273. Memorandum From the Republic of China Country Director (Bennett) to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs (Berger)1

SUBJECT

  • U.S. Presence on the Offshore Islands

Recalling your interest in having the facts about the U.S. presence on the offshore islands, I took the opportunity while in Taipei to ask Art Hummel to have the Embassy put together an inventory for our reference. The attached letter from Art and its inclosure2 is the result.

To me the striking thing in this report is the extent to which the GRC has committed its effective forces to the offshore islands, including six of the GRC’s fourteen forward-look divisions plus supporting armor and artillery. According to the report this constitutes nearly half of the best ground forces available to the GRC.

While in Taipei and at CINCPAC, I asked the military their assessment of the defensibility of the offshores. The general consensus was that except for one small island held by irregular forces (Wu-ch’iu Hsu), the other large islands would be very difficult and costly for the Communists to take. However, those with whom I spoke acknowledged that the Communists, were they willing to pay the cost, would probably be able to establish air superiority over the islands, thus putting themselves in a position to interdict resupply operations. The garrisons under these circumstances would be unable to hold out indefinitely, the effect on their morale would be severe, and pressures for U.S. military involvement would be very high. On the other hand, there was general agreement that any frontal assault on the islands would be almost prohibitively costly and that in any air battle over the Strait the kill ratio would probably be heavily in favor of the CAF. There was also general agreement that there is no sign of increased ChiCom activity in the offshore island area.

Attachment

U.S. ACTIVITIES ON THE OFFSHORE ISLANDS3

The most visible relationship of the U.S. with the Offshore islands is the MAP support given almost all GRC troops stationed there. A small [Page 586] but significant economic aid program has also been carried on in the Offshores, and USIS loans books and tapes to a GRC military reading room on Kinmen. In addition, the U.S. and the GRC participate in joint (secret) contingency planning for possible U.S. participation in the defense of the islands. The GRC has actively sought to enliven the interest of individual Americans in and out of government in the islands, especially Kinmen, by encouraging their visits there. Top GRC officials may hope that these visits together with the present (small-scale) U.S. involvement on the Offshore islands will influence the U.S. to assist in their defense in the event of another Communist attack.

1955 Conditional Commitment

The Congressional Resolution of January 1955 authorized the President to use U.S. forces for the defense of Taiwan and the Penghus and for “the securing and protection of such related positions and territories of that area now in friendly hands and the taking of such other measures as he judges to be required or appropriate in assuring the defense of Formosa and the Pescadores.” The Executive view of defense of related positions and territories was outlined in President Eisenhower’s message to Congress asking the authority conveyed in the Resolution. Eisenhower said he would act “only in situations which are recognizable as parts of, or definite preliminaries to, an attack against the main positions of Formosa and the Pescadores.”

The U.S. intent has since been publicly reaffirmed in high level statements at least seven times during both the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations, most notably during the 1958 Kinmen crisis and most recently by President Kennedy in June 1962. In each instance we have made clear that a U.S. defense of the Offshores would depend on our evaluation of the ChiCom attack at hand. Of significance, nonetheless, was the public development of the doctrine in the 1958 crisis. Secretary Dulles, with the intensive bombardment of Kinmen two weeks underway, warned Communist China in a statement September 4 that the defense of the two island groups had “increasingly become related to the defense of Taiwan.” President Eisenhower in a radio-TV address a week later was more explicit: “If the present bombardment and harassment of Quemoy should be converted into a major assault, with which the local defenders could not cope, then we would be compelled to face precisely the situation that Congress visualized in 1955.”

U.S. Military Assistance and US–GRC Planning for Joint Defense of the Offshores

The most important U.S. relationship with the Offshores is the MAP support extended to most of the GRC forces stationed in the Offshores and U.S. participation in secret, joint contingency planning for US–GRC defense of the islands. MAP support was originally not given to GRC [Page 587] forces in Kinmen and Matsu, but was gradually extended as a result of MAP supported units on Taiwan being rotated to the islands. Military assistance for these forces can also be viewed as preparation for the contingency in which the U.S. might undertake to defend the islands.

