Mr. Egan to Mr.
Blaine.
Legation of
the United States,
Santiago, May 18, 1891.
(Received July 7.)
No. 164.]
Sir: I have the honor to refer to my numbers 157,
of April 27, and 160, of the 4th instant, in reference to the offer and
acceptance of the good offices of the United States, Brazil, and France for
the restoration of the internal peace of Chile, and now beg to report as
follows:
On receiving your authority, oh April 27, to act as mediator with the
Brazilian minister and French chargé d’affaires I at once placed myself in
accord with those gentlemen, and, as stated in my No. 160, our offer good
offices was very cordially accepted by the Government on the
[Page 124]
one side and by the committee of the
opposition or revolutionary party on the other.
In connection with an effort made by the ministers of Great Britain and
Germany to open negotiations, the admiral of the British squadron conveyed
from the leaders of the naval and military forces in the north plenary
powers to a committee of eight gentlemen in Santiago to act in behalf of the
opposition. Of the gentlemen thus named one, Mr. Alejandro Vial, had already
sailed for Europe. My colleagues and I secured from the Government a
safe-conduct for five others, Messieurs Melchior Concha i Toro, Eulojio
Altamirano, Carlos Walker Martinez, Gregorio Donoso, and Pedro Montt; Mr.
Belisario Prats did not need a safe-conduct, and Mr. Eduardo Matte acted
without one. I inclose a copy of the acceptance of good offices by the
Government and concession of safe-conduct, dated May 2 (inclosure No.
1).
The seven gentlemen composing the committee of the opposition met in
conference in this legation on Sunday the 3d instant, and by formal
document, a copy of which I inclose (inclosure 2), accepted the tendered
good offices of the United States, Brazil, and France.
After a number of conferences, from the 3d to the 5th instant, all of which
were held in this legation, the committee agreed upon and submitted to us
the bases upon which they would be willing to consent to an arrangement; but
they imposed the condition that we were not to communicate those bases to
the Government until we had first received from the Government, in writing,
a statement of its conditions. I inclose a copy of those bases, dated May 5
(inclosure 3).
Early in the day of the 6th the minister of Brazil, the chargé d’affaires of
France, and I went to the Moneda and found that the minister of foreign
relations, Mr. Bicardo Cruzat, was sick and not able to come to his office.
In his absence we were requested by His Excellency the President to confer
with the minister of interior, Mr. Domingo Godoy. Accordingly, we had a
conference with that gentleman, in the course of Which we were informed that
the Government, while prepared to listen to and consider in the most
benevolent manner any propositions that might come from the opposition
through us, should absolutely decline to submit any conditions before having
before it the opposition bases. In order to consult with the members of the
opposition committee, with a view to finding a way out of this difficulty,
we adjourned the interview to 5 o’clock same evening. On my colleagues and I
returning at that hour to the Moneda we found that list a few minutes
before, while Mr. Godoy, four others of the ministers, the president of the
Senate, and other gentlemen were returning to the Moneda from a meeting of
the Senate, two dynamite bombs had been thrown at them by two young men on
horseback, and that one of the bombs had exploded with terrific force a
short distance from the ministers, but fortunately without doing any
damage.
On entering the Moneda and meeting Mr. Godoy, we felicitated him upon his
fortunate escape and that of his colleagues, and at his invitation we
continued the negotiations of the morning. In consequence of what had just
taken place, Mr. Godoy was considerably exasperated against the opposition,
and, because we were not prepared to come directly to the point with regard
to the presentation of the opposition bases before receiving the conditions
of the Government, he declared the negotiations broken off, and, becoming
excited, he added that from that very moment the safe-conduct should be
considered canceled, and that we might not be surprised if some of the
parties were shot in the public square before morning, as he considered them
responsible
[Page 125]
for the attempt that
had been made against his life. We reminded him that the safe-conduct was a
solemn compact between his Government and those which we represented; that
one of its conditions was that we, the mediators, should fix the time when
it should cease to be in force; and we urged him to consider well the nature
of the responsibility which he was assuming, the more especially as the
gentlemen named in the safe-con duct were entirely above suspicion of even
the most remote knowledge, of the foul attempt at assassination which had
just occurred. As he continued obdurate, we requested to be allowed to
confer with the President; but Mr. Godoy refused, saying at the same time
that he spoke with full authority for the President and all of the
ministers.
