26 on a note of open defiance to the State, but received from the latter a retaliatory answer in the promulgation of a law giving Kerrl virtually dictatorial powers over Protestant Church matters.
366
Oct. 17 (2399) From the Ambassador in Germany
Promulgation of the first ordinance under the Church Law of September 24, providing for the creation of a Reich Church Committee to govern the affairs of the Protestant Churches generally throughout Germany; comments on Protestant reaction to this measure.
369
Nov. 5 (215) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Report of state of confusion in Evangelical Church affairs and of Kerrl’s opposition to the Confessional group, apparently due to Party pressure.
372
Nov. 27 (2493) From the Ambassador in Germany
Significant incidents in the still confused relations of the Government with both the Protestant and Catholic Churches.
372
Dec. 3 (231) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Increasing evidence of Nazi determination to carry through its program against the “pigmy remnants of” resisting organizations.
376

Government Control and Nazification of Institutions of Learning

[Page XXXVI]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 July 1 (2106) From the Ambassador in Germany
Renewal of various schemes to align students and school children in the aims of National Socialism, particularly, contemplation of a general leveling procedure aimed at the student “corporations” in the universities which emphasize class differentiation.
376
1935 July 8 (2129) From the Ambassador in Germany
Suspension of the Saxo-Borussia of Heidelberg, one of the most exclusive student corps in Germany; issuance of a decree ordering all students associated with the Hitler Youth to resign immediately from corporations of which they may be members.
379
July 16 (2143) From the Ambassador in Germany
Information that the Nazi agitation against the student corporations has momentarily subsided; description of previous incidents occurring during the acute phase of the struggle.
380
Sept. 16 (2313) From the Ambassador in Germany
Order issued by the Reichsminister of Education looking toward the “most complete separation possible” between Aryan and non-Aryan pupils in all German schools.
382
Sept. 21 (2327) From the Ambassador in Germany
Promulgation of a decree establishing Saturday of each week as “State Youth Day” to be given over entirely to “national-political instruction” in all the elementary, intermediate, and higher schools; further comments on the trend of the educational program.
383
Oct. 5 (2363) From the Ambassador in Germany
Announcement of the voluntary dissolution, October 1, of the Kösener Senioren Convent, the graduate body of the student corps and one of the few organizations which until the present time has successfully resisted the encroachment of National Socialism.
387
Oct. 11 (2385) From the Ambassador in Germany
Announcement of the voluntary dissolution of the Burschen-schaften scheduled for October 18, the greatest success so far achieved in the Nazi campaign against the student corps.
388
Oct. 29 (2423) From the Ambassador in Germany
Description of the dissolution of the Burschen-schaften as scheduled, and subsequent announcement of the voluntary dissolution of still other categories of the student corps.
389

Persecution of Jews in Germany

[Page XXXVII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 24 (5) To the Chargé in Germany (tel.)
Instructions to inquire discreetly as to why the German censor rejected Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s film “The Merry Widow”.
391
Jan. 26 (12) From the Chargé in Germany (tel.)
Reasons for German rejection of the film in question, and comments in this connection.
391
Apr. 1 (1893) From the Ambassador in Germany
Discriminatory ordinances and other evidences indicative of a new anti-Jewish campaign in Germany.
392
Apr. 30 (1952) From the Ambassador in Germany
Substance of Reichsminister of Interior Frick’s interview published in the Berlin Nachtausgabe regarding the forthcoming German citizenship law; comments as to its possible far-reaching effects upon the Jews.
395
1935 May 17 (1985) From the Ambassador in Germany
Detailed account of developments in the intensified anti-Jewish campaign.
396
July 17 (2150) From the Ambassador in Germany
Newer aspects of the increasing anti-Jewish wave.
401
July 31 (51) To the Ambassador in Germany
Letter sent to certain organizations (text printed) in reply to their joint appeal for representations against the recent occurrences in Germany affecting various religious and racial groups.
404
Aug. 15 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the German Ambassador, who was told that there was no way to compose aroused U. S. public opinion so long as apparently authentic press reports of violence continued to emanate from Germany.
404
Sept. 19 (2322) From the Ambassador in Germany
Transmittal of copies of laws adopted by the Reichstag on September 15 regarding (1) change in national emblem; (2) Reich citizenship (text printed); (3) prohibition of marriages between Germans and Jews (text printed).
405
Nov. 15 (223) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Promulgation of the first executory ordinances to the Nuremberg legislation of September 15.
408
Nov. 15 (2469) From the Ambassador in Germany
Request for definition of Department’s position on the question of German discrimination against American Jews; comments in this connection, and résumé of opinions of various diplomatic missions regarding their similar problems.
409

American Interest in the Work of the High Commission for Refugees (Jewish and Other) Coming From Germany

[Page XXXVIII] [Page XXXIX]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 2 From the High Commissioner for Refugees (Jewish and Other) Coming From Germany
Explanation of the autonomous operation of the High Commission, and the estimate of its 1935 administrative budget to which the U. S. Government has been requested to contribute.
412
Jan. 21 To the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
Clarification of U. S. position regarding financial contribution to the High Commission, and request that it be conveyed to High Commissioner James G. McDonald.
414
Jan. 23 From the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
Inquiry as to whether the President would seek Congressional authority for financial contribution provided other Governments represented on the Governing Body agreed to pay their share.
415
Jan. 24 To the Secretary General of the High Commission for Refugees (Jewish and Other) Coming From Germany
Comments on the six recommendations adopted by the Governing Body in London, November 1–2, 1934.
415
1935 Feb. 12 To American Diplomatic Representatives in South America
Instructions to extend appropriate courtesies to representatives of the High Commission, who will visit various South American countries to discuss the question of entrance of refugees into those countries.
417
Feb. 21 To the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
Concurrence in the President’s opinion that no effort should be made to secure contribution toward expenses of the High Commission until the other powers have acted.
417
Feb. 28 From the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
McDonald’s decision to drop the question of contributions at this session in view of lack of appropriate response from the major Powers.
418
Mar. 4 (1255) From the Chargé in the United Kingdom
Substance of the minutes of a meeting of the Permanent Committee held on February 12 for discussion of McDonald’s proposed trip to certain South American countries, and comments thereon.
418
Apr. 10 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Explanation to Mr. Chamberlain, American representative on the High Commission, of the difficulty of acting on his suggestion that Germany be urged to release more blocked funds for German refugees when many American citizens face a similar situation.
420
May 8 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with Chamberlain, who told of tentative plans to consolidate all refugee problems under the League of Nations; his request for U. S. views in this connection.
421
June 29 (158) To the Ambassador in the United Kingdom (tel.)
Nonobjection to centralization of refugee work under the League of Nations, and instructions concerning next meeting of the Governing Body.
422
July 13 (1326) From the Consul at Geneva
Conversation with the Secretary of the Nansen International Office for Refugees, who questioned the advisability of concentrating all refugee administration under one body responsible to the League of Nations.
422
Oct. 3 (979) To the Ambassador in the United Kingdom
Memorandum (text printed) to be transmitted to the Secretary General of the High Commission, furnishing certain requested information on the refugee question.
424
Oct. 16 (A/145) Recommendation Adopted by the Permanent Committee of the High Commission for Refugees (Jewish and Other) Coming From Germany
Text of recommendation for centralization of refugee work.
426
Nov. 26 From the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
Inquiry as to whether the U. S. Government would favorably consider the forthcoming proposals for centralization.
427
1935 Dec. 7 To the American Representative on the Committee for Refugees From Germany
Inability to take a definite position on the refugee proposal at present, but suggestion that the question be raised again when the plans have developed more fully.
427

Representations Regarding German Discrimination Against American Holders of German Bonds

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Apr. 17 (31) To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Instructions to make oral representations against announced German intention to offer only partial service of the Dawes Loan, and to leave an aide-mémoire (substance printed) embodying these views.
428
Apr. 18 (83) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Foreign Office justification of its action, and promise of prompt reply to the aide-mémoire.
428
May 8 (1969) From the Ambassador in Germany
Foreign Office reply, May 7 (text printed), to U. S. aide-mémoire denying responsibility for discriminatory treatment of American interests and indicating willingness to discuss proposals toward remedial action.
429
May 15 To Mr. John F. Robb, Cleveland, Ohio
Objections to previous suggestion for retaliatory action by imposing governmental controls upon foreign exchange remittances.
430
June 14 (2047) From the Ambassador in Germany
Transmittal of a communication, from the Reichsbank Directorate to the representative of the Foreign Bondholders Council, announcing continuation of the moratorium regulations.
432
June 28 To the German Ambassador
Review of discriminatory practices in the settlement of German financial obligations to American bondholders, and reiteration of strong objections to continuation of such policy.
432
Sept. 16 From the German Ambassador
Translation of official German statement (text printed) announcing intention to remove some of the financial disadvantages which have confronted American bondholders.
437
Oct. 1 To the German Ambassador
Acknowledgment of note of September 16.
438