All 64,500 troops in the Kinmen complex (including five Forward Look infantry divisions and supporting units and one Air Force anti-aircraft regiment) are MAP supported. Of the 24,800 GRC troops in the Matsu complex, 21,800 (including one Forward Look and one light infantry division and their supporting units along with one Air Force anti-aircraft regiment) are MAP supported. The remaining 3,000 non-MAP supported troops in Matsu are the para-military Anti-Communist National Salvation Corps. Thus, about one-sixth of the 544,000 MAP supported GRC forces are deployed on the Offshores. Altogether six of the 14 Forward Look divisions plus supporting armor and artillery, the GRC’s most modernized and combat ready ground forces, are in the Offshores. The GRC’s allocation of nearly half of its best ground forces to these islands is perhaps the clearest manifestation of the importance it attaches to the Offshores. The figures in this paragraph are those compiled by MAAG, which frequently differ somewhat from those compiled by the Ministry of National Defense, the source of the Embassy’s quarterly troop strength reports.

Advising the GRC commands in the Offshores is a MAAG,team of five officers and one enlisted man on Kinmen and a MAAG team of three officers and one enlisted man on Matsu, although additional MAAG advisers are frequently brought in temporarily to assist in more specialized problems. (One MAAG adviser on Kinmen [less than 1 line of source text not declassified].) The U.S. presence at both locations is made somewhat more prominent by the MAAG teams’ flying the American flag.

Contingency U.S. participation in the defense of the two island groups is provided for in Plan Rochester, the comprehensive plan for the joint US–GRC defense of Taiwan and the Penghus pursuant to the 1954 Mutual Defense Treaty. The U.S. Taiwan Defense Command first drafted the plan with the Ministry of National Defense in 1955 and together with the Ministry has kept it updated. The current plan’s premise for contingency employment of U.S. forces in the defense of the Offshores envisages possible provision of U.S. naval and air forces to supplement those of the GRC with the objective of gaining air and naval superiority in the Strait. No deployment of U.S. ground forces to the islands is contemplated by the contingency plan, the land defense being left to GRC ground forces then in place.

Officers of the U.S. Taiwan Defense Command who are engaged in joint planning find their Chinese counterparts well aware of the conditional nature of the 1955 Congressional Resolution. Many Chinese officers seem convinced, however, that the Presidential determination has [Page 588] already been made for a number of hypothecated contingencies, and they frequently try to sound out U.S. officers concerning these assumed decisions. Some Chinese military officers also argue that a future contingency would not be materially different from the 1958 crisis, and that the U.S. response would therefore be the same.

U.S. Economic Assistance in the Offshore Islands

U.S. economic assistance in the Offshores constitutes a small but still significant part of the current U.S. involvement in the islands. Total direct assistance has amounted over the years to about US$2.3 million, which while comprising only a fractional 0.15% of the total US$1.5 billion of U.S. economic aid given the GRC, is on a per capita basis higher than that for Taiwan proper. Direct U.S. aid for FY67 amounted to about US$133,000, the bulk of which went to Kinmen. Almost half the islands’ population is estimated to have been reached by these programs. Assistance now is divided between two projects: first, PL480 agricultural surplus commodities channeled through voluntary agencies, which came to about US$70,000 in the current fiscal year but which is scheduled to be terminated after FY68; and second, the school lunch program totalling about US$63,000 for the current school year. (Financed from SAFED GRC owned SAFED funds, and administered by the GRC, the JCRR program in FY67 funnelled better than US$400,000 into irrigation, reforestation, crop improvement, livestock, fishing and sanitation.)

Miscellaneous Activities in the Offshores

Two other minor items round out U.S. activities on Kinmen and Matsu. USIS about a year ago began loaning to a small Chinese military reading room on Kinmen a limited quantity of books (about 300), rec-ords, and films along with a tape recorder and projector. Secondly, TOEFEL tests (the English language test required of Chinese students headed for study in the States) have since last year been administered several times a year by a consular officer who visits the islands for this purpose. Only a small number of students have taken the tests there.

Visits to the Offshores

For a number of years the GRC has actively encouraged a wide range of Americans, official and unofficial, to visit Kinmen (similar visits to Matsu, to which access is more difficult, are infrequent). The GRC’s probable purpose is to try to enliven U.S. interest in the Offshores and create an identification with them which would strengthen the sense of U.S. commitment to their defense. The Kinmen visits are intended to impress Americans in the short space of a day with the formidable defense works and the economic development program the GRC has brought into being on Communist China’s doorstep. News coverage which frequently follows the visits tends to add to the impression of U.S. identification with the Offshores.

  1. Source: Department of State, ROC Files: Lot 74 D 25, POL 27 Offshore Islands, 1968–1969. Secret.
  2. The letter from Hummel to Bennett, July 3, is not printed.
  3. The report, not dated, was drafted by John A. Froebe, Jr., on June 30.