No. 410.
General Sickles to Mr. Fish.

[Extract.]
No. 643.]

Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith a copy and translation of a memorial of the Spanish Emancipation Society, lately presented to the Cortes Constituyentes. The petitioners include a number of the most influential members of the legislative body. The main facts and arguments, showing the expediency and necessity of the immediate abolition of slavery in Cuba, are stated with unusual brevity and force. The admirable results of the liberation of the slaves in Porto Rico have greatly encouraged the friends of emancipation. The slaveholders in Cuba are at a loss for pretexts for delay now that domestic servitude in the sister island has disappeared without any disturbance of public order or diminution of the sugar crop.

The colonial minister, Mr. Suñer y Capedevila, has recently stated in the Cortes his purpose to bring forward in the name of the government a radical emancipation bill. In several conversations with me he has reaffirmed these declarations with an earnestness and warmth of expression leaving no room to doubt his zeal. It is simply a question whether the perpetual changes of ministers in this country may not interrupt the labor of Mr. Suñer, as has before happened to several of his predecessors.

The president, Mr. Pi y Margall, is equally frank and emphatic in his avowed determination to put an end to slavery in Cuba. He does not propose to wait for the suppression of the rebellion, nor for the solution of the financial crisis in the island, nor for the restoration of tranquillity in Spain. On the contrary, he regards emancipation and other cognate reforms as the best means of restoring peace and prosperity to Cuba. He assures me he desires to see Cuba and Porto Rico admitted as states in the Spanish federal union. These are, likewise, the views of the colonial minister.

Mr. Castelar, Mr. Bias Quintero, Mr. Salmeron, and other influential members of the committee appointed to draft the federal constitution, are understood to entertain similar views. * * *

I am not without hope that the political administrative and social reforms we have so long urged upon this country in the government of its American possessions may be attained by means of suitable provisions embodied in the constitution of the republic.

I am, &c.,

D. E. SICKLES.
[Inclosure A.—Translation.]

Petition of the Spanish Abolition Society to the Cortes Constituyentes, Madrid, June 1, 1873.

To the Cortes Constituyentes:

The undersigned, president, vice-president, active members, and secretaries of the Spanish Abolition Society, with the greatest respect show that, whereas—

