818.00/627

Senator George H. Moses to the Acting Secretary of State

My Dear Mr. Polk: I am enclosing with this a letter today received by me from the attorney for the Costa Rican Government.

The subject matter is self-explanatory; and I will be glad to have any comment upon it which you choose to make.

Sincerely yours,

Geo. H. Moses
[Enclosure]

The Attorney for Costa Rica (Hazelton) to Senator George H. Moses

My Dear Senator: Inasmuch as our Department of State declines official intercommunication with the duly accredited agency of the Costa Rican Government here in Washington, I am induced to invoke your kindly offices to transmit to that Department this letter or its subject matter over your signature as a matter of justice to the Government of Costa Rica.

I am instructed by that Government as its legal representative here, to say that the report that is understood to have been made to the Department of State by the American Consul, Mr. Chase, at San [Page 822] Jose, that he had been informed by a member of the Senate of Costa Rica in the presence of a gathering of responsible men that the lives of the American colony would be sacrificed by the action of that Government should the pending invasion of the Territory of Costa Rica from Nicaragua succeed, is without any foundation in truth whatever.

It is hardly necessary to say that this alleged report on the part of the American Consul is preposterous upon its face and unworthy of belief, as the fact was well known to him that the American colony in Costa Rica with all its vast interests in property and life, has always been and is now in close alliance with that Government for the mutual protection whether in offensive or defensive warfare, of their mutual interests. Nevertheless, the Government of Costa Rica deems it a wise precaution to bring to the knowledge of the Department of State their emphatic denial of the truth of this statement, as set forth in a Joint Resolution passed by the Congress of Costa Rica, which in part reads as follows:

“No Senator nor Costa Rican having any moral integrity would make such a statement to the American Consul and it should be evident to the American Consul that this malicious slander could not be true against the traditions of this hospitable country that has always complied with the obligations as a civilized nation extending every courtesy to all foreigners; the outrageous slander is considered by this Joint Session as an insult to the country and therefore the Congress unanimously resolves to protest in the most emphatic manner the displeasure against this slander and resolves that its members sign this protest as approval of same.”

Sincerely yours,

Geo. C. Hazelton