174. Memorandum of Conversation with the President1
Washington, July 7, 1959, 12:10
p.m.
[Facsimile Page 1]
PRESENT
- Bryce Harlow
- General Goodpaster
- Gordon Gray
I first informed the President that Mr. McElroy had asked whether Admiral Radford might attend the
meeting of the National Security Council on Thursday, July 9. I indicated to
the President that I had some question about the wisdom of this course. The
President felt to the contrary; that inasmuch as Mr. McElroy had made Admiral Radford his
Military Advisor during the absence of General
Twining; and if Mr. McElroy wished him present, he should be allowed to
attend.
[Typeset Page 772]
Mr. Harlow and I then discussed with the President the situation appertaining
to the Jackson Committee investigation. The President approved the
guidelines, attached, as a basis for Mr. Harlow’s discussion with Senator
Jackson.
Gordon
Gray
Special Assistant to the President
Enclosure
Paper Prepared by the NSC
[Facsimile Page 2]
PROPOSED GUIDELINES
1. The proposed study would not involve a Congressional investigation of
the National Security Council.
2. The Executive Branch personnel would not be asked to testify with
respect to the substantive consideration of matters by the National
Security Council or its subordinate machinery. The operating Departments
of Government would provide any testimony about their policies or
activities and without reference to substantive consideration of such
matters by the National Security Council or its subordinate
machinery.
3. Study of the National Security Council and its subordinate machinery
would be limited to matters involving composition, organization and
procedures. Executive Branch officials would be authorized to make full
disclosure as to such matters subject to appropriate security safeguards
in case of classified projects.
4. Any testimony by present or former Government officials regarding the
National Security Council and its subordinate machinery would be taken
in Executive session. Consideration of the publication of such testimony
taken in Executive session would be as agreed between the Subcommittee
and a representative designated by the President. This Presidential
representative would be authorized to attend all hearings of the
Subcommittee relating to the National Security Council or its
subordinate machinery, and would be
[Facsimile Page 3]
provided a transcript of the
testimony taken in Executive session as a basis for reaching the
decisions as to publication referred to above.
5. It would be understood that the purpose of testimony regarding the
composition, organization and procedures of the National Security
Council and its subordinate machinery would be for background
information in considering various proposals for new legislation. Such
testimony would not be intended to generate legislative proposals
designed
[Typeset Page 773]
to
delimit the Constitutional privilege of the President to obtain advice
through such organization and procedures as he deems appropriate.