We all three protested in clear and forcible terms, and left. We then took
immediate steps to place the delegates of the opposition in safety, and
within an hour we had conducted all of them within the legations.
At 7 o’clock the same evening the intendente or governor of the city called
upon my colleagues and upon me, and informed us in the name of the
Government that the delegates would be safe from arrest or surveillance
until 10 o’clock the next morning; to which I answered that nothing would
satisfy me short of full and complete compliance with the terms of the
safe-conduct. My colleagues returned similar replies.
On the 7th instant the minister of Brazil, the French chargé d’affaires, and
I were about to send identical telegrams to our respective Governments
setting forth the facts, and also to address identical letters of protest to
the Government, when by medium of Mr. Juan E. MacKenna, ex-minister of
foreign relations, and also by another gentleman, we received from the
President verbal messages to say that Mr. Godoy had spoken under excitement
consequent upon the attempt of which he had been the victim; that in what he
had said regarding the safe-conduct he had not expressed the sentiments of
the President or the ministry, and that the safe-conduct should continue in
full force until we should fix the time of its termination.
On the 8th instant the minister of foreign relations, in the name of the
President, addressed to us a note on the same subject, of which I inclose a
copy (inclosure 4). I also inclose copy of my reply thereto, dated May 12
(inclosure 5).
Finding it impossible, under the circumstances, to make further progress with
the negotiations for peace, we abandoned the attempt for the present, and
have addressed a joint note to the delegates of the opposition, of which I
inclose copy, dated May 10 (inclosure 6).
I also inclose a copy of a joint memorandum, dated May 12, addressed to the
minister for foreign relations, fixing the termination of the safe-conduct
(inclosure 7).
Of the seven gentlemen who composed the committee of delegates of the
opposition, six had, previous to the issue of the safe-conduct, been
concealed in Santiago and one, Mr. Prats, had been living here openly. The
Government having accorded to the five who were named in the safe-conduct
and to Mr. Prats permission to leave the country, I communicated with
Rear-Admiral McCann, who offered to take them on board the Baltimore to Oallao; but, before arrangements could be made for
leaving, the Baltimore received orders from the Navy
Department to sail on other duty. The generous offer of the admiral is,
however, very highly appreciated here. Subsequently only two of the number,
Mr. Pedro Montt and Mr. Eulojio Altamirano, elected to avail of the
permission to leave, and those gentlemen were escorted to Valparaiso by
[Page 126]
myself and colleagues and were
placed by us in safety on board the French corvette Volta on the 15th instant.
Apart from the momentary loss of temper on the part of Mr. Godoy, which,
under the circumstances, was not without some excuse, the action of the
Government, and especially that of the President, in regard to all matters
connected with this negotiation, and also towards the delegates of the
opposition, has been excellent.
I may add that the spirit displayed by the delegates of the opposition
throughout our intercourse has been most excellent, and that both sides
feel, as will be seen by the inclosed correspondence, deeply grateful to the
United States, Brazil, and France for the efforts that have been made to
reestablish internal peace in their country.
I shall carefully watch for and take advantage of any opportunity that may
offer to promote the restoration of peace, and I trust you will find that
under the circumstances detailed in this letter I have done all that was
possible in that direction, as also for the due maintenance of the honor and
dignity of my own Government.
I have, etc.,
[Inclosure 1 in No.
164.—Translation.]
Safe-conduct for the delegates of the
opposition.
