Mr. Blaine to Mr. Phelps.

No. 409.]

Sir: Referring to my instruction to you (No. 405) of the 18th instant, relative to the complaint of Messrs. Howson & Howson that patents issued to Americans in Germany are of doubtful validity, owing to the fact that there has not yet been published in the German Imperial Gazette the specific notification required as to the reciprocal rights granted by the United States to German inventors, I now inclose for your information a copy of a letter from the Secretary of the Interior [Page 187] from which it appears that the Commissioner of Patents is of the opinion that the German Government should be earnestly asked for the immediate publication in the German Imperial Gazette of the notification in question.

You are accordingly instructed to bring the subject to the attention of the foreign office with the request that the publication suggested by the Commissioner of Patents may be made with as little delay as possible.

I am, etc.,

James G. Blaine.
[Inclosure in No. 409.]

Mr. Chandler to Mr. Blaine.

Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 18th instant, transmitting copy of a letter from Messers. Howson & Howson of the 11th instant, stating “that patents issued to American inventors in German are of doubtful validity, owing to the fact that there has not as yet been published hi the German Imperial Official Gazette the specific notification required as to the reciprocal rights granted by the United Suites to German inventors.”

In reply I have the honor to inclose a copy of a letter addressed by Examiner Seely to the Commissioner of Patents and favorably indorsed by him. The Commissioner of Patents remarks that “the German Government should be earnestly asked for the immediate publication in the German Imperial Gazette of the specific not ideation referred to in the letter of the honorable Secretary of State.”

Very respectfully,

Geo. Chandler,
Acting Secretary.
[Inclosure in inclosure in No. 400.]

Mr. Seely to Mr. Simonds.

Sir: I have the honor to return herewith the letter of the 18th instant from the Secretary of State to the Secretary of the Interior, inclosing a copy of a letter from Messrs. Howson & Howson, of Philadelphia, regarding the conditions of the existing German law which renders invalid patents granted for inventions previously patented in this country, and to say that the conditions, as correctly stated by Messrs. Howson, are operating to the serious disadvantage of American patentees.

This is not by reason of any obscurity in the law, but is due apparently to careless reading of it, since it is expressly provided in the law that the exemption from having the right in Germany defeated by a prior printed publication is only to be claimed by citizens of states giving the same privilege to Germans, when that fact has been officially published in the Imperial Gazette. Many Americans have overlooked this last condition, and lawyers have even advised their clients that they might safely apply for patents in Germany after their domestic patents had been granted. I have always warned those with whom I have talked against this misapprehension, and have twice called attention to it through the press, but it still continues.

On March 19, 1891, in a letter to your predecessor I called attention to the new German law which was to go into force on October 1 following, and recommended that the subject be brought before the Secretary of State that steps might be taken as early as possible to have this official publication made on behalf of the United States for the benefit of American inventors. This letter, as I understood at the time, was duly transmitted to the Secretary of State, and I afterwards learned that the matter was brought to the attention of the United States minister at Berlin.

The only outcome hitherto so far as I know is in the proposition from Germany through her chargé d’affaires at this capital for a convention between the two Governments concerning patents and trade-marks. In the draft presented the three months’ limit is extended to six months, which would be for our decided advantage. [Page 188] The form of convention was, however, not entirely in consonance with our law, and some modifications were proposed on our side, concerning which the determination of Germany has not been heard so far as I am informed.

As the German Parliament was to adjourn at Easter, the proposed convention may have failed of adoption.

In this contingency, and pending the adoption of a convention of some kind, I would respectfully recommend that the German Government he solicited to place the United States on the list of governments whose citizens may reap the benefit of section 2 of its patent law, and of section 13 of the law of June 1, 1891, on the ground that this Government does by law afford corresponding privileges to German subjects.

I have, etc.,

F. A. Seely.