The Near East and Africa:
Contents
- Egypt: (Documents 622-629)
- Failure of the United States to conclude a treaty of extradition with
Egypt (Documents 622-624)
- Discrimination in favor of British firms in awarding contracts for the
building of irrigation works in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (Documents 625-627)
- Suspension of the Egyptian Government’s attempt to regulate automotive
traffic by decree10
(Documents 628-629)
- Failure of the United States to conclude a treaty of extradition with
Egypt (Documents 622-624)
- Ethiopia: (Documents 630-659)
- Cooperation by the United States in efforts to effect a reform of the
Special Court at Addis Ababa1
(Documents 630-636)
- Project for construction of a dam at Lake Tsana12
(Documents 637-659)
- Cooperation by the United States in efforts to effect a reform of the
Special Court at Addis Ababa1
(Documents 630-636)
- Liberia: (Documents 660-733)
- Morocco: (Documents 734-747)
- Saudi Arabia: (Documents 748-758)
- Syria: (Documents 759-763)
- For previous correspondence concerning Egyptian decrees regulating automotive traffic, see Foreign Relations, 1932, vol. ii, pp. 640 ff.↩
- Continued from Foreign Relations, 1932, vol. ii, pp. 659–671.↩
- Continued from Foreign Relations, 1928, vol. ii, pp. 786–799.↩
- For previous correspondence, see Foreign Relations, 1932, vol. ii, pp. 686 ff.↩
- The documents here printed indicate typical cases arising with respect to measures in the French Zone relating to the treaty rights of the United States. Representations during 1933 were also made with respect to regulations governing headlights of automobiles, sanitary measures regarding imported vegetable products, and a concession for the completion and operation of the Port of Saffi. For previous correspondence, see Foreign Relations, 1931, vol. ii, pp. 737 ff.↩
- In September of 1932 the name “The Kingdom of the Hedjaz and Nejd and Its Dependencies” was changed to “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. See Department of State, Press Releases, October 8 and 15, 1932, pp. 203 and 245.↩
- For previous correspondence concerning a proposed treaty, see Foreign Relations, 1931, vol. ii, pp. 547 ff.↩