Unsatisfactory Trade Relations Between the United States and Germany; Treaty of June 3, 1935, Voiding Certain Clauses of Article VII of the Commercial Treaty of December 8, 1923

[Page XL] [Page XLI] [Page XLII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 23 (10) From the Chargé in Germany (tel.)
Announcement by the Ministry of Economics of certain acceptable barter arrangements involving foreign products, and desire of American concerns for Embassy’s approach to the proper German authorities in the matter. Request for instructions.
438
1935 Jan. 24 (6) To the Chargé in Germany (tel.)
Opinion that the Embassy should not intercede in discussions relating to individual arrangements with the German Government.
439
Feb. 4 Memorandum by the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Explanation to Dr. Meyer, First Secretary of the German Embassy, of U. S. policy of withholding generalization of rate reductions to countries continuing to deny most-favored-nation treatment to the United States.
439
Mar. 28 Memorandum by the Secretary of State of a Conversation With the German Ambassador
Indication by the German Ambassador of his Government’s desire to negotiate a trade agreement with the U. S. Government.
440
Apr. 4 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
German Ambassador’s further inquiry as to the possibility of negotiating a trade agreement.
441
Apr. 24 To the German Ambassador
Acceptance of previous German proposal for modification of article VII (embodying most-favored-nation principle) of the commercial treaty of 1923; transmittal of draft agreement with request for prompt reply in view of forthcoming adjournment of Congress.
442
Apr. 30 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Counselor of the German Embassy, who indicated his Government’s acceptance in principle of the U. S. proposed draft, but expressed disappointment at U. S. conclusion that the two Governments are too far apart in concepts to negotiate a comprehensive trade agreement.
444
May 17 (350) From the Consul General at Berlin
Observations on developments leading to a more lenient attitude by the Ministry of Economics in authorizing the establishment of “ASKI” accounts (foreign accounts for domestic payments).
445
May 24 From the German Ambassador
Acceptance of proposed draft for modification of article VII of the treaty of 1923, and enumeration of the reasons on which the German Government bases its proposal for the negotiation of a new trade agreement.
448
June 3 Agreement Between the United States and Germany Terminating Parts of Article VII of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Consular Rights of December 8, 1923
Text of agreement signed at Washington.
451
June 28 To the German Ambassador
Reply to German note of May 24, setting forth U. S. attitude on trade relations and willingness to negotiate a trade agreement contingent on a preliminary understanding relative to certain basic principles and considerations.
452
1935 Aug. 15 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
German Ambassador’s general comments on debts and trade agreement prospects, upon his return from a visit to Germany.
456
Aug. 23 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements of a Conversation With the First Secretary of the German Embassy and Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Résumé of argument advanced by Dr. Meyer in support of his request that notice of termination of tariff concessions to Germany be postponed for 30 days beyond October 14, 1935, when the existing most-favored-nation commitment expires.
457
Aug. 26 Memorandum by Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs to the Secretary of State
Counter-argument against postponement of notice discussed on August 23.
458
Aug. 29 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements of a Conversation With the First Secretary of the German Embassy and Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Discussion of Department’s decision against postponement of notice.
459
Sept. 26 Memorandum by Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld, of the Division of Western European Affairs, of a Conversation Between Dr. Karl Ritter, of the German Ministry for Foreign Affairs, and the Assistant Secretary of State
Comments of Dr. Ritter concerning his Government’s desire for improvement of trade relations with the United States.
461
Oct. 1 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Oral exchange of views with Dr. Ritter on U. S.-German trade relations.
464
Oct. 2 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with Dr. Ritter and Dr. Davidsen, German Foreign Office officials, concerning the impossibility of entering into a modus vivendi with Germany.
467
Oct. 4 Memorandum by Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Farewell interview of Dr. Ritter and Dr. Davidsen, who expressed regret that Germany would probably be unable for some time to meet U. S. prerequisites for entering into negotiations for a broad trade agreement.
468
Oct. 11 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Counselor of the German Embassy, who related intention of his Government to refrain from any action which would aggravate the difficulties now forestalling trade agreement negotiations.
470
Nov. 27 Memorandum by Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the German Ambassador, who denied the accuracy of a U. S. newspaper article referring to German export bounties and dumping in the United States.
471
1935 Dec. 2 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Explanation to the German Ambassador of Department’s objection to German subsidized steel exports to the United States.
472
Dec. 4 Memorandum by Mr. R. E. Schoenfeld, of the Division of Western European Affairs, of a Conversation With the First Secretary of the German Embassy and the Assistant Economic Adviser
Detailed exchange of views regarding German export promotion practices.
473
Dec. 6 From the German Ambassador
Memorandum of the major points covered in the conversation of November 27.
476

Efforts by the Department of State To Conclude the Settlement of Claims Under the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 4 To the German Ambassador
Hope that the German Agent will expedite completion of plans for his rebuttal evidence pertaining to the sabotage claims and the Drier case which have been pending before the Claims Commission for some time.
477
Feb. 21 (15) To the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Instructions to urge that the presentation of evidence be expedited.
478
Feb. 26 (32) From the Ambassador in Germany (tel.)
Foreign Office promise that instructions and first section of evidence will be forwarded to the German Embassy within a week.
478
Mar. 27 From the German Ambassador
German Agent’s intention to submit the remaining portion of his evidence shortly; opinion that the Drier case, well in hand, can be closed soon.
479
[May 24] From the German Embassy
Objection to a motion filed by the American Agent on May 2 regarding submission of additional evidence; alternative suggestion in this connection.
479
June 8 To the German Embassy
Opinion that the question of procedure in submitting further evidence should be left to the determination of the Commission.
480
Aug. 15 Memorandum by the Legal Adviser
Résumé of a conversation with the American Agent’s counsel concerning the present status of the sabotage cases.
481
[Page XLIII]

GERMANY

Representations by the German Government Against Anti-Nazi Activities in the United States

Date and number Subject Page
1935 June 28 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Request that the Department inquire into the matter of prohibition of display of the swastika flag at a gathering of American-German singing societies in Newark, New Jersey, as reported in a U. S. news article.
482
July 29 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the German Chargé who brought up a number of recent incidents in the United States which have caused resentment in Germany; particularly, the S. S. Bremen incident in which the swastika flag was torn from the staff of the ship just before sailing.
483
July 29 From the German Chargé
Formal representations relating to the S. S. Bremen incident.
485
Aug. 1 To the German Chargé
Reply to note of July 29, and transmittal of a full report, prepared by the New York police authorities, on the incident.
485
Aug. 12 To the German Ambassador
Transmittal of a report from the Governor of New Jersey regarding the Newark incident.
486
Sept. 7 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
German Ambassador’s protest against offensive utterances of a New York City judge relative to the German flag; Secretary’s promise to look into the matter, and reminder that such incidents stem from reaction to violent reports emanating from Germany.
487
Sept. 14 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Comments (text printed) made to the Counselor of the German Embassy as to Department’s deprecation of the irrelevant statements made by the New York magistrate in rendering his judicial decision on the S. S. Bremen incident.
489

GREECE

Unofficial Representations to the Greek Government for Moderate Treatment of Political Leaders on Trial for Participation in Unsuccessful Revolt

