File No. 861.77/565

The Ambassador in Japan ( Morris ) to the Secretary of State

[Telegram]

Replying to your November 30, 7 p.m. It would seem to me extremely unwise under present circumstances to modify our position that the Chinese Eastern should be considered as a portion of the main line of Trans-Siberian Railway system. If we confine ourselves to the use of the Amur Railway, as suggested by the Consulate at Vladivostok, we would practically admit Japan’s claim of succession to Russia’s rights in the Chinese Eastern. The plan agreed to by Japan, as reported in my December 2, 10 p.m.,1 providing for Allied supervision with Stevens as executive chief to assist in operation of the entire system, is far better.

Replying to your November 23, 2 p.m. The plan now suggested by Japan does not specify any definite time of Allied supervision and assistance. I think public statement should be issued by Allied committee when organized, explaining its purpose and stating definitely that it will continue only so long as the Russian management requires assistance. Stevens believes that in a reasonable time good working Russian organization can be built up.

Morris
  1. Not printed.