Mr. Leishman to Mr. Hay.

No. 903.]

Sir: Referring further to my dispatch No. 889 of September 15, 1904, concerning the detail work necessary to conclude agreement with the Sublime Porte regarding American religious, charitable, and educational institutions in Turkey, I beg leave to inclose for the Department’s further information copy of note addressed by the legation to Mr. Peet, showing the large amount of detailed information that must first be obtained from the missionary societies.

I have, etc.,

John G. A. Leishman.
[Inclosure.]

Mr. Leishman to Mr. Peet.

Sir: Referring to the question of the legal standing of American charitable, religious, and educational institutions in Turkey, and more especially to the tenure of the landed properties owned by such institutions but registered in trust, in the names of private individuals, I beg to inform you that the legation thinks that the time has come when the matter of such tenure should be taken up and all such properties registered in the names of the institutions and the title deeds issued accordingly. This has been already done in the case of some American and other foreign institutions, but it is desirable to extend it by degrees to all the properties owned by our institutions in Turkey.

I shall therefore feel obliged if you will obtain for me all the data in regard to the landed properties owned’ in Turkey by the various American societies, to wit:

1.
Any and all title deeds covering the lands and all buildings and dependencies. You can keep these deeds at the Bible House until such time as the actual transfers take place, but hand in to the legation copies of the same at once.
2.
All deeds of trust signed by the individuals in whose names the properties are registered. You can keep the original deeds of trust in the Bible House, and, as in the case of title deeds, hand in to the legation copies of the same. In case the trustee is dead, inform whether he has heirs, who they are, and whether they are accessible.
3.
Copies of the registers of the municipalities or defeterhané authorities (tapou) if and wherever possible to obtain them.
4.
Maps of the premises showing the position of the buildings, and also what part of the ground or buildings is covered by what title deed.
5.
A full description of each building, giving the area, height, number of floors, number of halls, class rooms, etc.
6.
If there are any errors or changes in the title deeds concerning the boundaries or the kind of property, such as mulk, vacf, arazi-i-miriyé, etc., inform me of those also.
7.
In short, any further information as to when and how the properties [Page 833] were purchased or any information which missionaries or other trustees think would be necessary for me to have, such as, for instance, whether there has been any dispute over the properties; whether any actions have been brought by or against the owners on account of such tenure, and if yes, what the result has been, whether there are any pending actions, etc. Seeing the importance of the matter and the amounts spent on these properties, I have asked for full information to avoid, as far as possible, delays resulting from long correspondence between the central Ottoman authorities and the vilayets.

As soon as I begin to receive the replies to the above questions I shall take the necessary steps for application to the Sublime Porte, in view of a final settlement of this question.

I am, etc.,

John G. A. Leishman.