[Page XLIV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 14 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs
Résumé of consular reports indicating that no Americans were injured during the recent unsuccessful revolt led by former Prime Minister Venizelos against the present Greek Government.
491
Apr. 23 (55) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Advice that two generals were condemned to death; inquiry as to whether the Department desires the Minister to join his British and French colleagues in urging moderation by the Greek Government in the treatment of prisoners implicated in the revolt.
492
Apr. 24 (56) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Information that the two generals, condemned to death by court martial, were shot at dawn.
492
1935 Apr. 25 (26) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Permission for the Minister to act in his personal capacity if similar action is being taken by his British and French colleagues.
493
Apr. 25 (57) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Advice that the two generals were executed at the instance of a group within the Government who have seized control, bent upon revenge for the Venizelist revolt of 1922.
493
Apr. 27 (58) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Continuation of trial of former Premiers and political leaders; suggestion that the Department give publicity to the matter in order to strengthen the Government’s stand for moderation.
493
Apr. 27 (59) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Statement made to the Foreign Minister (text printed) subsequent to formal British and French representations; suggestions for use in the United States.
494
Apr. 28 (60) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Suggestion that the Department acquaint the new Greek Minister with the conversation reported in telegram No. 59, April 27.
495
Apr. 29 Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State
New Greek Minister’s first call, during which the Under Secretary expressed his personal views on the unfortunate trend of events in Greece.
495
Apr. 30 (28) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Advice that the Department has acted on certain suggestions contained in Minister’s telegrams Nos. 59 and 60, April 27 and 28.
496
May 1 (61) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Message from the Prime Minister (text printed), to be transmitted to Mr. Morgenthau (ex-Ambassador to Turkey), who had acted in accordance with a suggestion contained in telegram No. 59, April 27.
496
May 6 (65) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Report that the Government now has the situation under control; general opinion that moderation of the recalcitrant group is due largely to American, British, and French attitude.
496

Good Offices by the American Legation in Greece in Behalf of an American Citizen Arrested on Suspicion of Complicity in Revolution

[Page XLV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 10 (34) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Resume” of charges against Christopher Stephano, and request for instructions as to extent to which the Department may wish to insure protection.
497
Mar. 11 (12) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Desire to be kept informed of developments in Stephano case and any other similar cases.
498
1935 Mar. 15 (39) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Further developments in the Stephano case; advise that he is being treated with leniency.
498
Mar. 21 (42) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Opinion that formal inquiry should be made of the Greek Government as to the charges against Stephano, inasmuch as he has been accused of treason apparently without consideration of his American citizenship.
498
Mar. 22 (15) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Authorization to proceed according to suggestion; information as to proof of Stephano’s American citizenship, and further instructions.
(Footnote: Information that upon the Minister’s formal inquiry Stephano was released, but that no reply to the inquiry was received.)
499
May 3 (185) To the Minister in Greece
Commendation for the effective manner in which the case was handled.
499

Recognition by the United States of the Restoration of George II as King of Greece

[Page XLVI]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Oct. 11 (154) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Résumé of developments leading to a coup whereby the republican régime has been abolished and royal power vested in General Condylis pending a plebiscite on November 3 to restore the monarchial constitution of 1911.
500
Oct. 12 (155) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Further information concerning the coup.
500
Oct. 14 (156) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Request for instructions for reply to a Foreign Office note inviting the Chiefs of Mission to enter into relations with the new régime; advice that colleagues are replying in the usual fashion.
501
Oct. 14 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs
Conversation with the Greek Minister, who left a formal notice of the restoration of a monarchy in Greece and the revival of the Constitution of 1911.
501
Oct. 15 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs
Observations with respect to recognition of the new regime and draft instructions to be sent to the Minister in Greece.
502
Oct. 15 (68) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Approval of usual reply to Foriegn Office note of October 14, and instructions for formulation of the reply.
503
Oct. 30 (165) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Information that the King will reenter Athens on November 17; that the approaching plebiscite is expected merely to legalize decisions already taken.
504
1935 Nov. 4 (167) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Government’s announcement of Overwhelming victory for the monarchy as result of the plebiscite.
504
Nov. 6 (71) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Information that upon official notification that the King has assumed his duties, new letters of credence will be forwarded for the Minister’s presentation, provided British and French colleagues take similar action.
504
Nov. 11 (72) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Desire that the Minister attend ceremony for the King upon his return, provided certain colleagues plan to attend.
505
Nov. 29 From the Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs to the Chief of the Division of Protocol and Conferences
Inquiry into the matter of issuing new letters of credence to the Minister in Greece.
505
(Footnote: New letters of credence forwarded to the Minister in Greece on December 12, and new letters of credence left with the Secretary of State by the Greek Minister on December 18.) 506

Insistence by the United States Upon Greek Responsibility for the Service of American Loans to Greece Under the Agreements of May 10, 1929, and May 24, 1932

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 2 To the Greek Chargé
Acknowledgment of note No. 2738 of December 31, 1934, and statement of U. S. unaltered position on default of payments by a country due to indebtedness of a third country to it.
506
May 14 (32) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Instructions to ascertain whether the International Financial Commission has taken any action in the matter of the Greek Government’s nonpayment of the amount due May 10 under the provisions of part II of the debt agreements.
508
May 16 (69) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Information that although the Commission has made formal protest against Greek violation of statute regarding release of foreign exchange, no action has been taken with reference to the amount due the U. S. Government on May 10.
508
June 14 From the Greek Minister
Acknowledgment of statement of amount due under provisions of part I, and regret that circumstances prevent resumption of discussions toward settlement.
509
Sept. 30 To the Greek Minister
Inquiry as to when the Department may expect a reply to earlier request for payment of amount due May 10.
509
[Page XLVII]

GREECE

Representations on Behalf of Ulen and Company in Connection With Negotiations With the Greek Government Regarding Contract for Waterworks at Athens and the Piraeus

Date and number Subject Page
1934 July 6 (42) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Instructions to inform the Foreign Office of desire of Ulen and Co. to forestall any Greek Government action relative to a waterworks contract, pending the arrival in Athens of its local manager, R. W. Gausmann.
510
July 11 (70) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Foreign Minister’s agreement to withhold action pending Gausmann’s arrival.
511
July 12 (307) From the Minister in Greece
Information regarding the interview at which the postponement was secured.
511
Sept. 15 (376) From the Minister in Greece
Interview with Gausmann, who told of some progress in the case, but indicated that the matter is still in active dispute.
512
1935 Jan. 19 (7) From the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Request by Ulen officials for Legation’s intervention, should Greek Government action become precipitant.
513
Jan. 22 (3) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Opinion that intervention is not warranted under the circumstances.
513
July 2 (90) From the Chargé in Greece (tel.)
Inconclusive negotiations between the Greek Government and Ulen and Co.; opinion that the Government’s arbitrary attitude should not go unchallenged in view of possible effect on other American interests in the future.
514
July 5 (45) To the Minister in Greece (tel.)
Note to be presented to the Foreign Office (text printed), and instructions to urge expeditious and amicable settlement of the controversy.
515
July 11 (94) From the Chargé in Greece (tel.)
Foreign Minister’s promise to give the matter his personal attention.
516
July 27 (105) From the Chargé in Greece (tel.)
Information that a verbal compromise agreement has been reached between the Foreign Office and a Ulen representative.
(Footnote: Conclusion of written agreements, August 16, in accordance with previous verbal arrangement.)
516
[Page XLVIII]

ITALY

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Italy; Proposed Abrogation of Articles VI and XXIV of the Treaty of 1871

