174. Memorandum of Conversation with the President1
Washington, July 7, 1959, 12:10
p.m.
[Facsimile Page 1]
PRESENT
- Bryce Harlow
- General Goodpaster
- Gordon Gray
I first informed the President that Mr. McElroy had asked whether Admiral Radford might attend
the meeting of the National Security Council on Thursday, July 9. I
indicated to the President that I had some question about the wisdom of
this course. The President felt to the contrary; that inasmuch as Mr.
McElroy had made Admiral
Radford his Military Advisor during the absence of General Twining; and if Mr. McElroy wished him present, he should
be allowed to attend.
[Typeset Page 772]
Mr. Harlow and I then discussed with the President the situation
appertaining to the Jackson Committee investigation. The President
approved the guidelines, attached, as a basis for Mr. Harlow’s
discussion with Senator Jackson.
Gordon
Gray
Special Assistant to the President
Enclosure
Paper Prepared by the NSC
[Facsimile Page 2]
PROPOSED GUIDELINES
1. The proposed study would not involve a Congressional investigation
of the National Security Council.
2. The Executive Branch personnel would not be asked to testify with
respect to the substantive consideration of matters by the National
Security Council or its subordinate machinery. The operating
Departments of Government would provide any testimony about their
policies or activities and without reference to substantive
consideration of such matters by the National Security Council or
its subordinate machinery.
3. Study of the National Security Council and its subordinate
machinery would be limited to matters involving composition,
organization and procedures. Executive Branch officials would be
authorized to make full disclosure as to such matters subject to
appropriate security safeguards in case of classified projects.
4. Any testimony by present or former Government officials regarding
the National Security Council and its subordinate machinery would be
taken in Executive session. Consideration of the publication of such
testimony taken in Executive session would be as agreed between the
Subcommittee and a representative designated by the President. This
Presidential representative would be authorized to attend all
hearings of the Subcommittee relating to the National Security
Council or its subordinate machinery, and would be
[Facsimile Page 3]
provided a transcript
of the testimony taken in Executive session as a basis for reaching
the decisions as to publication referred to above.
5. It would be understood that the purpose of testimony regarding the
composition, organization and procedures of the National Security
Council and its subordinate machinery would be for background
information in considering various proposals for new legislation.
Such testimony would not be intended to generate legislative
proposals designed
[Typeset Page 773]
to delimit the Constitutional privilege of the
President to obtain advice through such organization and procedures
as he deems appropriate.