893.51/2206

The Minister in China (Reinsch) to the Acting Secretary of State

No. 2660

Sir: In connection with my despatch No. 2626 of March 21st89 relating to a protest against the 8th Year Internal Loan, I have the honor to forward copies of the identic note directed to the Foreign Office by the Ministers representing Consortium Powers.

I have [etc.]

Paul S. Reinsch
[Enclosure]

Identic Note from the British, French, Japanese, and Russian Ministers to the Chinese Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs

Sir: The Government Gazette of February 23rd. contained a Presidential Mandate promulgating regulations for the issue of 8th Year Internal Loan Bonds, and Article 5 of these Regulations provides [Page 506] that Salt Surplus Funds shall constitute the security for the repayment of principle and payment of interest on the loan.

I have since been approached by … Bank, one of the signatories to the Reorganization Loan Agreement of 1913,92 which desires me to protest against the designation of these funds as security for this loan, on the ground that such a step infringes the terms of that Agreement and is prejudicial to their interests. The Bank’s complaint appears to me a justifiable one, and for the following reasons.

Article 17 of the Reorganization Loan Agreement provides that:

“In the event of the Chinese Government desiring to issue further loans secured upon the revenues of the Salt Administration or to issue supplementary loans for purposes of the nature of those specified in Article 2 of this Agreement, the Chinese Government will give to the Banks the option of undertaking such loans”, etc.

In the present case the surplus revenues of the Salt Administration have been designated as security for the loan with the result that the stipulations of the Article above quoted are thereby infringed and the value of the Salt revenue as a future security impaired.

Furthermore, the Government Gazette of March 8th published a letter from the Ministry of Finance to the Inspector-General of Customs in which the undertaking was given that the proceeds of any future loan secured upon the Salt Revenue shall be charged with a half year’s installment of the service, of the present internal loan. I am compelled to take exception to any such provision, which introduces a new condition into the terms of Article 17 above quoted.

In view of the above it becomes my duty to protest against the steps recently taken by Your Excellency’s Government in connection with the 8th Year Internal Loan, and to request their immediate cancellation, in order to conform to the terms of the Reorganization Loan Agreement of 1913.

Trusting to receive an early reply, I avail myself [etc.]