500.A15 a 1/422: Telegram
The Chairman of the American Delegation (Gibson) to the Secretary of State
[Received 5:22 p.m.]
86. Houghton’s telegram No. 162, July 12, noon. See my telegram No. 87 to follow. Chamberlain’s first proposal, as we understand it, is precisely what we have consistently urged, to wit, the fixing for a period concurrent with the life of the Washington treaty of a total tonnage for each class, reserving to each of the signatories the right to construct in accordance with its requirements. Chamberlain may, however, have intended to suggest a limitation as to types of cruisers which would have the result of forcing upon us certain kinds of vessels unsuited to our needs.
With respect to the four assertions made by Sir Austen, I desire to make the following observations:
- 1.
- It is perfectly well understood by the British delegation that because of the requirements for extensive cruising radius and the greatest protection obtainable in conjunction therewith, the largest sizes of cruisers are of the most value to us.
- 2.
- There can be no advantage in discussing the matter of restricting the number of cruisers of maximum size until the British shall have [Page 104] consented to a total figure for the whole cruiser category. Although the matter has been kept open for subsequent discussion, we cannot of course in the absence of definite assurance of an embracing and real limitation, make any commitment on this matter.
- 3.
- An adjournment of the Conference or the recall of Bridgeman would not appear to be advisable in the event of Bridgeman’s being instructed to arrive at an accord on a sensible tonnage figure by classes. Whether a common meeting ground can be found for the Japanese and the British is the real and relatively simple point at issue. We ourselves occupy an advantageous middle ground. The delegates appear to be in a better frame of mind and the moment to urge a decision seems opportune. While we should naturally not withhold consent to, we do not recommend compliance [sic] with a British request for adjournment, should such be made.
- 4.
- It is too early to venture an opinion concerning the advisability of your meeting Chamberlain in Geneva until we know whether any concessions will be consented to at this time by the British. Unless unforeseen eventualities occur, we are of the opinion that your influence can be of greatest value in Washington where it has to date been extremely efficacious.
Copy sent to London.