  • First. The definitive law of abolition for Cuba has not yet been promulgated, although referred to the preparatory law of July 4, 1870, and solemnly and repeatedly promised by the Spanish government before Congress and the civilized world.
  • Second. The preparatory law of 1870, notwithstanding its urgent character, remained in suspense, as far as its principal articles were concerned, until the appearance of the regulations published in the Madrid Gazette, August 18, 1873.
  • Third. The regulations in question not only totally ignore the important inquiry of the captain-general of Cuba concerning the fulfillment of the fifth article of the preparatory law, but also, from the nature of many of their provisions, they render necessary a new set of explanatory regulations, at the same time creating institutions of the efficiency of which there can be no doubt.
  • Fourth. Notwithstanding the promulgation of the regulations in the Gaceta de Madrid nine months ago, not a single one of its provisions has yet been put into operation in Cuba.
  • Fifth. On the contrary, the superior government of the island of Cuba has decided to modify a rule of the old slave regulations which was favorable to the negroes, and to declare henceforth—and for the purpose of constraining them—that the value of a slave shall be estimated according to his personal merits, thus interposing an obstacle to emancipation.
  • Sixth. In Cuba the law of 1870 has been grossly misinterpreted, and the old emancipadors have been made to subscribe labor contract for eight or ten years, under conditions sufficient to annul such contracts for substantial error and irregularity in conformity with the express text of the Spanish law of contracts.
  • Seventh. In violation of our colonial laws and in derision of the provisions of the Porto Rican abolition law passed March 22d last, many slaves have been taken from the lesser Antilla and, as such, sold in Cuba, when their presence is a source of real danger; and, in fact, the owner of one of those unfortunate beings, has already met his death at the hands of a Porto Rican mulatto.
  • Eighth. The insurrection in Cuba has caused the dispersion of more than 55,000 slaves who do not, in point of fact, appear enrolled in the census of 1871 in the divisions corresponding to the districts of Santiago de Cuba, Las Tunas, and Moron.
  • Ninth. The partisans and upholders of the Cuban insurrection have renounced all the rights to their former slaves guaranteed to them under Spanish laws; this renunciation having been effected either indirectly, as in the case of the constitution proclaimed in the insurgent camp in April, 1869, in which (Art. 24) the absolute freedom of the negroes is declared, or else explicitly, as in the case of the rich planter, Don Miguel Aldama, who executed a full power, dated December 6, 1872, authorizing the abolition societies of Spain, Paris, and London to demand, either before the courts or from the Spanish government, the freedom granted by him to more than 1,100 slaves which had belonged to his plantations of Armonia, Santa Rosa, Concepcion, San José, and to Santo Domingo.
  • Tenth. By various judgments of councils of war and some of the ordinary courts of Cuba, dated October and November of 1870 and 1871, the state has seized, either by means of confiscation or to attack the civil responsibility, that always accompanies criminal responsibility, more than 10,000 slaves belonging to the insurgents, while article 5, of the preparatory law of 1870, declares that “the state can hold no slaves.”
  • Eleventh. Nearly two-thirds of the negroes employed in field-labor (some 292,000, according to the census of 1862) are bozales—that is, slaves surreptitiously introduced in defiance of the treaties celebrated with England in 1817 and 1835, and in contravention of existing laws in Cuba, especially since 1845.
  • Twelfth. It is notorious that the Havana journals continue to publish advertisements of the sale of negroes de nacion, a phrase which means that the slave in question is a bozal, or native African, and therefore that there is no legal right to his possession.
  • Thirteenth. In like manner advertisements continually appear in the Cuban journals offering for sale children of from four to ten years, without father or mother, thus positively showing the contemptuous way in which the stringent provision of the law of 1870, relative to the union of slave families, is violated.
  • Fourteenth. The colonial minister, notwithstanding that a national representative in the late Congress urged him to lay before the Cortes certain data relative to the execution of the law of 1870, and, among these, in particular, a statement of the number of slaves emancipated in consequence of excessive cruelty (sevicia) on the part of their owners, has not been able to communicate the data called for, because they are not in his possession.
  • Fifteenth. Among the infamous inventions of some slave-holders is an instrument for the corporal punishment of their slaves, by which blows are inflicted without breaking the skin or leaving any outward mark. Full details of this have been received by the Abolition Society, and are offered as evidence of a new violation of the law of 1870.
  • Sixteenth. It is a well-known fact circumstantially described by travellers who have recently visited the interior of Cuba, and recognized by even the bitterest enemies of abolition, that the bulk of the insurgent bands in Cuba consists of fugitive plantation negroes and Chinese run-aways, who prefer death rather than return to their former servitude.
  • Seventeenth. The burning of plantations situated in the western department and in districts like Matanzas has been recently begun, and rumor attributes these acts to the Chinese and slaves.
  • Eighteenth. The law of March 22, 1873, has begun to be put into operation in Porto [Page 1005] Rico without any indication whatever of the conflicts prophesied by its enemies; on the contrary, it has tended to quiet the agitation that existed there, and to overcome, with extraordinary rapidity, the difficulties of the political situation of that island produced by the obstinate opposition of the slave-holding element to all reform, and especially to the reforms proposed by the government of Madrid, as well as by the necessity of proceeding to an election for deputies to the Cortes under a new electoral census, whereby the number of votes would be largely increased, and under the influence of a political change of the nature of that which has brought about throughout the whole Spanish nation, the substitution of the republic for the democratic monarchy; and,
  • Nineteenth. Whereas, in contradiction of the foregoing prognostics and calumnies, of which the negro race has so long been the object, it is a fact that all the old slaves have remained spontaneously working as freedmen (libertos) on the plantations of their former masters, with the sole exception of those belonging to the few planters in Porto Rico who had become known for their cruel treatment of their slaves, against which the latter have protested, asking and obtaining the privilege of entering the service of other masters; and, further considering,

