125. Embtel 177.22. Dated August 17.
(Ibid.) Dept shares your view that disruptive oppositionist
political activities by Balaguer
and Bosch on U.S. soil are
undesirable at this critical juncture. Prospects for future political
stability and economic development in DR
depend to large degree on successful implementation of stabilization
program. Obstacles to carrying out program are presently formidable
enough without adding stepped up harassment of GODR by Balaguer and
Bosch from U.S.
(1) U.S. has given strong support to DR
since Trujillo's death and cooperated closely with govts of both
Balaguer and Bosch in interests DOM people. We made
our opposition to Sept. coup crystal clear, and offered hospitality to
leading members of deposed regime.
(2) We continue hope for earliest possible return to constitutional and
representative government. Interim Reid Govt. knows this and when conditions are propitious
we will exert our influence in every way possible to encourage such a
return. However, Bosch and
Balaguer as realistic men
surely recognize that prerequisite conditions for meaningful elections
or return to constitutional regime do not presently exist. As patriotic
men they wish to see country once again enjoy a democratic order. First
order of business in creating necessary climate is overcoming financial
crisis. Balaguer and Bosch, along with U.S., therefore have
real stake in success of stabilization program.
(3) Fall of Reid regime at this
time could benefit no one except perhaps small clique of power-hungry
trujillistas and reactionary military. DOM people would be the victims
of this step backward. Neither Bosch nor Balaguer
can hope for advantage from political overturn under these conditions.
(In using this line we assume latter is sincere in professed refusal
consider coming to power except through democratic methods.)
(4) U.S. has committed resources and prestige to stabilization program,
not to further interests of any politician or political group, but
because program is necessary to future well-being of DOM people. We are
therefore particularly concerned by activities on U.S. soil which
endanger program and which many undoubtedly believe we sanction, but
which abuse our hospitality. In making this point we refer specifically
to activities on U.S. soil. Publications and broadcasts within DR are internal matter. We are gratified to
note that freedom of expression continues exist to large extent in
DR and have assurances from GODR that it will not interfere with
publication of opposition views which do not violate DOM libel laws or
are not patently seditious. (FYI—Bonilla has given us such assurances. He has also stated
that playing of taped broadcasts made abroad by Balaguer and Bosch will be permitted in DR if two men observe libel laws, refrain from open calls
to sedition and cease using foreign media and radio stations for
agitation. You may wish check this point with Reid.)
These are general points only. Approach will vary somewhat considering
differing interests and personalities of two men and according to how
conversations go but intent will be to make clear to each individual
that speeches and broadcasts they have made in U.S. involve the U.S. in
internal Dominican politics, which we cannot condone.
Foregoing method of dealing with problem through Bosch and Balaguer themselves appears most feasible in view
complexities involved in attempting to approach stations involved and in
view constitutional guaranty of freedom of speech.
1 Source: National Archives and
Records Administration, RG 59, Central Files 1964–66, POL 30–2 DOM
REP. Confidential; Priority. Drafted by Shlaudeman and approved by Crockett.