[Page XLIX] [Page L]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 7 To the Italian Embassy
Proposal for opening of negotiations looking toward a trade agreement, notwithstanding certain varying views previously expressed in exchange of aide-mémoires.
517
Jan. 7 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Italian Ambassador’s agreement with Department officials regarding procedure for initiating negotiations.
518
Jan. 12 From the Italian Embassy
Affirmative reply to aide-mémoire of January 7.
519
Feb. 1 (42) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Foreign Minister’s interest in forthcoming general trade negotiations, and his desire to discuss with the Ambassador the possibilities of cotton trade with the United States.
519
Feb. 3 (46) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Interview with Mussolini, who expressed immediate interest in opening discussions of cotton trade apart from the general trade negotiations.
520
Feb. 5 (17) To the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Reminder of certain points to be safeguarded in discussion of cotton proposal; request for fuller information and views regarding the nature of the proposal in the light of these comments.
520
Feb. 6 (54) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Explanation that points referred to by the Department were clarified previously, when Italian authorities informally made the proposal; request for further instructions.
522
Feb. 19 (80) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Establishment of new system of import control by Government decree, and explanation of ill effect upon certain American products.
523
Feb. 21 (84) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Observations as to reasons for the recent restrictive decree on imports; recommendations for U. S. action in this connection.
523
Mar. 5 (37) To the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Necessity for formulating a definite policy on generalization of concessions to third countries in connection with broad trade agreements program before any decision can be made regarding the Italian trade problem.
524
Mar. 6 (98) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Résumé of comments from certain Chiefs of Missions concerning unsatisfactory trade relations with Italy; reiteration of opinion as to necessity for some definite action against Italian restrictive measures.
524
Mar. 16 Memorandum by the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Explanation to the Italian Ambassador of U. S. policy on generalization of concessions to third countries, and presentation to him of an aide-mémoire (infra) in this connection.
525
1935 Undated To the Italian Embassy
Aide-mémoire questioning the useful purpose of proceeding with trade negotiations in view of Italian announcement of drastic restrictive measures which affect American commerce.
526
Mar. 19 (137) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Opinion that the Italian Government is losing interest in the prospective trade agreement; that U. S. Government should exert every effort to bring about modification of the rigid policy now being pursued by Italy.
527
Apr. 2 (176) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Request for specific information as to application of the generalization clause, particularly in the light of possible abrogation of the Italo-American commercial treaty.
528
Apr. 4 (66) To the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Explanation of points raised in Ambassador’s telegram No. 176, April 2.
528
Apr. 6 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Italian Ambassador, who left an aide-mémoire (infra) setting forth Italian position.
529
Apr. 6 From the Italian Embassy
Italian Government’s desire to proceed with trade agreement negotiations, and denial of intention to discriminate against American trade.
530
Apr. 22 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Explanation by Assistant Secretary Sayre to the Italian Ambassador of U. S. commercial policy, and suggestions for further exchange of views.
531
Undated [Rec’d May 14] Substance of Cables From the Italian Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the Italian Ambassador
Foreign Office opinion, upon consideration of Italian Ambassador’s reports, that major points of difference can be reconciled; instructions in this connection.
532
May 27 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Favorable discussion of Foreign Office communications (supra) with the Italian Ambassador.
533
July 17 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation between Assistant Secretary Sayre and the Italian Ambassador on question of eliminating by mutual agreement articles VI and XXIV of the commercial treaty of 1871.
534
July 24 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Observations by the Italian Commercial Attaché upon his return from a trip to Italy to ascertain his Government’s views on the proposed trade negotiations.
535
1935 July 25 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Exchange of views between the Italian Ambassador and Department officials concerning trade agreement matters and the denunciation proposal.
537
July 29 Telegram From the Italian Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the Italian Ambassador
Definition of Foreign Office views On the major questions at issue.
539
July 29 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Italian Ambassador’s comments on contents of Foreign Office telegram.
540
Aug. 9 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Italian Commercial Attaché who reiterated his Government’s argument for proceeding with trade agreement negotiations without bringing up the question of denunciation of articles VI and XXIV.
541
Aug. 20 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Unfavorable view of Italian Ambassador’s replies to questions advanced for the purpose of clarifying U. S. understanding of the Italian position on the pending trade conversations.
542
Nov. 6 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Explanation to the Italian Ambassador of reasons for U. S. decision against entrance into intensive trade negotiations at present.
543

Representations by the Department of State Regarding Fascist Propaganda Activities of Certain Italian Consular Officers in the United States

[Page LI]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 20 To the Italian Embassy
Suggestion that certain Italian consular officers in the United States be transferred to some other country in view of increasing U. S. public resentment against their Fascist activities.
543
Feb. 28 (374) To the Ambassador in Italy
Transmittal of copy of aide-mémoire (supra) and other data on Fascist activities, and instructions to use these as a basis for urging Foreign Office compliance with Department’s suggestions.
545
Feb. 28 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Italian Ambassador’s inquiry as to whether the Department will modify suggestions contained in aide-mémoire of February 20, in view of certain points raised in a telegram to him from Mussolini.
546
1935 Mar. 15 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Explanation to the Italian Ambassador of Department’s reasons for making the suggestions of February 20.
548
Mar. 20 (139) From the Ambassador in Italy (tel.)
Detailed discussion with the Foreign Office of questions still unanswered relative to Fascist propaganda in the United States.
549
Apr. 9 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Italian Ambassador, who brought word of Foreign Office acceptance of Department’s suggestions.
550
June 6 Memorandum by Mr. Joseph C. Green of the Division of Western European Affairs
Advice from the Counselor of the Italian Embassy of scheduled departure of the Vice Consul at Detroit, whose transfer had been requested by the Department.
551

LATVIA

Representations Regarding Alleged Discrimination Against American Trade in Latvia

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 6 (10) To the Chargé in Latvia (tel.)
Instructions to expedite submission of comprehensive report on present treatment of American trade in Latvia as previously requested.
552
Mar. 14 (645) From the Chargé in Latvia
Transmittal of report requested; interpretative comments, and conclusion that Latvian efforts to reduce certain imports from United States have been without serious results.
552
Aug. 16 (160) To the Chargé in Latvia
Instructions to hand the Foreign Minister a note (text printed) setting forth general principles of U. S. commercial policy and requesting statement of Latvian policy toward trade with the United States.
554
Sept. 13 (870) From the Chargé in Latvia
Inconclusive discussion with the Foreign Minister of the contents of U.S. note upon its delivery to him, September 11.
559
Oct. 3 (902) From the Chargé in Latvia
Report on conversations with various Latvian authorities on treatment of American trade in Latvia, and observations in this connection.
562
[Page LII]

LITHUANIA

Representations Regarding Alleged Discrimination Against American Trade in Lithuania

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 6 (5) To the Minister in Lithuania (tel.)
Instructions to submit a comprehensive report on the present treatment of American trade in Lithuania.
566
Feb. 14 (183) From the Minister in Lithuania
Opinion that whatever discrimination against American trade exists in Lithuania, as well as in Estonia and Latvia, is not willful; recommendation that any contemplated action be withheld pending certain developments.
566
Feb. 23 (184) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Observations as to the purpose of certain new restrictive measures on imports to Lithuania and their possible effect upon American trade.
568
May 15 (240 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Transmittal of comprehensive report as requested in Department’s telegram No. 5, February 6.
569
July 19 (8) To the Chargé in Lithuania (tel.)
Instructions to request a written Foreign Office statement as to Lithuanian attitude toward imports of petroleum products from the United States and intended policy on issuance of import licenses covering such products.
570
July 27 (285 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Foreign Office promise of early reply to request for written statement.
571
Aug. 1 (288 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Further developments in the petroleum situation.
571
Aug. 20 (9) To the Chargé in Lithuania (tel.)
Indication of Department’s position in connection with any system in Lithuania for control of importation of petroleum products.
572
Aug. 20 (299 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Substance of Foreign Office statement of its attitude toward importation into Lithuania of American petroleum products, and observations in this connection.
572
Sept. 7 (51) To the Chargé in Lithuania
Instructions as to position to be taken by the Legation in relation to further developments in the petroleum situation.
574
Sept. 20 (314 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Results of recent negotiations between the Lithuanian authorities and representatives of American oil interests.
575
Dec. 30 (395 Diplo.) From the Chargé in Lithuania
Decision of stockholders to liquidate the local Standard Oil organization, and reasons therefor; comments on this latest development.
576
(Note: Subsequent report from the Chargé, October 1936, relative to sale of entire investment of Standard Oil in Lithuania.) 578
[Page LIII]

NETHERLANDS

Reciprocal Trade Agreement Between the United States and The Netherlands, Signed December 20, 1935

[Page LIV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 11 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Discussion with the Netherland Minister of date for exchange of desiderata and other procedures connected with opening of negotiations for a trade agreement.
579
Jan. 11 (139) From the Chargé in the Netherlands
Receipt of information that the forthcoming trade conversations are viewed with pessimism by certain Netherland officials due to belief that the Netherlands will be unable to offer any real concessions to the United States.
579
Mar. 21 (10) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Information that a proposal has been made to the Netherland Legation for an immediate exchange of notes to prevent denial to the Netherlands of the benefits of the Belgian agreement about to be proclaimed.
581
Mar. 30 (12) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Explanation to the Netherland Legation of a new procedure to be used instead of the proposed exchange of notes.
582
Apr. 4 (13) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Netherland Chargérs “after-the-fact” complaint against the new procedure used; instructions for discussion of the misunderstanding with Mr. Lamping, Netherland expert to be sent to the United States in connection with the forthcoming negotiations.
582
Apr. 5 (27) From the Chargé in the Netherlands (tel.)
Satisfactory conversation with Lamping regarding the misunderstanding.
584
May 3 Memorandum by the the First Secretary of Legation in the Netherlands
Conversation with Lamping concerning possible Netherland request for postponement of trade negotiations with the United States due to other outstanding negotiations already scheduled for the summer.
584
May 15 (20) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Exchange of desiderata with the Netherland Chargé.
585
May 31 (24) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Instructions to discuss with the Foreign Office the Department’s desire to avoid delay of negotiations in view of the present favorable situation.
585
June 20 (44) From the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Cabinet decision to send Lamping or substitute to Washington in early July for short preliminary discussions.
586
June 20 (27) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Instructions to inform the Foreign Office of Department’s hope that the conversations will not be restricted in scope but will be continued until an agreement is concluded.
586
June 21 (45) From the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Explanation of difficulties to be expected in negotiations due to difference in scope of the two lists of desiderata; advice that the Netherland delegation will arrive in Washington in August.
587
1935 June 22 (46) From the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Reason for Netherland reaction to U. S. list of desiderata.
588
June 26 (28) To the Minister in the Netherlands (tel.)
Opinion that the Netherlands Government is overemphasizing difficulties; that the matter can be adjusted satisfactorily during the forthcoming trade negotiations.
588
Aug. 8 (270) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Cabinet decision to send full Netherland delegation to the United States immediately in view of satisfactory results of preliminary conversations.
589
(Note: Citation to text of agreement signed December 20.) 590

