File No. 907/33–34.

Minister Wilson to the Secretary of State.

No. 251.]

Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the department’s No. 131, inclosing for my information a copy of a letter from the honorable Secretary of Commerce and Labor, which contains the [Page 75] decision of the honorable Attorney-General of the United States in the case of the Cuban immigrant, Geronimo Garcia, defining the interpretation of the immigration laws of the United States as the same relate to the question of assisted immigration in its various phases.

I have communicated the substance of the decision of Mr. Bonaparte to the Belgian foreign office in a note, copy of which is inclosed.

I have, etc.,

Henry Lane Wilson.
[Inclosure.]

Minister Wilson to the Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Mr. Minister: Referring to your excellency’s note of the 3d of May, 1907 (Direction E, No. 1370), I beg to say that I am just in receipt of a dispatch from my Government, inclosing a copy of a decision rendered by the Attorney-General of the United States in the case of one Geronimo Garcia, a native of Cuba, who was induced to immigrate to the State of Louisiana by agents of the state board of agriculture, under promise of definite employment after arrival, his expenses thither being paid under agreement of reimbursement from his wages.

The Attorney-General, in summing up his conclusions, held that the promise of specific employment made in the case of Garcia was a clear violation of the labor-contract law, which excludes “persons hereinafter called ‘contract laborers,’ who have been induced or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or promise of employment, or in consequence of agreements, oral, written, or printed, expressed of implied, to perform labor in this country of any kind, skilled or unskilled.”

This provision, the Attorney-General holds, excludes “aliens solicited or induced to immigrate by reason of offers or promises, even when there is no contract of employment.

Your excellency will note that the inhibition here quoted is express and clear, but in order that the exact status of the present interpretation of the law may be clearly understood, it may not be superfluous to advise you that the decision of the Attorney-General in no way affects the rights of constituent States of the Union, through their accredited agents, to solicit immigration by advertisement, a right denied to corporations or individuals, and to pay the passage of immigrants, a right denied to corporations, societies, or municipalities. There is no bar to the expenditure by the State of any sum it chooses to appropriate for assisting immigration. A State may charter a steamship or steamship lines, and through its agents bring in aliens at its own expense. It can give land and cattle or property of any kind to immigrants brought in in this way, after their arrival. It is merely forbidden to bring in alien laborers under any prior promise of compensation or employment, or under any form of labor contract.

An alien induced to immigrate to the United States by the agents of any constituent State, and whose passage is paid, or who, after his or her arrival, is endowed with land or other property by the State, can not be deported under the contract-labor law. An alien induced to immigrate to the United States by the agents of any constituent State under promise of specific employment may be deported.

Your excellency is doubtless well advised of the existence of other provisions of the immigration laws of the United States relative to the deportation of undesirable immigrants, such as paupers, criminals, anarchists, persons afflicted with loathsome contagious or incurable diseases, and women brought for immoral purposes.

I avail myself, etc.,

Henry Lane Wilson.