Mr. Leishman to Mr. Hay.

No. 370.]

Sir: I beg to inclose herewith copy of correspondence between Messrs. Post and Peet and the legation in regard to the general school question, also copy of note to the Porte accompanying list of schools.

It has been my endeavor from the beginning to secure, if possible, a definite acknowledgment of the principle of equal treatment rather than accept firmans for the schools already established, with merely implied or tacit acceptance on the part of the Ottoman Government of the principle.

* * * * * * *

Of course it would be much more satisfactory to have a clear and definite expression from the Ottoman Government acknowledging the principle in toto, and I am still using every effort to secure this, but it is always very difficult to get a clear and unqualified expression from the Ottoman Government on any subject, and should the Porte fail to comply and merely send a note similar to that sent in the English case, granting imperial recognition to the schools, hospitals, etc., already established, as per list furnished by the missionaries, which is supposed to cover each and every institution, I would not feel warranted [Page 748] in pressing my demand further for recognition of the question in principle without special instruction from the Department, for, while I have assumed that the Department would approve my endeavoring to secure more, I would not feel warranted in carrying this assumption to the extent that it would sanction my pressing a demand for more than what has been accorded to others.

Consequently I have only felt justified in assuring the representatives of the missionaries in Turkey, Messrs. Post and Peet, that all I could guarantee was that the Government would not accept less than what had been granted to similar institutions under the protection of other nations.

I have found it rather difficult at times to carry out the wishes of the Department and at the same time please the missionaries and keep on friendly terms with the Turks, but I am still in hopes of being able to secure an adjustment that will prove satisfactory to all parties.

With the hope that my line of action will continue to meet with your approval,

I have, etc.,

John G. A. Leishman.
[Inclosure 1.]

Mr. Leishman to the imperial ministry of foreign affairs.

Note verbal.]

In reply to the note verbale which the Sublime Porte has had the kindness to address, under date of February 24, the legation of the United States of America begs to advise the ministry of foreign affairs that, while it can not change from the position assumed in its note of February 6, it begs to inclose herewith as complete a list as it has in its possession of the American educational, charitable, and religious institutions established in the Ottoman Empire which would be covered by the settlement in principle that the Imperial Government recognizes and grants to any and all American educational, charitable, and religious institutions throughout the Ottoman Empire the same rights, privileges, and immunities that have or may be granted to similar institutions belonging to or under the protection of any other nation.

The legation is under the impression that the list inclosed is quite complete, with proper allowance for any error or omission, but if, alter the settlement of the principle involved, the Sublime Porte should desire any further detailed information, the legation will be most happy to place itself at the disposition of the ministry of foreign affairs, and in case of any omission in the said list the legation reserves the privilege to supplement and complete it later.

[Inclosure 2.]

Messrs. Post and Peet to Mr. Leishman.

Sir: We have your communication of the 25th instant, in which you say that you have filed at the Porte a list of American institutions in Turkey “in response to the further request evidenced in the note verbale of the ministry of foreign affairs of the 24th instant,” and in view also of the fact that you have ascertained that both the French and English embassies filed a list at the time of making their demand.

We also note that you continue to maintain your demand, “that we desire the matter settled in principle.”

The filing of the list has always been associated in our minds with the procuring of permits for individual institutions, a step subject to all the delays that the procuring [Page 749] of information from the various localities entails. If, therefore, our attention and that of the legation, so far as it is bestowed upon this case, is now directed to this feature, the greater and more important question will be likely to be obscured or wholly lost sight of. So great is our anxiety on this point, in view of our instructions from our committee in the United States, that we can not refrain from pointing out that the demand as embodied in your note to the Porte of September 26, 1902, in which the case was opened, and your subsequent note of February 6, 1903, in which the former demand is reiterated, makes no request for permits or concessions for individual institutions, but simply asks for the grant in general terms, like, for example, that accorded to France in November, 1901.

We have been assured by competent authority that all the then existing French institutions in Turkey were on a certain day in November, 1901, by a single Imperial edict, transformed from unauthorized institutions to those recognized as fully authorized and legally established. These same institutions were the day before wholly lacking in the eyes of the Government any form of authorization whatever.