Proposal for the Establishment of a Reciprocal Air Navigation Arrangement Between the United States and The Netherlands

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Apr. 8 (194) From the Chargé in the Netherlands
Note delivered to the Foreign Minister February 12 (text printed) explaining U. S. policy of omitting certain prohibited areas from the air navigation agreements to which the United States becomes a party.
590
May 13 (216) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Foreign Office reply, May 10 (text printed), stating Netherland views on prohibited areas.
592
July 17 (160) To the Minister in the Netherlands
Detailed instructions as to U. S. position on the question of the right of flight over prohibited areas, and proposal in this connection for modification of article 2 of the arrangement under discussion.
594
Sept. 10 (283) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Foreign office acceptance in principle of Department’s new proposals and explanations as outlined in a note delivered on September 10.
602
(Note: Information that no further correspondence on the subject of this proposed agreement has been found in the Department files.) 603

Policy of the United States Not To Encourage Export Trade in Arms, Ammunition, and Implements of War

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Aug. 24 (276) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Netherland inquiry as to the possibility of purchasing American armored tanks for Army use; request for instructions as to whether such inquiries should be encouraged by the Legation.
603
Sept. 11 (183) To the Minister in the Netherlands
Explanation of the Department’s policy not to encourage export trade in war materials.
604
[Page LV]

NETHERLANDS

Assurance to the Netherlands Government That the Island op Palmas Is Recognized as Netherland Territory Despite the Wording of the Constitution of the Philippine Commonwealth

Date and number Subject Page
1935 July 10 (2257) From the Netherland Minister
Request for written statement establishing the understanding that the Island of Miangas (Palmas) is not comprised within the limits as set by article III of the Philippine constitution.
605
July 17 To the Netherland Minister
Concurrence in the understanding as set forth by the Netherland Minister.
606

Discussion Respecting an Arrangement Between the United States and the Netherlands and Netherlands Indian Government for the Prevention of Double Taxation

Date and number Subject Page
1934 Aug. 6 (2197) From the Netherland Minister
Inquiry by the Netherlands Indian Government as to whether the U. S. Government will enter into a reciprocal arrangement for the prevention of double taxation; transmittal of copy of ordinance of the Netherlands Indian Government.
606
Oct. 16 To the Netherland Chargé
Advice that the ordinance in question does not satisfy the requirements of the U. S. Revenue Acts of 1932 and 1934.
607
Nov. 2 (2948) From the Netherland Chargé
Request for full information as to the particular types of income which are considered not to be covered in the list of credit allowances contained in the ordinance.
608
1935 Jan. 26 To the Netherland Minister
Transmittal of information as requested, and offer to arrange for further discussion of the question with a Treasury Department official if desired.
609
Sept. 25 (3095) From the Netherland Minister
Observations of the Netherland Minister of Finance; expression of doubt, in the light of these comments, that the U. S. Government can justify its view as previously set forth.
610

Efforts To Obtain Equal Treatment for the United Press Associations in the Distribution of Its News Service in the Netherlands East Indies

[Page LVI]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Oct. 25 (310) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Aide-mémoire left at the Foreign Office (text printed) setting forth certain difficulties encountered by the United Press and requesting information in the matter.
613
Nov. 13 (50) To the Chargé in the Netherlands (tel.)
Instructions for supplementing the aide-mémoire by reference to the Telecommunication Convention of 1932.
615
Nov. 15 (321) From the Chargé in the Netherlands
Observations on new developments in the press question.
616
1936 Mar. 9 (377) From the Minister in the Netherlands
Advice that no reply has been received to aide-mémoire of October 25, despite repeated oral representations, but indication that investigation of the question is under way.
617
Dec. 3 (595) From the Chargé in the Netherlands
Observations on unsatisfactory progress in the United Press controversy, and request for further instructions.
(Footnote: Information that the Department apparently issued no further instructions in the matter.)
618

NORWAY

Preliminary Discussions Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Norway

[Page LVII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 29 From the Norwegian Minister
Disappointment at Treasury Department’s nonacceptance of the Norwegian interpretation that the recent U. S. whale oil tax should be considered an excise tax rather than an import tax.
620
Feb. 5 Memorandum of a Conversation Between the Assistant Secretary of State, the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs, and the Norwegian Minister
Explanation to the Norwegian Minister, upon inquiry, that the President’s decision regarding the possibility of seeking legislative relief for whale oil is awaited.
621
Mar. 12 Memorandum by the Economic Adviser
Personal exchange of views with the Norwegian Minister concerning a possible commercial agreement between the two countries.
621
Apr. 16 Memorandum of a Conversation Between the Assistant Secretary of State, the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs, and the Norwegian Minister
Norwegian Minister’s presentation of a memorandum enumerating his reasons for favoring the Tonry Bill (H. R. 7373) to repeal the excise tax on whale oil.
623
May 29 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Conversation with the Norwegian Minister, who stated his Government’s desire to negotiate a trade agreement with the United States, and its hope for settlement of the whale oil question prior to entering into such negotiations.
624
June 3 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Further comments by the Norwegian Minister on trade agreement possibilities and prospects for passage of H. R. 7373.
(Footnote: Information that the President authorized Secretary Hull to recommend to the appropriate House Committee favorable consideration of the bill in question.)
624
Aug. 6 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Norwegian Minister regarding support of H. R. 7373.
624
1935 Aug. 14 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Norwegian Minister’s intimation of his Government’s desire to conclude a trade agreement regardless of the outcome of the pending legislation.
625
Dec. 3 Memorandum of a Conversation Between the Assistant Secretary of State, the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs, and the Norwegian Minister
New suggestion offered by the Norwegian Minister concerning support of the whale oil legislation.
626
1936 Jan. 8 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Norwegian Minister, who was assured of the support of the Department in his new suggestion.
627

Renewed Representations Respecting the Exemption From Taxation of the American Legation Property in Oslo

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 26 (282) To the Chargé in Norway
Instructions to renew representations to the Foreign Office in the matter of exemption from taxation of the Legation’s property on the basis of reciprocity.
627
Sept. 9 (1) From the Minister in Norway
Transmittal of Foreign Office note indicating that the taxation question is under consideration with hope for a satisfactory solution.
(Footnote: Information that the foreign Legations were subsequently informed by the Norwegian Government that legislation had been obtained effecting the exemptions requested.
628

POLAND

Representations Regarding Alleged Discrimination Against American Trade in Poland

[Page LVIII]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 27 (10) To the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Instructions to ascertain the official Polish attitude, generally, toward U.S. liberalized commercial policy with the question in mind of extending to Poland concessions accorded to other countries through trade agreements, and particularly, toward American trade in the light of existing treaty provisions.
629
Mar. 8 (624) From the Ambassador in Poland
Foreign Minister’s promise of a preliminary reply within 3 days to a memorandun left by the Ambassador in compliance with instruction No. 10, February 27.
631
Mar. 11 (18) From the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Foreign Office decision to send a comprehensive reply, now in preparation, instead of the preliminary reply.
632
1935 Mar. 21 (638) From the Ambassador in Poland
Foreign Office note verbale, March 16 (text printed), in harsh reply to Ambassador’s earlier memorandum; transmittal of a report on Polish treatment of U. S. imports, and observations thereon.
632
Mar. 22 (18) To the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Instructions for supplementary conversations to iron out the misunderstanding as reflected by the tone of the Polish reply.
638
May 12 (185) To the Ambassador in Poland
Draft note (text printed) to be presented to the Polish Government, explaining in detail the U. S, position in the premises with hope of removing the misunderstanding.
639
June 5 (726) From the Chargé in Poland
Presentation of note to the Foreign Office Under Secretary, and his approval of arrangement to discuss the contents with other Polish Government officials.
647
July 1 (750) From the Chargé in Poland
Memorandum (text printed) describing interview with the Under Secretary of State in the Ministry of Industry and Commerce.
648
Oct. 30 (889) From the Ambassador in Poland
Foreign Office memorandum (text printed) in reply to U.S. note of June 5; opinion that it constitutes as satisfactory a statement as can be obtained.
651

