Mr. Bayard to Mr. Buck.

No. 68.]

Sir: I inclose with a reference to your No. 99a a copy of “Report No. 210” in the matter of the J. H. Hayball claim v. Peru, prepared by the Solicitor of the Department.

I am, etc.,

T. F. Bayard.
[Inclosure.]

Mr. Wharton, Solicitor, to the Secretary of State.

Report No. 210.]

Sir: I have examined the papers which are hereto annexed and I have no doubt that they present a case which will justify a grave demand for redress from the Government of Peru. The facts on which the claim is based may be briefly stated as follows:

On July 20, 1885, a force of 16 armed and uniformed men, of the party of General Cáceres, proceeded to Mr. Hay ball’s farm, some 33 miles from the coast, seized that gentleman, and demanded of him 20 horses, the same number of rifles, and a large amount of ammunition. He did not possess the rifles or ammunition, and refused to give up his horses, standing on his rights as an American citizen and consular agent at Chimbote. His animals, to the number of 80, were then seized, his store was pillaged, his orchard was laid waste, and he was forced to provide for his captors for the night. Of his animals, all but 28 were afterwards returned to him.

On the 4th of August following, 8 more horses were taken from him in a similar manner. On the next day, Mr. Hayball went to Chimbote to complain to the commander of the whole force. He was promised redress, but was made to pay the land tax for the current year, $144. The promise was not fulfilled. On the 15th of November last, Mr. Hayball was compelled to pay the land tax again to the representative of the other party. This time he was assessed $180. These repeated exactions and the seizure of his property have nearly ruined the claimant, and he asks that Peru should make good to him his losses.

He further states that during the ten years he has lived at Chimbote he has never had anything to do with the political questions of the country, or violated his neutrality as an American citizen.

I therefore respectfully report that our minister at Lima should be called upon to demand from the Government of Peru a suitable redress, both for the insult to this Government in the person of its consular agent and for the personal injuries to the claimant.

All of which is respectfully submitted.

Francis Wharton, Solicitor.
  1. Not printed.