Mr. Partridge to Mr. Gresham.

No. 36.]

Sir: I have the honor to send you, under separate cover, two copies of the message of the chief of the executive power transmitted to the national constituent assembly the 8th instant; and also three copies of the Annual Report of the Minister of Foreign Affairs for 1893. Matters of interest to the relations of Venezuela with the United States will be found in the latter, on pp. 27–31, inclusive, 43, 44, 48, and 49–51, inclusive. I inclose herewith translation of the minister’s remarks upon the subjects of reciprocity, the Hancox claim, and an extradition treaty.

I have, etc.,

Frank G. Partridge.
[Inclosure 1, No. 36.—Translation.]

[From the Report of Minister of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela for 1893.]

Customs reciprocity.

Very soon after the installation of the Venezuelan legation the Department of State expressed the desire to celebrate with this country a treaty of reciprocity upon bases more acceptable than those formerly proposed, excluding in them certain articles or products which before constituted one of the principal difficulties in arriving at the agreement which was requested.

The prolix negotiation to which, from 1890 to 1892, this matter gave rise, transcendental of itself by reason of the great interest which it involves, sufficiently proves the delicacy and care with which we ought to proceed before taking any [Page 725] step on the road to a treaty. Hence this ministry preferred to share the responsibility of the case with the officer of finance, where the new propositions were submitted to careful study, but without result so far favorable to the idea of a convention.

[Inclosure 2 in No. 36.—Translation.]

[From the Report of Minister of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela for 1893.]

Hancox claim.

The 19th of January, 1892, an agreement was signed by the plenipotentiaries of the two governments to submit to the decision of arbitration this old claim of the United States. Circumstances well known prevented the meeting of the Congress of that year, which ought to have given its approbation to the ratification and their respective exchanges.

The delay in their formality, in no matter dependent upon the executive power of Venezuela, has occasioned suggestion on the part of the Government at Washington in the sense of proceeding at once to the completion of the treaty or of seeking by some other means a way of repairing, to that end, the default of the legislative body. This ministry considering, as was natural, the precise precepts of our constitution, pointed out in its reply the impossibility in which the chief of the executive power found himself of arrogating to himself legislative faculties in diplomatic matters; and after some consideration regarding the convenience of recourse to arbitration, happily chosen for the definite solution of the Hancox claim, expressed the confidence which the Government of the Republic has that one of the first acts of the next constitutional congress will be to place in the way of immediate completion the treaty of the 19th of January, 1892.

[Inclosure 3 in No. 36.—Translation.]

[From the Report of Minister of Foreign Affairs of Venezuela for 1893.]

Extradition.

By means of its representative in Caracas the Government at Washington has just manifested the desire to celebrate with Venezuela a treaty of extradition.

The executive power disposed on its part to initiate formal treaties regarding such a matter has requested of the legation of the United States the basis upon which it was disposed to make an agreement, in order to study them in the light of judicial criticism which in that regard prevails among us, and to resolve beforehand the administrative or political difficulties which, on account of respective local laws, might embarrass from the start the course of the negotiation.