Mr. Perry to Mr.
Seward
No. 162.]
Legation oF the United States,
Madrid,
February 4, 1865.
Sir: I received last night a telegram from our
consul at Vigo informing me that a confederate pirate steamer had
entered the port of Oorunna for repairs. He gives the vessel’s name
Stonewall, but I received also a private advice late last night that the
ship is the Shenandoah. Copies of these documents go enclosed, as well
as another from the consular agent at Corunna, which I at first supposed
to refer to some blockade runner, and treated accordingly.
Before daylight to-day the enclosed telegrams had been sent to the consul
at Vigo, to the consular agent at Corunna, to the minister of the United
States at London, to the chargé d’affaires at Paris, to the minister at
Lisbon, and to the consuls at Cadiz and Gibraltar. I trust that from
some one of these points a government cruiser can be notified in time to
block the egress of the pirate from the bay.
I have also written the note to Mr. Benavides, of which a copy goes
enclosed, and as soon as the hour permitted this morning, sought him at
his own house, and placed the note in his hands. I showed him also the
account given by our consul at Teneriffe on the 29th October last, of
the operation effected between the Laurel and the Sea King, since
Shenandoah or Stonewall, and the royal decree of June 17,1861, and
copies of the telegrams I had sent to our consuls. And I said, also,
that I had not wished to indicate in my note any step to be taken by her
Majesty’s government in preference to another, but I had made a
statement of the facts as I understood them, and preferred to leave to
the spontaneous action of her Majesty’s government the proper remedy. I
did not, however, myself see how Spain could ever permit that vessel to
leave her ports again as a privateer. The article first of the royal
decree of June 17th could have but one meaning, and though my government
had made no reclamation against Spain for the first arming and equipping
of this pirate in her waters unbeknown to her authorities, yet, now that
the vessel had come again within her jurisdiction, and within the power
of her authorities, if she were again allowed to depart, it could not
fail to be the motive of grave reclamations from the government at
Washington.
Mr. Benavides said, what you wish, then, is that we should disarm the
corsair? I said, what would you do if an armed force engaged in
insurrection in France should pass the Spanish frontier? Mr. Benavides
replied, we should take away their arms.
I then asked if there was any motive why this corsair should be treated
otherwise? Mr. Benavides said, in his own opinion, there was not; and,
besides, this particular ship seemed to be doubly guilty.
I added, that, in my opinon, she must at least be disarmed completely,
both under the dictates of international law and the provisions of the
municipal law of Spain.
Mr. Benavides took my note and said that he would attend to the affair
immediately, and have it set right this day.
I shall advise you hereafter what course is taken by this government.
With the highest respect, sir, your obedient servant,
Hon. William H. Seward,
Secretary of State, Washington.
[Page 474]
[Telegram.—Vigo, 3.]
Minister of the United States:
The confederate war steamer Stonewall has entered Corunna to repair
damages.
[Translation.]
United States Consul at Vigo:
Protest with energy against every kind of repairs and succors for the
confederate corsair which is at Corunna.
PERRY, Chargé
d’Affaires.
[Telegram.]
United States Consular Agent at Corunna:
Protest with energy and warmth to the authorities against every kind
of repair and succor to the confederate corsair which is in your
district.
PERRY, Chargé
d’Affaires.
[Telegram.]
His Excellency the Minister of the United States at
London:
A confederate pirate, supposed the Shenandoah, has entered Corunna
and asks for repairs. Advice to whom it may concern.
PERRY, American
Legation.
[Telegram.]
To United States Chargé d’Affaires at
Paris:
A confederate corsair is at Corunna, and asks for repairs. Notify our
shipping.
[Telegram.]
Minister of United States at Lisbon:
The confederate corsair Shenandoah is at Corunna asking for repairs.
Notify our ships.
[Telegram.]
United States Consul at Gibraltar:
The confederate pirate steamer Shenandoah is at Corunna seeking to
repair damages. Notify our ships.
[Telegram.]
United States Consul at Cadiz:
The confederate pirate Shenandoah is at Corunna to repair damages.
Notify our ships-of-war and merchantmen.
[Translation.]
Legation of the United States at
Madrid,
Morning of the 4th of
February, 1865.
Sir: I have the honor to inform your
excellency that a privateer steamer, under the flag of those
citizens who are in rebellion against the government of the United
States, has entered the port of Corunna and asks to repair her
damages. I have sent instructions by telegraph to the consul of the
United States in Vigo, and to the consular agent in Corunna, to
protest with energy and persistence before the local authorities
against the furnishing of every kind of repairs, provisions, and
succor to the privateer.
This is, according to my information, the last (for all the rest are
either destroyed or captured)
[Page 475]
of those English vessels which sailed with
English armament and crews to make piratical war against the
merchant ships of the United States, displaying on the seas the flag
of the insurgents in my country, into whose ports, however, they
never entered.
I have extra official information that the English authorities of the
Bahamas, obeying the instructions of the government at London, have
arrested in the port of Nassau the vessel, sister to the one now at
Corunna, for having mocked the laws and sovereignty of England by
equipping herself under that flag for war against a government with
which that of England is at peace.
The vessel which is now within the jurisdiction of her Catholic
Majesty was armed as a privateer in the waters of the Canary
islands, in mockery of the royal decree of June 17, 1861. According
to the information on file in this legation this vessel, which was
called the Sea King, sailed from London with a cargo of coals
ostensibly for Bombay. At the same time another steamer, the Laurel,
sailed from the port of Liverpool with heavy cannon and carriages in
her hold, and a great number of seamen as passengers for Teneriffe,
in the Canaries. The two vessels met at a retired anchorage in those
islands, and the transhipment of the cannon and war material with
the seamen took place from the Laurel to the Sea King, which then
hoisted the flag, not recognized, of the insurgents of my country,
and started in search of prizes, while the Laurel entered the port
of Teneriffe with the old crew of the Sea King, and set them on
shore. These men returned to England in the mail steamer Calabar,
and as soon as they arrived the captain was arrested by the English
government at the instance of the representative of the United
States, the rest of the crew showing their ignorance of the project
which the captain had executed, and that they had refused to serve
aboard the Sea King as soon as they learned her true character.
This vessel, taking another name, began her depredations, and I have
news of three ships of the United States with their cargoes burned
and destroyed by this vessel on the high seas without the formality
of a condemnation as good prize by any tribunal, legitimate or
simulated. The nature of such proceedings, even supposing that the
flag was that of some known government, is well known to your
excellency. And this pirate takes refuge now in the waters of the
Spanish jurisdiction, asking to repair his damages after having
violated the terms of the royal decree of June 1.7, 1861.
Although that decree wounded the rights and sovereignty of the United
States in declaring belligerents in an international sense the
insurgents who fight under an unknown flag against their own
government, which is at peace with Spain, and although the term
neutrality in the sense of abstention by any nation from a war waged
between other known powers has not been well applied in this decree,
still, as it shows patent in its text the desire and resolution of
her Majesty’s government not to take any part in that intestine
conflict of the United States, and not to permit any one within the
Spanish jurisdiction to aid those insurgents, I have no difficulty
in citing it as a Spanish law which this corsair has violated. And
this vessel being now within the power of her Majesty’s government,
the undersigned mentions these facts in the firm conviction that
your excellency will not fail to take, as promptly as the case
requires, those measures which the government of her Majesty may
think most proper to vindicate its own dignity and outraged
sovereignty, and which will he suggested by the friendship and good
dispositions it cherishes towards that of the United States.
I avail myself of this opportunity to renew to your excellency the
assurance of my most distinguished consideration.
His Excellency Minister of State.