No. 33.
Mr. Seward to Mr. Fish.

No. 11.]

Sir: I have the honor to transmit to you herewith a copy of a dispatch which I am addressing to Vice-Consul-General Bradford in regard to a scheme for a railroad at Shanghai. I trust that the views expressed will meet your approval.

I have, &c.,

GEORGE F. SEWARD.
[Inclosure.]

Mr. Seward to Mr. Bradford.

No. 4.]

Sir: I have learned that an engineer has arrived from England to prosecute the construction of the railroad from Shanghai to Woosung. It is altogether likely that the Chinese authorities will object to the work and appeal to you to restrain any of our countrymen who may be concerned in it. I think it well, under the circumstances, to state to you my views as to the attitude which you should assume.

The actual situation I understand to be this: The ground for the line has been purchased and paid for. The termini are Shanghai and Woosung, which latter town is ten miles below Shanghai, at the junction of the Whangpoo and Yangtsze Rivers. A line of railroad over this route would serve the convenience of foreigners in going to and from shipping detained at Woosung by a lack of water on the bar. There is a considerable Chinese population at Woosung who would assist in supporting it when opened. The ground was bought ostensibly for a maloo, (or horse-road,) and I believe that the authorities knew that rails would be laid down for a tramway.

The leading motive of the promoters of the enterprise is a desire to exhibit to the Chinese a railway in practical operation, and thus to hasten the moment for a general introduction of railways into the empire.

Every step taken thus far has been regular and defeasible, saving, perhaps, that in a strictly moral point of view the ultimate object should have been declared from the outset. That this would have defeated the enterprise there can be no doubt.

I am free to say that I sympathize most keenly with the promoters. They are striving to confer a benefit upon China. Their spirit is such that they will be perfectly [Page 44] willing to vary the plans to meet the views of the Chinese so far as these are founded upon reason or even upon prejudices, which are strongly held, and saving, always, demands to abandon the undertaking. They believe they have a right to build a road over ground which they have bought and paid for.

The promoters have been largely our countrymen. The corporation has become British.

Under these circumstances our office at Shanghai may now properly withdraw from the leading position which it has heretofore taken. Such position would not indeed be expected under the circumstances, and might be offensive to the British authorities.

But sympathizing with the purpose of the promoters as I do, and as I believe our Government will, I advise you to co-operate with the British consul and your colleagues generally in their efforts to secure the peaceable establishment of the line.

The arguments which you can best use will be of an expostulatory sort. You may say to the native authorities, why do you object to the enterprise? It is undertaken for the general benefit. It can harm no one. The procedure which has been pursued need not be considered a precedent for the future. You can always interpose treaty stipulations against the buying of lands toward interior points for other enterprises of the sort. By what right do you attempt to interfere with the use of lands acquired by foreigners? Why will you persist in a course which will seem strange and inexplicable to the people of western countries? Such and other considerations of the sort you can freely urge, and always as a last resort say that if they desire to restrain the enterprise the only practical course is to take legal action in the British court.

There will be no wisdom in assuming more of right in the premises than we can do with justice. I would avoid any declaration which would call in question the sovereignty of the Emperor over the soil and the right of his government to control works of a public nature. Eastern peoples are sufficiently likely to consider us as aggressive in the pursuit of our purposes and careless of their rights without our giving them actual facts upon which to support such a belief.

I wish every success to your efforts and those of your colleagues, and will do all I can to aid you within the lines I have laid down, and subject, of course, to the views of the Government.

I have, &c.,

GEORGE F. SEWARD.

O. B. Bradford, Esq.,
United States Vice-Consul-General.