345. Memorandum of Conversation Between McCone and John Foster Dulles1

[Facsimile Page 1]

Mr. McCone handed me the attached memorandum on a limited test moratorium and asked my views regarding it. I said that I thought that there should be urgent thinking along the lines of a constructive proposal on suspension of testing as if there were a possible outcome of the Geneva talk of experts, some such action was imperative. I said I thought it would in any event be imperative for the next General Assembly, particularly having regard to certain aspects of the prospective UN report of experts.

[Typeset Page 1395]

Mr. McCone thought it would be very helpful for Murphy if he were stopping in Rome to talk with Cardinal Agaganiar who he thinks is better acquainted with problems in Lebanon than anyone else in the world. He is an Armenian and has lived in Lebanon.

JFD

Attachment

Teletype Message to McCone From Libby and Teller

[Facsimile Page 2]

TELETYPE MESSAGE TO JOHN McCONE FROM

AEC COMMISSIONER WILLARD F. LIBBY AND DR. EDWARD TELLER, DIRECTOR OF THE LIVERMORE RESEARCH LABORATORY

A LIMITED TEST MORATORIUM

People everywhere feel a great concern about the possible effects of radioactive fallout from weapon tests. A most powerful objection to continued testing would be removed if radioactive fallout from future tests could be limited or eliminated. One of the following two plans would, therefore, seem reasonable.

We might propose to limit the offsite fission fallout per year to 1 megaton equivalent each year released by the USA and the same amount by the USSR.

An alternative proposal would be to ban completely offsite fallout. This would permit underground testing by everyone.

The task of policing such a moratorium would be simplest in the latter case, but it does seem clear from our knowledge of radioactive fallout from weapons tests that it would be possible to conduct tests on the fallout ration basis.

It is of extreme importance at this time to put forth such a plan of test limitation. It would exploit the amount of agreement already obtained in Geneva. At the same time it would permit us to continue what kind of testing which is necessary to develop our tactical weapons, our clean weapons, and our lightweight warheads for intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Limitation of fallout to 1 megaton a year would, furthermore, permit some effects shots, such as are needed in developing the anti-ICBM system.

If we do not announce our willingness to accept a limitation such as the one given above we may be forced by public opinion into a [Typeset Page 1396] complete test cessation. According to the opinion of all reliable authorities small shots below 5 kilotons can be effectively hidden. Methods to hide bigger explosions may well be discovered and such methods may already be available in the Soviet Union.

[Facsimile Page 3]

It is most important for the defense of our country and also for the development of the peaceful uses of nuclear explosives that continued study of nuclear explosions take place. The proposed test limitation would permit continued testing in a calmer and more reasonable atmosphere. We believe, therefore, that it is important to put forward a proposal of this kind in the very near future.

  1. Source: Dulles reacts negatively to a paper by Libby and Teller urging testing limitations. Confidential; Personal and Private. 3 pp. Eisenhower Library, Dulles Papers, General Memoranda of Conversation.