The honorable ministers of the United States, of Brazil, and of France,
duly authorized by their respective Governments and acting conjointly,
have conveyed to the Government of Chile their desire to exercise their
good offices between the Government and the parties of the opposition
for the reëstablishment of the public peace.
The Government having accepted for its part those good offices, the said
honorable ministers have solicited adequate guaranties for the persons
of the parties of the opposition with whom they must communicate.
Consequently, the minister of foreign relations, in the name of the
Government, concedes personal guaranty to the extent that the following
gentlemen can not be arrested, imprisoned, nor molested in any manner
whatsoever, viz, Mr. Melchior Concha i Toro, Mr. Carlos Walker Martinez,
Mr. Eulojio Altamirano, and Mr. Pedro Montt, with the object that they
may be able to hold the necessary conferences with the diplomatic
ministers above named.
In case the said conferences do not produce favorable results, the
present guaranty will continue for such time as the said honorable
diplomatic ministers may designate. This guaranty will be used by the
persons to whom it is conceded with the prudence necessary in order to
preserve the due secrecy of the conferences and in order not to call
public attention to themselves.
This document will remain deposited with the honorable minister
representing the United States.
Done in Santiago
the 2d of May,
1891.
Ricardo Cruzat.
This guaranty is extended to Mr. Gregorio Donoso upon the same terms
as those above mentioned.
Santiago, May 2,
1891.
Ricardo Cruzat.
[Inclosure 2 in No.
164.—Translation.]
Acceptance of good offices by the delegates of the
opposition.
The undersigned, meeting in the legation of the United States of America,
in Santiago, the 3d of May, 1891, in virtue of having accepted the
generous offer which, with the object of intervening as mediators for
the purpose of putting an end to the civil war which afflicts the
Republic of Chile, the honorable minister plenipotentiary of the United
States and the honorable representatives of Brazil and France
[Page 127]
have been good enough to make,
we deem it our duty, in this our first meeting, to place on record the
following facts:
I. The Hon. Jorge Montt, chief of the constitutional forces by sea and
land, in the name of the provisional government established in the
northern provinces, for himself and as representative of his colleagues,
has communicated to us, by note of April 20 ultimo, that he received a
dispatch from the honorable Rear-Admiral Hotham, commander of the naval
forces of Her Britannic Majesty in the Pacific, in which, complying with
the instructions of Hon. Mr. Kennedy, minister resident of Her Britannic
Majesty, he placed in his hands a notification that the said honorable
minister in his own name and in that of the honorable minister of
Germany of their own initiation, offered their good offices for the
purpose of entering into negotiations and to propose some modus operandi with the object of saving Chile
from more bloodshed and more ruin.
That for his part Hon. Mr. Montt, charged with the defense of the rights
of Parliament and of the constitutional system, believed he would have
failed in his duty if he had not gladly accepted the negotiations; that
he consequently accepted the generous initiative of the honorable
ministers of Germany and England providing that the representatives of
the opposition should be named from the persons who constitute a list
communicated by him. Said list contains the names of the undersigned and
of Mr. Alejandro Vial, who is absent from the country.
II. Hon. Mr. Kennedy, English minister, has been good enough to convey
said communication, which has been brought to our knowledge.
III. The honorable ministers of the United States, Brazil, and France,
prior to the date on which Hon. Mr. Kennedy placed in our hands the note
of the council of the provisional government, had offered to the
Government of Mr. Balmaceda and to some of the undersigned the good
offices of their respective Governments.
IV. For the undersigned it would have been very satisfactory to accept
the mediation of the honorable ministers of Germany and England had it
not been for the fact that the good offices of the honorable ministers
of the United States, Brazil, and France had been previously offered and
already accepted by Mr. Balmaceda.