To obtain a recognition and legalization at all commensurate with that which was then conferred is usually attended with great expense and vexatious delays covering years in duration. Regulations and laws, so called, are cited as requiring fulfillment, local bureaus and departments require to be consulted and satisfied, but in the case referred to we see all these requirements overridden and Imperial recognition granted, and a legal status admitted to all the institutions of a nation “en bloc” when at the time these same institutions we know were wholly lacking any form of local or governmental authorization whatever.

The test for admission into the category of institutions so recognized as legal by the highest authority in the Empire was simply that of existence at the moment as a French institution.

Whether or not the Porte was in possession of a complete list of the institutions on which His Majesty the Sultan was conferring a peculiar and unique rank, and from a governmental standpoint, a legal existence which hitherto had been unrecognized, it is certain that the grant refers to no detailed list of the individual institutions to which it applies, but comprehends all existing French institutions. And furthermore, the terms of the grant show that on its issuance the provincial authorities were notified to the effect that all French institutions had had their disabilities removed and were henceforth to be reckoned as legally established. The grant as it has been officially confirmed to us is in substance as follows:

“By a letter written in virtue of an Imperial Iradé mentioned in that letter, the Ottoman minister for foreign affairs declares that the Porte, after having acceded to our first demands accepts the new demands of France, viz:

  • “‘(1) Recognizes the legal status of our existing schools, and grants them the customs immunities stipulated in the treaties and conventions in force.
  • “‘(2) Recognizes the legal existence of our present charitable and religious establishments, and grants them exemption from the land tax, and the customs immunities stipulated in the treaties and conventions in force.
  • “‘(3) Authorizes the construction, repair, or enlargement of the scholastic, charitable, or religious establishments damaged or destroyed during the events of 1894, 1895, and 1896 in Asiatic Turkey and at Constantinople.
  • “‘(4) Undertakes to regard as fully and legally authorized the foundations, enlargements, constructions, and repairs we may desire in the future to effect, if, after being warned of our intention, the Imperial Government has not raised objections within the delay of six months.’

“Moreover, the documents proving that the decisions enumerated above are put into execution have been communicated to the French embassy in Constantinople.”

To obtain for the American institutions in the Turkish Empire a grant equal to that conferred by His Majesty upon the similar institutions of France in November, 1901, is to our minds the first step to be taken in this matter. We have, therefore, learned with satisfaction through your note to Doctor Post, February 20, that the council of ministry has passed favorably upon this matter, sending their decision to the Palace for Imperial sanction, and that you have asked for an audience of His Majesty.

Will it not be possible to hasten this and to make it, when obtained, the opportunity for asking that this feature of the case be satisfactorily completed? We have good reason for asserting our belief that our Government will extend to you in the endeavor to obtain this its powerful influence and help, and to secure this end we will continue to use what influence we can command through our friends at home.

Yours, faithfully,

  • George E. Post.
  • William W. Peet.
[Page 750]
[Inclosure 3.]

Mr. Leishman to Mr. Peet.

Sir: I am just in receipt of the joint letter of Mr. Post and yourself, dated March 3, in regard to the demand which has been made for the imperial recognition of American educational, charitable, and religious institutions in Turkey.

The suggestions contained in your letter (being practically a copy of the French demands) have already been incorporated in the demand submitted by the legation to the Sublime Porte, and although the list of American institutions prepared by Doctor Post and yourself was finally submitted to the Porte in accordance with established precedent, care was taken by the legation to protect as far as possible the settlement of the question in principle.

Every effort is being made to secure the realization of your utmost desires and also a prompt settlement, but possibly the Ottoman Government may set up the claim that the legation is asking for more than what has been conceded to the French and other embassies, in which event, should the claim prove to be well founded, the American Government may not consider itself warranted in supporting a demand for more than that has, been accorded to others.

One thing, however, you may rest assured of, and that is that the American Government will not accept less than what has been granted to similar institutions of other nations.

I am, etc.

John G. A. Leishman.