Non-Applicability of Polish Regulations Concerning Social Insurance to Employees of the American Embassy and Consulates in Poland

Date and number Subject Page
1934 Dec. 12 (138) To the Ambassador in Poland
Explanation of U. S. view that the Polish Government cannot impose upon the U. S. Embassy any obligations with respect to the payment of certain social insurance premiums on its own account or on behalf of its Polish employees.
658
Dec. 27 (59) From the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Inquiry as to the status of American employees of the Embassy in connection with the Polish law.
660
1935 Jan. 4 (1) To the Ambassador in Poland (tel.)
Non-applicability of the Polish law to American personnel of the Embassy.
661
[Page LIX]

PORTUGAL

Discussions Between the United States and Portugal of a Possible Exchange of Notes Providing for Most-Favored-Nation Treatment With Respect to Shipping

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 22 (1) To the Minister in Portugal (tel.)
Discussion with the Portuguese Minister of the application of U. S. commercial policy as it will affect Portugal in view of its discriminatory treatment of U. S. shipping; hope that satisfactory adjustment can be made by an exchange of notes prior to termination of the existing modus vivendi.
662
Mar. 30 (2) To the Minister in Portugal (tel.)
Further discussion with the Portuguese Minister, who expressed hope for delay of notice of termination of the modus vivendi in order to work toward some adjustment of the present shipping discrimination.
663
Mar. 31 (4) From the Minister in Portugal (tel.)
Opinion that firm insistence should be made upon abolition of Portuguese flag discrimination pending negotiations.
663
Apr. 5 (3) To the Minister in Portugal (tel.)
Instructions to talk to appropriate authorities with a view to rectifying press reports that Portugal will be excluded from benefits resulting from the recent U. S.-Belgian agreement.
664
Apr. 6 (6) From the Minister in Portugal (tel.)
Advice that explanation has been made according to instructions, and that a suitable Foreign Office statement will be issued to the press.
664
Apr. 19 (595) From the Minister in Portugal
Opinion as to the unlikelihood of Portuguese denunciation of the existing modus vivendi as feared by importers of American automobiles.
664
May 22 Memorandum by the Minister in Portugal, Temporarily in Washington
Conclusion, after informal talks with Portuguese Officials, that Portugal would probably agree to abolition of flag discrimination pending consideration of a more permanent agreement.
665
June 28 (672) From the Chargé in Portugal
Opinion that a forthcoming decree for the regulation of imports into Portugal is aimed at the United States in retaliation against U. S. suspension of Portuguese imports of sardines of excessive lead content.
666
July 16 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Discussion with the Portuguese Minister regarding his suggested quid pro quo in connection with the possible development of an exchange of notes to correct Portuguese flag discrimination.
667
Aug. 5 (701) From the Minister in Portugal
Explanation to the Foreign Office of the reasons for U. S. action in exclusion of Portuguese sardines from the American market.
668
Sept. 4 (734) From the Minister in Portugal
Suggestion for strengthening the Portuguese Minister’s efforts in urging satisfactory adjustment of the problem of flag discrimination.
669
[Page LX]

RUMANIA

Representations Against Restrictions Imposed Upon the Importation of American Merchandise by the Rumanian Government

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Mar. 2 (3) From the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Foreign Office note (text printed) announcing intention to prohibit American imports pending conclusion of an arrangement with the United States.
671
Mar. 7 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Near Eastern Affairs
Understanding that the Rumanian Minister has pointed out to his Government the impropriety of its action against U. S. imports in the absence of any proper denunciation of the existing U. S.-Rumanian commercial agreement.
671
Mar. 11 (1) To the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Statement (text printed) to be incorporated in note of protest to the Foreign Office.
(Footnote: Delivery of note, dated March 14.)
672
Mar. 22 (2) To the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Instructions to report on status of authorizations for American imports and also on Rumanian Government’s reaction to the U. S. note.
673
Mar. 25 (4) From the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Advice that suspension of authorization for American imports still obtains, but that American merchandise is still being admitted under certain conditions.
674
Apr. 20 (6) From the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Substance of Foreign Office reply (April 20) to U. S. note of March 14.
674
Apr. 24 (7) From the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Suggestions for reply to the Rumanian note pending preparation of Department’s formal reply.
675
Apr. 27 (5) To the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Instructions for interim reply if considered necessary before Department’s study is completed.
675
June 6 (13) To the Minister in Rumania (tel.)
Formal reply (text printed) to Foreign Office note of April 20, expressing hope for establishment of a common basis for trade negotiations despite present fundamental differences in commercial policies.
676
(Note: Reference to subsequent correspondence revealing conditions prohibitive to better trade relations between the two countries.) 678

Good Offices on Behalf of the Rumanian Subsidiary of the International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation Following Search by Rumanian Authorities

[Page LXI]
Date and number Subject Page
1934 Dec. 8 (204) From the Chargé in Rumania
Report of a dispute between the American-owned Rumanian telephone company and the Rumanian Government, precipitating an official search of the company’s Bucharest premises and of the private residence of its American managing director.
678
1934 Dec. 21 (211) From the Chargé in Rumania
Report on developments in the controversy; indications that a satisfactory settlement of the case has apparently been effected.
681
1935 Jan. 17 (94) To the Chargé in Rumania
Commendation for effective response to the American company’s need for assistance.
684
Jan. 24 (221) From the Chargé in Rumania
Transmittal of an official communiqué issued by the Ministry of the Interior, absolving the American company of all charges in the matter at issue.
684
Feb. 5 (96) To the Chargé in Rumania
Instructions to inform appropriate officials of U. S. unfavorable view of Rumanian Government’s asserted right of its military authorities to search an American citizen’s domicile without displaying proper orders from the competent authorities.
685
Feb. 23 (234) From the Chargé in Rumania
Transmittal of note to the Foreign Office, placing on official record the Department’s views, following a conversation in this connection with the managing director of the telephone company.
686

