763.72/3261½

President Wilson to the Secretary of State

My Dear Mr. Secretary: The Swiss Minister is pressing for a reply to the suggestion of his government.18 He is a very diligent and pressing gentleman!

What would you think of replying to him in the sense of the enclosed memorandum?

I have tried my hand at a restatement of the bases. What do you think of the result? All that we can hope for is to agree upon definite things and rely on experience and subsequent exchanges of treaty agreement to develop and remove the practical difficulties.

Faithfully Yours,

W. W.
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by President Wilson

Bases of Peace

I

Mutual guarantee of political independence,—absolute in all domestic matters, limited in external affairs only by the equal rights of other nations.

[Page 23]

II

Mutual guarantee of territorial integrity.

Note. The application of this guarantee to the territorial arrangements made by the terms of the peace by which the present war is to be ended would, of course, necessarily depend upon the character of those arrangements, that is, upon their reasonableness and natural prospect of permanency; and, so far as the participation of the United States in the guarantee is concerned, would depend upon whether they were in conformity with the general principles of right and comity which the President set forth in his address to the Senate on the twenty-second of January.

Such a guarantee would not affect natural expansion peaceably accomplished.

III

Mutual agreement not to take part in any joint economic action by two or more nations which would in effect constitute an effort to throttle the industrial life of any nation or shut it off from fair and equal opportunities of trade with the nations thus in concert or with the rest of the world.

Note. This would of course not apply, as its terms indicate, to the laws of an individual state intended for the regulation and development of its own industries or for the safeguarding of its own resources from misuse or exhaustion, but only to cooperative action between states intended or which would operate to injure particular rivals or groups of rivals.

IV

Mutual agreement to limit armaments, whether on land or sea, to the necessities of internal order (including, of course, the internal order of an empire) and the probable demands of cooperation in making good the foregoing guarantees and agreements.

Note. Provided the nations which take part in these covenants may reasonably be regarded as representing the major force of mankind.

General Note. It is suggested that it would not be necessary to set up at the outset any permanent tribunal or administrative agency, but only an office of correspondence through which all matters of information could be cleared up, correspondence translated by competent scholars, and mutual explanations and suggestions exchanged. It would in all likelihood be best, in this matter of executive organization, to await the developments and lessons of experience before attempting to set up any common instrumentality of international action.

[Page 24]

Points To Be Made in Reply to the Suggestion of the Swiss Federal Council

The probable physical impossibility of holding an actual conference.

The embarrassments which it is now evident many neutral governments would feel in seeming to come together to influence the present course of events.

The desirability, nevertheless, of a frank interchange of views.

Suggestion, therefore, that the Swiss Federal Council communicate to the Government of the United States its views as to any present feasible course of cooperative action and any common bases upon which neutrals might at this time draw together in a League of Peace. The United States would be very glad in its turn, or at the invitation of the Council, to submit its own views on these vital and important subjects.