  • First. “That slavery is an outrage upon human nature, and a stigma upon the only nation that still maintains it in the civilized world,” according to the eloquent and manly declaration of the superior revolutionary Junta of Madrid on the 15th of October, 1869.
  • Second. That servitude is in every way incomprehensible in the dominions of a nation which, like the Spanish, after framing for itself the political constitution of 1869, and having recognized the existence of the natural and inalienable rights of man, has had sufficient moral force to strive for and obtain a democratic republican form of government.
  • Third. That as often as the Antilles have been consulted on the subject, just so often have their inhabitants proposed to the mother country the abolition of slavery, as is proved, among other things, by the report of the Cuban commissioners to the government in 1866, and according to the plan proposed in that report by a scheme of gradual emancipation, slavery would have already ceased to exist in 1873.
  • Fourth. That an analogous spirit has been exhibited by many of the present holders of slaves in Havana, as is shown by the meetings held by them in July and August, 1870, at the palace of the captain-general, and also by the meeting held in the early part of 1873 in the Spanish casino, in that city, in anticipation of immediate and radical action of the home government.
  • Fifth. That a portion of the Havana press has declared itself in favor of abolition, although expressing this with the reserve imposed upon the press by Cuban legislation.
  • Sixth. That even the conservative party of the peninsula was agreed in 1870, in spite of the harshness of the war in Cuba and the difficulties of home politics in Spain, upon the necessity of a definite law of emancipation, as is proved by the report of the committee, almost wholly composed of conservatives, which was appointed in the Cortes of 1869 to examine the emancipation project presented by the government.
  • Seventh. That the greatest peril of the situation in Cuba is an armed propaganda which the insurgent negroes may undertake in favor of abolition, and this danger is so evident that the military authorities have recently prohibited the transfer of negroes from the central to the western department.
  • Eighth. That, according to the opinion of the same peninsular conservatives, and perhaps as a consequence of the agitation set on foot against the law of emancipation for Porto Rico, it is a matter of fact that the reform so brilliantly and successfully realized in the lesser Antilla is exerting a positive influence on the negroes held in the cities of Cuba.
  • Ninth. That the slavery question being now one of international law, (derecho de gente,) both slavery and the former conduct of the Spanish government have been protested against by the ministers and representatives of the most authoritative of the great free peoples; while on the other hand, in foreign countries, an extraordinary movement of sympathy toward our government was occasioned by the mere presentation to the late Congress of the Porto Rico abolition law.
  • Tenth. That the retention of the bozales in bondage is a peril to the good relations between our cabinet and that of England, especially as, as is well known, the latter, at the beginning of the century, paid forty millions of reals as indemnity for the capital engaged in the slave trade, and on condition that it should be finally put a stop to.
  • Eleventh. That the ill-success of the preparatory law need not, and should not, surprise those who are familiar with the history of the emancipation of labor, wherein it is recorded that such measures have always failed, and that the legislators have been forced to resort to others more radical, such as immediate abolition, as took place in Jamaica, St. Thomas, the Dutch colonies, and is even now taking place in Brazil.
  • Twelfth. That it is an indisputable fact in the history of abolition by radical means, that it not only has falsified the blind hopes of its enemies with respect to the evil results [Page 1006] they supposed it would lead to, but it has served to restore tranquillity to countries disturbed both by the appalling prophecies and unworthy machinations of the pro-slavery party, and by other causes foreign to the problem of slavery, and referable to the general situation of those communities of which eloquent examples are found in Antigua, Guadalupe, Barbadoes, Santa Cruz, the United States, and, at the present time, Porto Rico.
  • Thirteenth. That deducting from the total number of slaves held in Cuba in 1872, (in all, 264,692, of which 2,237 were coartados,*) the bozales, and all those embargoed and confiscated from the insurgents in Cuba, it may be shown that there are not more than 70,000 negroes in that island whose possession has even a show of legality.
  • Fourteenth. That the abolition of slavery may, at the present time, be a highly politic measure to end the Cuban insurrection, while its with holdment is a continued motive of resistance, as was the case in 1793 and 1804 in the island of Santo Domingo; and
  • Fifteenth. That even supposing the insurrection in Cuba to be terminated materially without resort to certain radical measures affecting slavery, the return to the sugar plantations and farms of the many negroes who, since 1869, have been fugitives, or joined to the insurgents, would be a continual motive of sanguinary disturbances and conflicts of every kind.

The Cortes are prayed to proceed to the discussion and passage of a definitive law for the abolition of slavery in Cuba.


  • FERNANDO DE CASTRO.
  • GABRIEL RODRIGUES.
  • JOAQUIN M. SANROMA.
  • RAFAEL M. DE LABRA.
  • MANUEL RUIZ DE QUEVEDO.
  • FRANCISCO GINER.
  • F. DIAZ QUINTERO.
  • SALVADOR TORRES AGUILAR.
  • LUIS PADIAL.
  • MANUEL REGIDOR.
  • RAFAEL CERVERA.
  • LUIS VIDART.
  • BERNARDO GARCIA.
  • FELIX DE BONA.
  • ANTONIO CARRASCO.
  • FRANCISCO DELGADO.
  • RICARDO LOPEZ VASQUES.
  • JULIO VISCARRONDO.
  • J. F. CINTRON.
  • M. PADILLA.
  1. Coartado da.—An adjective applied to the male or female slave who has agreed with the owner upon the sum to be paid as ransom, and who has already paid him a part thereof, in which case such slave cannot he sold.—Dict. Span. Acad.