V. The subscribers, authorized to represent the council of the government
of the north and the chief of the constitutional forces in negotiations,
tending to reestablish peace and rule of the constitution and of the
laws of the Republic, with ample power, consider themselves invested
with sufficient power to accept, as we do accept, the mediation of the
honorable representatives of the United States and of the Republics of
Brazil and France.
For the purposes of what may transpire, we have agreed to place all of
the foregoing in the knowledge of the honorable ministers who have
honored us with the manifestations of their sentiments of interest and
sympathy, and to place this document on record in the archives of this
legation, begging the honorable minister plenipotentiary of the United
States to be good enough to give it place therein.
- B. Prats.
- M. Concha i Toro.
- E. Altamirano.
- Pedro Montt.
- Gregorio Donoso.
- Eduardo Matte.
- Carlos Walker Martinez.
[Inclosure 3 in No.
164.—Translation.]
Bases of peace submitted to mediators by the
delegates of the opposition.
[Confidential.]
Messrs. Ministers: The mediation which your
honors offered with the noble and elevated purpose of saving our country
from the sacrifices which war imposes, even when conducted by both sides
with the nobleness and generosity which should always govern contests
between brothers, having been accepted by us, as indicated in our
communication of yesterday, the moment has arrived to indicate to your
excellencies the way which, in our judgment, may conduct to a peaceful
solution without detriment to the high interests which the confidence of
our compatriots has charged us to represent, and whose defense is for us
a patriotic and unavoidable duty.
After the blood that has been spilled, after the sacrifices and horrible
vexations endured with fortitude by our fellow-citizens in those moments
of tribulation and shame for the country, we, Messieurs Ministers, do
not change the formula of our former ciaims, and demanding to-day the
same that we claimed yesterday, we believe, gives evident testimony of
supreme moderation.
In the name of our compatriots we offer to lay down arms if there be
reëstablished in all its vigor the supremacy of the constitution and the
laws of the Republic,
[Page 128]
with the
declaration and recognition of the nullity of all the acts executed in
open violation of their provisions; the constitutional and legal
situation to be reinstated from December 31 last, with the result of
removing from our records the decrees in which have been exceeded the
faculties given according to our laws to the executive power.
Consequently, and simply as an example in order to clearly express our
idea, we say that the decree which ordered the holding of elections of
senators, of deputies, and of municipal representatives in the mouth of
March last, being completely and absolutely unconstitutional, the
citizens who derive their titles from those elections, vitiated by
inexcusable want of efficacy, can not be recognized as legitimate
representatives of the people.
Still further as an example, we recall that the tribunals of justice
should practice at once, with all the amplitude of jurisdiction which
our laws accord them, and that there should be canceled the numerous
decrees of dismissal of public employés who were protected by
constitutional and legal guaranties which have not been respected.
The legitimate Congress, whose powers continue in force, should be
convocated with all dispatch, in order to provide all that may be
necessary with respect to future elections, the public funds, the
maintenance of the army and of the navy, and, in general, the
constitutional and legal order of the Republic.
In a word, we demand that which is a perfect right, and for every citizen
an undoubted debt, that is, that there be reëstablished the supremacy of
the constitution and of the laws, abolishing all the powers or
authorities that in months past of the present year have been dictated
contrary to their prescriptions.
In the second place, we demand efficacious guaranties that will assure
the complete and loyal execution of the requests we have advanced.
Now, Messieurs Ministers, mediators, you know our ideas, and we
confidently hope that the supreme moderation and undeniable justice in
which they have been inspired may be appreciated at their value.
Our demands would not be regarded as excessive in any civilized country.
If they should be accepted, the mediation of the representatives of the
three Republics would have produced a result a thousand times blessed in
assuring and consolidating among us respect for the law, that
indispensable base of popular government.
If it should be rejected, armed resistance will be more and more
justified, not only before our own conscience and before our patriotism,
but before the opinion of the civilized world.
The honorable ministers will observe that we abstain from indicating what
should be, in our judgment, the guaranties of loyal execution that the
agreement should contain, and we hasten to give the reason of our
proceeding.
