890d.01/164

The Ambassador in France (Herrick) to the Secretary of State

No. 3645

Sir: In accordance with your telegram No. 391, of October 23, 1923, 3 p.m., on October 24th the Embassy informed the French Foreign Office in writing that the United States Government was prepared to resume negotiations for the conclusion of a convention relative to the Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon.

I am now in receipt of a reply from the Foreign Office dated November 2, 1923, copy and translation of which are enclosed. In this note the Department will observe that the French Government communicates the substance of its assurances to the Italian Government.

I learned from a private source that the only reason why the texts of the notes exchanged between the Foreign Office and the Italian Ambassador in Paris were not communicated to us, is because mention is made therein of the Tripartite agreement.5 The mention of the Tripartite agreement is made in the last sentence of Paragraph 3 of Mr. Poincaré’s note to this Embassy. The clause in question was read to me and it would in substance be the same if the phrase “under the Tripartite agreement” was substituted for the words “in the settlement of the peace in the Orient”.

I likewise enclose herewith the text in English and French of the Convention as agreed upon in July 1922,6 with the slight modifications rendered necessary by the fact that the Mandate is now in force. If this text is satisfactory to the Department, full powers can be telegraphed me and the Convention signed.

I have [etc.]

Myron T. Herrick
[Enclosure—Translation7]

The French Minister for Foreign Affairs (Poincaré) to the American Ambassador (Herrick)

Mr. Ambassador: In a letter dated October 24th last, the Chargé d’Affaires of the United States was good enough to inform me that the Federal Government was disposed to continue negotiations with the French Government for the signature of a convention relative to the French mandate for Syria and the Lebanon. In fact an agreement [Page 5] was reached on July 13, 1922, on a draft convention the signature of which was deferred until such time as a peace treaty should be signed between the Allied Powers and Turkey and the mandate for Syria and the Lebanon should come into force. The signature of peace with Turkey on July 24, 1923,7a and the coming into force of a mandate, the terms of which were approved by the Federal Government in 1922, now permit the conclusion of the convention prepared between the United States and France.

On the other hand, the Federal Government has expressed the desire to take into account, in this convention, if necessary, any agreements which may have been reached since 1922 between the French Government and other Governments regarding Syria.

I have the honor to inform Your Excellency that the French Government has limited itself in this respect to giving the Italian Government the assurances which the latter has requested in regard to the interests with which it is charged. The French Government has stated that it would consider favorably the establishment between Syria, on the one hand, and the Island of Rhodes and other territories over which Italy has rights in the Eastern Mediterranean, on the other, of a system of coastwise shipping, similar to that which through proximity may grow up between Syria and Palestine. It has also confirmed, in conformity moreover with the principles of the mandate, that the advantages obtained by Italy in the settlement of peace in the Orient did not deprive her of the benefit of the economic equality ensured in Syria to all members of the League of Nations.

Consequently, the following explanations have been furnished the Italian Government:

“Within the limit of its powers and its obligations as a mandatory power, the French Government will apply itself to prevent any provision of the legislation of Syria and the Lebanon from aiming to impose upon aliens in Syria or the Lebanon a change of nationality, with the exception of any change resulting from marriage.

The object of article XI of the mandate for Syria is not to exclude the participation of Italian enterprise in the public works and services, and works of public utility, nor in the development of the natural resources of the country when the administration does not proceed with them directly itself. In case of such participation, the French Government would be disposed to consider favorably the conclusion of an agreement with the Royal Government to regulate the conditions of Italian labor which would as a consequence be admitted into Syria.

The French Government gives the Italian Government the assurance that the definitive judicial organization in Syria and the Lebanon [Page 6] will provide that the tribunals to which aliens will be subject will be composed of a majority of French judges, except in the case of suits of little importance, against the judgments in which, however, appeal may be brought before courts which have a majority of French judges.

The French Government gives to the Italian Government the assurance that the object of article X of the mandate for Syria and the Lebanon will not be to prevent the opening of new Italian schools or to limit the right of these schools to receive pupils from other communities. The supervision of the mandate will be limited strictly to what is required by public order and good administration. It adds that there is no intention of authorizing any arbitrary intervention in the internal affairs of any faith.

The French Government assures the Royal Government that Italian schools, orphanages, asylums, hospitals, and dispensaries will enjoy in Syria and the Lebanon free customs entry, with the exception of those institutions which carry on agricultural or industrial enterprises having a commercial character.

Goods amounting to a sum which is to be determined, imported for the personal use of the members of such institutions, will be admitted free of customs duty.

It is understood that the present advantages will only be granted in the measure that, and as long as, the conditions attached to them are strictly observed in letter and in spirit”.

The foregoing assurances being in conformity with the provisions of the mandate and their benefit being assured to the United States of America as to all the members of the League of Nations by article 2 of the draft Franco-American convention, and by article 11 of the mandate, I am pleased to believe, Mr. Ambassador, that the Federal Government will deem it possible to proceed shortly with the negotiations for the conclusion of a convention, the terms of which I am happy to have established with Your Excellency.

Kindly accept [etc.]

Poincaré

  1. Agreement, between Great Britain, France, and Italy, signed at Sèvres, Aug. 10, 1920, relating to spheres of special interests in Anatolia; British and Foreign State Papers, 1920, vol. cxiii, p. 797.
  2. See Foreign Relations, 1922, vol. ii, p. 131.
  3. File translation revised.
  4. Great Britain, Cmd. 1929, Treaty Series No. 16 (1923): Treaty of Peace with Turkey, and Other Instruments, Signed at Lausanne on July 24, 1923, etc.