SPAIN

Negotiations Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Spain

[Page LXII] [Page LXIII] [Page LXIV] [Page LXV]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 3 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Explanation to the Spanish Ambassador of U. S. attitude toward forthcoming trade negotiations with his Government, and advice that U. S. list of desiderata will be ready by January 15.
687
Jan. 16 To the Spanish Ambassador
Transmittal of list of desiderata, and comments as to the nature of general provisions which the United States will suggest for inclusion in the proposed agreement.
688
Jan. 16 From the Spanish Embassy
Memorandum setting forth statistics on unfavorable trade balance of Spain with the world.
689
Jan. 19 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Discussion between Department officials and the Spanish Ambassador of the Spanish Embassy’s memorandum of January 16 with a view to reconciling the attitudes of the two Governments toward most-favored-nation policy and quotas.
690
Jan. 24 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Presentation to the Spanish Ambassador of a list of Spanish exports which the U. S. Government would consider in connection with the question of tariff reduction.
692
1935 Jan. 26 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Spanish Ambassador’s comments on the list of products handed to him and on the general provisions outlined in the U. S. note of January 16.
693
Jan. 30 (11) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Report of crisis in current Franco-Spanish trade negotiations due to French demand for practically exclusive rights for sale of automobiles in Spain.
694
Jan. 31 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Spanish Ambassador, who commented on the wide difference between the two lists of desiderata recently exchanged.
694
Jan. 31 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Efforts of the Spanish Ambassador to obtain modification of U. S. request for concessions.
695
Feb. 7 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Lengthy discussion of the general aspects of trade negotiations, ending with the Spanish Ambassador’s promise to explore the question of granting concessions beyond most-favored-nation treatment for American products entering Spain.
696
Feb. 15 (13) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Imminence of establishment of quota regime with respect to automobiles as a concession to French demand.
697
Feb. 19 (13) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Instructions to inform appropriate authorities of the unfavorable effect which the contemplated action would have upon U. S.-Spanish trade agreement negotiations.
698
Feb. 19 (14) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Supplementary comments to be used in connection with telegraphic instruction No. 13, February 19.
698
Feb. 21 (14) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Oral representations to the Foreign Minister as instructed, and his intimation that certain market assurances would strengthen the Spanish position against French demands.
699
Mar. 13 Memorandum of a Conversation Between the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs and the Counselor of the Spanish Embassy
Explanation to Mr. Yruja, upon inquiry, of U. S. preference for consideration of the complete lists of desiderata rather than a few individual items at a time.
700
Mar. 27 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Spanish Ambassador’s promise to urge his Government to expedite his instructions in order that trade negotiations might proceed.
701
Apr. 24 (19) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Advice that the Embassy will be kept informed of the progress of the trade negotiations which are now ready to begin.
703
1935 Apr. 29 (24) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Comment as to the opportuneness of hastening negotiations in view of breakdown in Franco-Spanish trade conversations.
703
May 2 (25) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Receipt of certain Foreign Office assurances with respect to the operation of a new decree which places automobiles on a contingent basis without as yet fixing total import quota.
703
May 6 (27) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Comments on implementation of the decree relative to automobiles, and Foreign Office hope that U. S.-Spanish negotiations will be expedited.
704
May 6 (24) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Advice that negotiations are still in preliminary stage but that daily meetings are being held to speed up the proceedings.
704
May 17 (28) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Résumé of unsatisfactory status of negotiations to date, and instructions to remind the Foreign Office that continuation of unyielding Spanish attitude toward concessions to U. S. trade may result in a loss of generous U. S. concessions to Spain.
705
May 17 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation between Assistant Secretary Sayre and the Spanish Ambassador to clarify the issues involved in the negotiations.
706
May 21 (33) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Oral representations in accordance with telegraphic instruction No. 28, May 17; suggestions for ironing out certain difficulties in the negotiations.
708
May 22 (767) From the Chargé in Spain
Recommendations with regard to U. S. position on the question of quotas for importation of automobiles into Spain.
709
May 28 (37) From the Chargé in Spain (tel.)
Conversations with certain Spanish officials regarding difficulties encountered in the negotiations.
710
June 1 (39) From the Chargé in Spain (tel.)
Opinion that Spain desires to expedite the American treaty, but is attempting to play one country against another in her simultaneous negotiations with other countries.
711
June 19 (795) From the Chargé in Spain
Foreign Office optimistic report of progress in the American negotiations.
712
June 22 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Concurrence in the Spanish Ambassador’s suggestion that each side present the maximum concessions which it is willing to accord; understanding, however, that U. S. concessions will be conditioned upon Spanish guarantee of a certain import quota on automobiles.
712
July 12 (47) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Report of retaliatory action against French products following breakdown in Franco-Spanish negotiations; prediction of similar action against U. S. products should negotiations fail.
714
1935 July 16 (45) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Conversation with the Spanish Ambassador, who was told that his Government’s offer on automobile import quota is unacceptable in view of substantial concessions which the U. S. Government is prepared to make to Spain.
714
July 18 (48) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Strong recommendations for acceptance of the Spanish compromise on automobile quota, and observations in this connection.
715
Aug. 8 (51) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Résumé of U. S. offer, August 7, stipulating increased concessions to Spain and revised guarantees from Spain.
716
Aug. 14 (53) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Intention to ascertain from the Foreign Office whether exchange insurance recently extended to certain countries will also be extended to U. S. imports.
717
Aug. 17 (54) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Foreign Office explanation that exchange insurance policy is experimental with four countries and may be extended to all countries if successful.
717
Aug. 17 (55) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Conversation with Foreign Office official, who outlined new instructions to be sent to the Spanish Ambassador; recommendation that every consideration be given his revised proposals.
718
Sept. 3 (54) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Instructions to renew oral representations on the question of exchange insurance and to ascertain reason for non-reply to U. S. offer of August 7.
718
Sept. 7 (57) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Promise of Foreign Office to take up the matter of exchange insurance; explanation of delay in reply to offer of August 7.
719
Sept. 13 (58) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Reiteration of recommendations set forth in telegram No. 48 of July 18 in view of content of latest instructions to the Spanish Ambassador regarding maximum Spanish offer on automobile quota.
720
Sept. 13 (57) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Information that the Ambassador’s recommendations are being carefully considered in connection with final list of Spanish concessions, but that no decision has been reached as yet.
720
Sept. 19 (60) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Reply to previous inquiry regarding nature of a Treasury Department mission to certain countries seeking U. S. loans, including Spain; instructions to try to forestall any discussion of financial arrangements until trade agreement negotiations are completed.
720
Sept. 20 (60) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Efforts to secure Foreign Office reconsideration of offer of August 7; further recommendations supplementary to telegram No. 48 of July 18.
722
1935 Sept. 27 (64) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Request for verification of press report of extension of period during which certain tariff reductions will continue to be accorded to Spain.
(Footnote: Verification of the press report.)
722
Oct. 9 (67) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Instructions for reply to inquiries of American firms seeking to extend credits to Spain for the liquidation of blocked capital funds.
723
Oct. 10 (68) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Interview with an official of the Bank of Spain, who concurred in Department’s view regarding deferment of the loan question.
723
Oct. 16 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with the Spanish Ambassador concerning details of completing treaty negotiations.
724
Oct. 23 Draft Trade Agreement Between the United States and Spain
Text, to be signed at Washington.
724
Undated Original Spanish Draft Note Regarding the Labeling of Sherry
Proposed designation of origin of certain wines to safeguard Spanish products.
732
Undated American Draft Note Regarding the Labeling of Sherry
Understanding that the Federal Alcohol Administration will issue regulations on January 1, 1936, in accordance with the Spanish proposal.
732
Undated Alternate American Draft Note Regarding the Labeling of Sherry
Alternate text of understanding.
733
Nov. 4 (940) From the Ambassador in Spain
Understanding that the Spanish Ambassador will arrive in Madrid for discussion of treaty terms; inquiry as to exact status of negotiations in order that the Embassy may assist in promoting conclusion.
733
Nov. 26 (72) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Information that compelte agreement has been reached with the exception of a few points of the general provisions on which the Spanish Government may hesitate; that further action by the Embassy is not considered necessary as yet.
734
Dec. 11 (981) From the Ambassador in Spain
Arrival of the Spanish Ambassador, who appears optimistic over prospects of successful conclusion of the treaty; intention to discuss treaty provisions with him on December 12.
735
Dec. 12 (77) To the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Instructions to renew representations, at Embassy’s discretion, on question of exchange insurance.
736
Dec. 16 (985) From the Ambassador in Spain
Renewal of representations regarding exchange insurance.
737
Dec. 28 (81) From the Ambassador in Spain (tel.)
Understanding that exchange problem is adequately covered in pending commercial agreement; opinion that conclusion of agreement should be expedited in view of this and other developments.
738
[Page LXVI]

SWEDEN

Reciprocal Trade Agreement Between the United States and Sweden, Signed May 25, 1935

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Feb. 7 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Explanation to the Swedish Minister of reasons for slow progress of trade agreement negotiations.
739
Mar. 30 To the Swedish Minister
U. S. readiness to discuss possible concessions on Swedish products with the understanding that any U. S. proposals will be subject to the approval of the President.
739
Apr. 29 Memorandum by Mr. Charles F. Darlington, of the Trade Agreements Section, for the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Swedish Commercial Counselor, who expressed desire, in connection with the trade agreement, for written assurance of extension of certain principles of the Antidumping Act of 1921.
740
May 2 Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State
Conversation with the Swedish Minister, who commented on the satisfactory course of negotiations and indicated that he had made the last effort possible from the Swedish point of view.
741
May 25 To the Swedish Minister
U. S. willingness, as previously expressed, to enter into separate negotiations for a treaty on shipping at Sweden’s convenience.
(Footnote: Information that no such treaty was negotiated.)
742
May 25 To the Swedish Minister
Assurance that the Department will continue to bear in mind Swedish representations made in regard to the rigidity and complexity of U. S. customs laws.
742
May 25 From the Swedish Minister
Acknowledgment of note of May 25 concerning separate treaty on shipping.
743
May 25 From the Swedish Minister
Appreciation of sympathetic view toward representations on U. S. customs laws.
743
(Note: Citation to texts of agreement and statements relative to its signature and application.) 744

SWITZERLAND

Negotiations Respecting a Trade Agreement Between the United States and Switzerland