We seek brevity, and the discussion between us of the points regarding
our second requirement would be useless if the first should not be
accepted.
We hope, then, that the honorable ministers, mediators, when they can do
so, will have the goodness to inform us if the Government of Santiago
accepts or not the idea of submitting itself to the constitution and to
the laws of the Republic.
In the first place, we will hasten to indicate the means that, in our
belief, would bring back to our country confidence in her future and the
quietude it has lost.
Expressing again to the honorable ministers and to the Governments which
they so worthily represent the assurance of our gratitude.
We remain, your obedient servants,
- B. Prats.
- M. Concha i Toro.
- E. Altamirano.
- C. Walker Martinez.
- Gregorio Donoso.
- Eduardo Matte.
- Pedro Montt.
Santiago, May 5,
1891.
[Inclosure 4 in No.
164.—Translation.]
Señor Cruzat to the
mediators.
[In triplicate.]
Department of Foreign Relations,
Santiago, May 8,
1891.
To Messieurs Patrick Egan, envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary of
the United States;
H. B. Calvacanti de Lacerda, envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary of Brazil;
A. de France, chargé
d’affaires of France:
Messieurs Ministers: I have the honor to
address myself, in the name of His Excellency the President of the
Republic, to the ministers of the United States of America,
[Page 129]
of Brazil, and of France, for
the purpose of expressing to them the lively and sincere acknowledgments
of my Government for the good offices exercised in favor of the
re-establishment of peace and of the general quietude of the
Republic.
The solicitude with which the honorable ministers have discharged their
delicate task and their desire to procure a solution which would put an
end to the misfortunes produced by the civil strife provoked by the 7th
of January last binds once more the feelings of friendship which my
Government has always professed for the nations and the Governments
which your honors represent.
My Government has been disposed to hear propositions from the
revolutionary party which might permit it to deliberate in view of what
its duty and patriotism required in presence of proposals clearly
defined and manifested by the opposition groups in arms against the
constituted Government.
It is evident that the committee of direction of the revolution
considered that they could place in the knowledge of the honorable
ministers the bases upon which it was possible to put an end to the
pending conflict, but without empowering your honors to communicate them
to my Government only when in its name had also been formulated
conditions of settlement.
It was not possible to accept this proceeding, inasmuch as it involved a
recognition of the revolutionary attitude that would impair the
foundation of authority, for which His Excellency the President could
not, nor would not, refuse to make sacrifices, however painful they
might be to his sentiments and affections.
Events have marked out for His Excellency the President of the Republic
the only line of conduct compatible with his duties and the high
principles of preservation of public order entailed by the post which he
fills: to hear the propositions formulated by the party of the
opposition and to deliberate upon them with the spirit of equity and
patriotic discretion which corresponds to the chief of the Republic.
Not because the good offices of the honorable ministers may have been
unfruitful shall my Government remain unmindful of the noble and
elevated sentiments which individually and collectively have accompanied
their efforts.
I can not conclude without giving to the honorable ministers an
explanation especially recommended by His Excellency the President of
the Republic.
In the conference which took place the day before yesterday (Wednesday)
in the ministry of the interior at 5 o’clock in the evening there
occurred a misunderstanding with one of the honorable ministers with
respect to the duration of the personal safe-conduct conceded by the
Government through the medium of your honors to the persons who
constitute the revolutionary committee in Santiago.
The honorable minister of the interior arrived at his office and at the
conference referred to immediately after having been a victim of an
odious attempt which put in danger his life and those of his colleagues
the president of the Senate and other respectable senators who
accompanied them. Under the impression of that act the honorable
minister of interior believed that what had occurred could not fail to
attach to the directors of the revolution, and that in consequence had
ceased the guaranties conceded under the faith of the respect due to
persons even in a state of war and of internal struggle.
