891.01A/23

The Ambassador in Great Britain (Harvey) to the Secretary of State

No. 436

Sir: With reference to my telegram to the Department No. 699 of August 23, 10 a.m.,2 concerning Persian affairs, and as supplementary to my despatch No. 410 of August 26th last,2 I have the honor herewith to transmit a memorandum of a further conversation between the newly appointed Persian Minister to the United States and Mr. Post Wheeler.

I attach also two telegrams from Teheran, published in today’s Times.2

I have [etc.]

For the Ambassador:
Post Wheeler

Counselor of Embassy
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the Counselor of the Embassy in Great Britain (Wheeler)

This morning His Excellency, Mirza Hussein Khan Alaï, Persian Minister in Madrid, called upon me again with reference to his conversation of July 18th.

He stated that he had just received news of the confirmation of his appointment as Persian Minister at Washington and that he expects to sail on the S.S. Berengaria on August 6th next.

[Page 636]

He said that he had received further telegrams from his Government with reference to the matters he had talked of with me during his previous call. These somewhat modified or amplified the Persian Government’s plan as then outlined.

He put particular stress in the conversation that followed upon Persia’s desire to maintain the very friendliest relations with Great Britain, and upon her lack of any idea of entangling the United States in Persia’s affairs to her disadvantage. The Anglo-Persian Agreement, signed in August 1919, with the proviso (according to the Persian Constitution) that it must be submitted for ratification to the Persian Parliament, had awakened suspicion in France, and more especially in Russia, and in fact in the United States itself. The Persian Parliament had refused even to consider it, and finally, when the British Government was pressing for its execution and had already begun to send experts to Persia, had, in agreement with Great Britain, declared it to be null and void. Great Britain, he said, saw very clearly the situation.

Another reason for Persia’s feeling against British advisors was the rivalry of Russia, which at the present moment existed in Persia. After the Russian revolution the succeeding Governments in Russia had declared the old Russo-Persian Agreement of 1907 to be abrogated and recently the Soviet Government had assured Persia of her desire to arrive at arrangements which would not infringe upon Persia’s liberty or independence. She had also written off Persia’s debt to her and had given back to Persia’s keeping the concessions which had been transferred to Russians covering roads, oils, mining, etc. Russia is at present very jealous of Great Britain in Persia and would consider the presence of British experts as a threat to herself.

Persia, threatened and even invaded in the North, has been forced to arrive at some modus vivendi with Russia and self-protection requires that she take into account this Russian jealousy of Great Britain. She desires to see no other Power assuming a preponderance in Persia and the only alternative which suggests itself to the Persian Government is to have the friendly cooperation of the Government of the United States, which Power is disinterested and possesses the entire confidence of the Persian people and Parliament. It was thought also by the Persian Government that the present friendliness of Great Britain’s feelings towards the United States would make impossible any irritation over the appointment of American experts in Persia.

His Excellency then touched upon the question of the loan of which he spoke last week. His Government he said had concluded that Persia’s need was for a substantial sum of (say) one hundred million dollars. This would be used mainly to start works of reproduction. [Page 637] In order to establish a financial equilibrium, the Government’s intention was to use a portion of this sum, (something under three million pounds) for the payment of the old national debt to Great Britain. Three quarters of the whole would be devoted purely to productive works. The Persian Government would guarantee this loan, not only by the income from the Northern oil, but also by the income from the tobacco monopoly (£200,000) and from Customs (£900,000.—this’sum being at present greatly under par). Altogether there would be available an annual sum of seven and one half million dollars to guarantee the loan.

The United States would have, also, further guarantees of moral character; the financial advisor would be an American. Some guarantee lay in the fact that the Persian Government was now engaging Swedish officers to reorganize thoroughly the country’s military forces and its gendarmerie.

The loan, he added, could be supplied in portions as needed, spread over a term of years.

He next spoke of the National Bank which Persia desired to establish. This was formerly the Russian Bank, instituted by the Russian Imperial Government, which had been returned to Persia by the Soviet Government. They were particularly desirous that this Bank should be managed by an American expert. While this Bank would sell shares, in the syndicates which would exploit the concessions, to Persian and foreign capital, the Persian Government itself intended to participate and to devote a certain sum under the loan to the use of the Bank, as capital for the purchase of shares in these syndicates.

In closing, His Excellency stated that owing to financial stress the keen desire of his Government was to obtain an early advance of say five million dollars on the larger loan projected—an advance which might be guaranteed by the proceeds of the Southern Oil.

He again expressed his hope that the Ambassador would be able to see him and give him some counsel—which was all the more desired by him now that he was to take up the position of Persian Minister to the United States.

Post Wheeler
  1. Not printed.
  2. Not printed.
  3. Not printed.