[Page LXVII] [Page LXVIII] [Page LXIX]
Date and number Subject Page
1935 Jan. 31 (7) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Request for instructions for reply to Swiss contention that uncertainty of future value of the dollar will be a serious obstacle to concluding a trade agreement with the United States.
745
Feb. 1 (10) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Advice that Department has in mind a provision for modification of the treaty to meet the question mentioned in Minister’s telegram No. 7, January 31.
745
1935 Apr. 13 Memorandum by the Chief of the Trade Agreements Section
Explanation to the Swiss Minister of U. S. reasons for placing Switzerland on the list of countries which discriminate against American trade.
746
May 9 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with the Swiss Minister regarding points to be discussed prior to the arrival in the United States of Walter Stucki, Swiss economic expert.
746
May 9 To the Swiss Minister
Transmittal of U. S. list of desiderata, and understanding that Swiss list of desiderata will be presented to the Minister in Berne on the same day.
(Footnote: Information that Swiss list was received by the Legation on May 9.)
747
June 7 Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State
Exchange of views with Stucki, in the presence of the Swiss Minister, concerning the difference in policies adopted by the two countries to promote economic recovery.
748
June 7 Memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Western European Affairs
Exchange of views between U. S. and Swiss negotiators relative to trade between the two countries.
750
June 10 (25) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Request for brief summary of developments when Stucki’s visit to the United States has terminated.
753
June 13 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Résumé of the fifth meeting with the Swiss negotiators, during which a Swiss counter-draft to the proposed agreement was presented and was discussed point by point.
753
June 14 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Résumé of the sixth meeting, during which opposite views were expressed on the question of prevention of smuggling of Swiss watch movements into the United States, and Stucki was informed of U. S. preliminary reaction to the scope of Swiss concessions.
755
June 14 (44) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Résumé of topics discussed with Stucki, and intention to send full data to be used in further discussions with him upon his return to Switzerland.
758
July 9 (3956) From the Minister in Switzerland
Summary of Stucki’s observations on the recent negotiations; his disappointment, in this connection, upon learning of pending U. S. legislation (McCormack Bill) relative to importation of watch movements.
759
Aug. 14 (52) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Instructions to inform Stucki of Department’s displeasure at release from Swiss sources of confidential U. S. offer for duty reductions on watches, and to stress the necessity for immediate conclusion of the agreement.
761
1935 Aug. 20 (34) From the Chargé in Switzerland (tel.)
Stucki’s concurrence as to the advisability of hastening conclusion of the agreement.
762
Sept. 11 From the Swiss Chargé
Inquiry as to whether the U. S. Government will extend the period during which certain tariff concessions proclaimed in connection with trade agreements with other countries will continue to be accorded to Switzerland.
763
Sept. 17 To the Swiss Chargé
Expectation that the President will direct the Secretary of Treasury to extend the period referred to in note of September 11.
763
Sept. 24 (63) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Instructions to inform Stucki of increased difficulties resulting from disclosure of U. S. offer of duty concessions on watches, and to reemphasize necessity for speedy conclusion of agreement.
764
Sept. 26 (39) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Stucki’s approval of speeding up negotiations, but his rejection of U. S. suggestion that Swiss requests for additional concessions be withdrawn.
764
Oct. 11 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Résumé of a meeting with the Swiss negotiators for discussion of the smuggling question; outline of proposal under study by both sides for settlement of the major point at issue.
765
Oct. 22 Memorandum by Mr. H. M. Catudal of the Division of Trade Agreements
Conversation with Swiss negotiators, who accepted U. S. draft proposal for settling the smuggling problem conditioned upon U. S. guarantee of non-enactment of the McCormack Bill; U. S. rejection of the Swiss reservation in view of previous alternate understanding on this point.
766
Oct. 23 (66) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Résumé of status of negotiations now reaching closing stage; instructions to impress upon Stucki the importance to the United States of final requests going forward.
767
Oct. 24 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Swiss proposal and U. S. counterproposal (texts printed) designed to safeguard Swiss watch industry against discriminatory application of the McCormack Bill if enacted.
768
Oct. 25 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Alternate proposal on the smuggling question (text printed) to be submitted by the Swiss negotiators for Stucki’s approval.
769
Oct. 26 (43) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Request for Department’s comments in the light of information just received that Swiss watch industry would prefer no trade agreement to the draft as it now stands.
770
Oct. 26 (67) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Information that rephrased proposals together with added concessions have bettered American offers on watches.
770
1935 Oct. 28 (44) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Conversation with Stucki, who expressed pessimistic views on stalemate in negotiations, and urged U. S. reconsideration of the watch schedule.
770
Nov. 15 Memorandum by Mr. David Williamson of the Division of Western European Affairs
Conversation with Counselor Micheli of the Swiss Legation, who agreed that proposed visit of a Swiss textile expert was unnecessary.
771
Nov. 20 (77) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Instructions to ascertain from Stucki why no reply has been received with respect to U. S. final requests as described in telegram No. 66 of October 23.
772
Nov. 25 (48) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Stucki’s explanation of delay, and résumé of reply now en route.
772
Nov. 29 Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Conversation with the Swiss Minister, who pressed for additional concessions; Secretary’s promise to explore the matter, although little hope can be held for satisfactory results.
773
Dec. 16 Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Trade Agreements
President Roosevelt’s approval of a schedule on watches more advantageous to the Swiss than previous offer.
774
Dec. 26 (90) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Instructions to press for rephrasing of a paragraph in the proposed protocol relative to smuggling; advice that accord has been reached on all but minor points in the trade agreement.
774

Proposed Convention Between the United States and Switzerland Relative to Military Obligations of Certain Persons Having Dual Nationality

[Page LXX]
Date and number Subject Page
1931 Aug. 11 (1521) To the Minister in Switzerland
Background information, and instructions to approach the Swiss Government on the question of concluding a naturalization treaty; draft proposal (text printed) to be used as a basis for discussion.
775
1932 Apr. 18 (1853) To the Minister in Switzerland
Instructions to inquire as to Swiss position on the possibility of rephrasing certain portions of articles I and V of the draft proposal.
781
Sept. 8 (2708) From the Chargé in Switzerland
Presentation to Swiss authorities of the proposed naturalization treaty and desired changes thereto; advice that delay in Swiss response has been due to difference in point of view between the Political and Justice Departments.
783
1935 May 29 (3004) To the Minister in Switzerland
Request for statement on progress of convention to assist the Department in formulation of replies to inquiries of American citizens of Swiss origin concerning military taxes assessed against them by the Swiss Government.
784
June 22 (45) To the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Instructions to discuss with the Foreign Office the question of assessing military taxes against American citizens of Swiss origin, and to ascertain Swiss objections to U. S. proposals for a naturalization convention.
785
June 25 (28) From the Minister in Switzerland (tel.)
Foreign Office opinion that the Swiss Government is not empowered by its constitution to conclude a convention such as is envisaged; advice that counterdraft proposal is in preparation.
785
June 27 (3924) From the Chargé in Switzerland
Résumé of discussions with Swiss officials on the question of negotiating a convention; expectation of early decision in the matter.
785
Aug. 7 (4004) From the Chargé in Switzerland
Swiss counterdraft of convention (text printed), and explanatory note (text printed) indicating Swiss position.
786
1936 Feb. 19 (3399) To the Minister in Switzerland
Acceptance of the Swiss counterdraft, with certain modifications desired for the sake of securing uniformity in the treaties negotiated by the United States upon this subject.
(Footnote: Signature of convention on November 11, 1937.)
789

Disagreement Between the Governments of the United States and Switzerland as to Whether the Word “Citizens” in the Treaty of 1850 Included Corporations

Date and number Subject Page
1933 Oct. 21 (H.10/1) From the Swiss Minister
Request that an administrative decision be rendered to correct alleged contravention (by interpretation) of article II of the treaty of 1850 in respect to interests of Swiss corporations.
791
1934 Jan. 3 To the Swiss Minister
Résumé of argument to support U. S. opinion that the treaty provision cited has no application to corporations.
792
1935 Jan. 8 (H.10–1) From the Swiss Minister
Counterargument sustaining Swiss opinion and contending that the Department has abandoned its interpretation of former years.
795
Jan. 22 To the Swiss Minister
Acknowledgment of note of January 8, and willingness to give careful consideration to the views presented therein.
798
[Page LXXI]

SWITZERLAND

Enactment of Legislation by the United States To Prohibit the Commercial Use of the Coat of Arms of the Swiss Confederation

Date and number Subject Page
1935 Apr. 18 From the Swiss Legation
Friendly representations against the improper use of the Swiss Coat of Arms, and recommendation that the U. S. Government adopt the law necessary to fulfill its obligations under the Geneva Convention of July 27, 1929.
(Footnote: Information that such an act was approved June 20, 1936; 49 Stat. 1557.)
799