But the faith of the work pledged before your honors, and the
consideration which is due from this Government to your honors and to
your respective Governments, whatever may have been the violence of the
action perpetrated by individuals of the opposition, obliges us to
respect the guaranty conceded under date of the 2d instant until the
honorable ministers are pleased to fix the day on which same shall
cease.
With sentiments of highest esteem, etc.,
[Inclosure 5 in No. 164.]
Mr. Egan to Señor
Cruzat.
Legation of the United States,
Santiago, May 12,
1891.
Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of
the note which your excellency, in the name of His Excellency the
President of the Republic, has addressed to me on the 8th instant,
relating to the good offices of the United States of America, Brazil,
and France for the restoration of the peace of Chile.
The explanation which in the last part of said note your excellency has
given in relation to what occurred on the occasion of the interview
between my colleagues and I and the honorable minister of interior on
the 6th instant, at 5 o’clock p.m., makes it evident that that
gentleman, in declaring ineffective from that moment the
[Page 130]
safe-conduct granted to the delegates of
the opposition with whom we were to treat, acted without authorization
from the Government of Chile. We are therefore enabled to fix the time
at which the guaranty referred to shall cease, as in fact we did
yesterday.
For my part I accept with thanks the explanation, which is all the more
satisfactory because of its spontaneity.
Availing myself, etc.,
[Inclosure 6 in No.
164.—Translation.]
The mediators to the
delegates of the
opposition.
Messieurs Belisario Prats, Melchior
Concha i Toro, Eulojio Altamirano, Carlos Walker Martinez, Gregorio
Donoso, Eduardo Matte, and Pedro
Montt:
Gentlemen: We have the honor to acknowledge
receipt of the note which you have been good enough to address to us,
the 5th of this month, communicating the basis upon which you would be
disposed to enter into arrangements with the Government for the
reestablishment of the internal peace of Chile, under the good offices
which we have offered, and which have been accepted by both sides.
Before all, we may be permitted to convey to you our gratitude for the
good opinions which you have so cordially expressed with respect to our
Governments and their representatives.
With the impartiality imposed by our public character, and, besides, by
the august mission which we were called upon to fill towards the two
branches of the Chilean family, to-day unfortunately divided, we have
endeavored to open a road which would conduct to their union.
The names of all of the distinguished gentlemen who have signed the
letter of the 5th of May are of themselves sufficient guaranty of the
elevated and correct form of that political document, and which
impression we have entertained since it came to our cognizance. The
character with which we are invested, as you well comprehend, prohibits
us from pronouncing with respect to its substance.
You having intimated the desire that the Government should not receive
any knowledge of the basis of arrangement of the opposition unless they
should deliver to us their conditions in writing, we approached the
Moneda on 6th instant with this object.
Our efforts have been fruitless; the Government for its part gave us to
understand that it would not give us any knowledge of its conditions
unless we should previously communicate to it the basis of arrangement
of the opposition.
Before we were able to come to an understanding upon the manner of
arranging this question of form, the Government, alluding to an incident
entirely unconnected with this matter, which had occurred in the evening
of the same day, declared the negotiations broken off.
We deplore the want of success of the negotiations, and sincerely hope
that in the near future the Chilean nation may be able to follow again
the path of unalterable peace in search of those high destinies that
Providence has reserved for her
We have, etc.,
- Patrick Egan.
- H. B. Cavalcanti de
Lacerda.
- A. De France.
[Inclosure 7 in No.
164.—Translation.]
Termination of safe-conduct.
In virtue of the power conferred upon us in the safe-conduct conceded
under date of 2d of present month, the undersigned have the honor to
communicate to his excellency the Hon. R. Cruzat, minister of foreign
affairs of Chile, that they fix the day of the 15th of May instant, at
12 o’clock at night, as the time when said guaranty shall cease.
- Patrick Egan.
- H. B. Cavalcanti de
Lacerda.
- A. De France.