No. 25.
Mr. West to Earl Granville.

My Lord: I have the honor to transmit herewith to your lordship copy of a dispatch which I have received from Her Majesty’s consul at Baltimore, inclosing copies of an extract from the Baltimore American, containing a notice of the case of Denis H. O’Connor, now imprisoned in Ireland, and who is one of those mentioned in the resolutions introduced in the House of Representatives, on the subject of which I had the honor to address your lordship in my dispatch of the 15th instant.

I have, &c.,

L. S. SACKVILLE WEST.
[Inclosure 1 in No. 25.]

Consul Donohoe to Mr. West.

Sir: I noticed in a debate in Congress a few days ago on the subject of American citizens arrested in Ireland under the “coercion act” mention was made of a man named Denis O’Connor, belonging to Baltimore, and now in jail in Ireland. I was about making inquiries as to O’Connor when I saw the inclosed notice of his case in the Baltimore American of this morning.

I have, &c.,

DENIS DONOHOE.
[Inclosure 2 in No. 25.]

The Case of Denis O’Connor and his Claim of American Citizenship.—Mr. Denis H. O’Connor, who is now confined in prison in Ireland as a “suspect,” and over whose case quite a discussion occurred in the House of Representatives on Tuesday, was formerly a resident of Baltimore. He is a brother of Mr. P. C. O’Connor, who keeps a grocery store at the corner of Chase and Chapel streets, and is a fully naturalized citizen of the United States. Mr. P. C. O’Connor was called upon yesterday by an American reporter, and in response to inquiries, stated that his brother, Denis H. O’Connor, the prisoner alluded to, had resided in Baltimore for ten years previous to 1878, in which year, being broken down in health, he had taken a trip to Ireland, and had since made it his home. He had while in this city been an active and energetic business man, and among other houses with which he was associated were mentioned Hinkelman, Jackson, and Phelps, of Baltimore; John B. Ellison &, Son, of Philadelphia; and Dahlnen, Forbes & Co., of New York. His health-being partially restored shortly after landing in Ireland, Mr. O’Connor opened an extensive dry-goods establishment in Charleville, county Cork, and another in Kilmallock, county Limerick. His brother says that Denis was a general favorite on account of his genial disposition, but more, perhaps, on account of his outspoken love for republican institutions. When the Land League agitation commenced, O’Connor was chosen as treasurer of the Charville Branch, and so remained until arrested on the 22d October, 1881. Mr. P. C. O’Connor, on learning of the arrest of his brother, took steps to obtain his release on the ground of American citizenship. He procured a letter of introduction from Mayor Whyte to the then Secretary of State, Mr. Blaine, and proceeding to Washington, laid the whole case before Mr. Blaine. On the 25th November, 1881, Mr. P. C. O’Connor received a letter from Mr. Blaine, in which it was stated that the case was one of a class receiving the attention of the government, and would take the same course as others preceding it. Mr. Blaine also reminded Mr. O’Connor that the act of Parliament under which his brother [Page 253] is held is a law of Great Britain, and that it is an elementary principle of public law that in such cases the government of that country, in the exercise of its varied functions, judicial and executive, administers and interprets the law. The right of every government in this respect, says Mr. Blaine, is absolute and sovereign, and every person who voluntarily brings himself within the jurisdiction of the country, whether temporarily or permanently, whether he be a citizen or a mere resident, is subject to the operation of those laws so long as, in the case of the alien resident, no treaty stipulation or principle of international law is contravened by the proceedings taken against him. Mr. P. C. O’Connor has also, since the change made in the cabinet, addressed quite a long communication to Mr. Frelinghuysen on the same subject, calling his attention to cases of a similar character in years gone by, with the action of various Secretaries of State in each case. To this letter no reply has as yet been received.