138. Progress Report From the SEATO Military Advisers to the SEATO Council1

1.
The Military Advisers attach for the consideration of the Council a Progress Report which contains—
(a)
A summary of the work accomplished by the Military Advisers since the Council last met at Karachi in March, 1956;
(b)
The Programme of future work (paragraphs 30 and 31).
2.
The Military Advisers recommended that the Council—
(a)
Note this progress report;
(b)
Note that the SEATO Military Advisers have approved strategic concepts and intelligence studies2 on which detailed planning and preparations will be based. (Details of these approvals are contained in the Report of the Third Military Advisers Meeting at Baguio—MA 3rd M).3
(c)
Note the principles and the procedure for the staging of SEATO Military Exercises which have been approved by the Military Advisers (paragraph 24).
(d)
Endorse the following specific recommendations of the Military Advisers:—
(i)
The convening at an early date of a meeting of civil and military representatives to study the problem of quasi-overt aggression and to make recommendations to the Council for effective counter action (paragraph 20).
(ii)
The principle that the financial requirements of the SEATO Military Planning Office should be budgeted and controlled in accordance with SEATO civil procedure, suitably amended (paragraph 29).
(iii)
The military budgets—
(i) 1st January, 1957–31st March, 1957 $3,575
(ii) 1st April, 1957–30th June, 1958 $88,320 (paragraph 29).
(iv)
The appointment of an Accountant and Budget Officer, whose salary would be shared equally by the Civil and Military sides (paragraph 29).
[Page 296]

[Attachment]

PROGRESS REPORT TO THE SEATO COUNCIL FROM THE MILITARY ADVISERS, CANBERRA, MARCH, 1957

Introduction

1. This report contains a summary of the work accomplished by the Military Advisers since the Council last met at Karachi in March, 1956. At that meeting the Council was advised of the programme of future work that had been drawn up. In the main all programmed work has been accomplished.

2. Since March, 1956, we have had further meetings at Baguio in September, 1956, and at Canberra in March, 1957. In addition our staffs have met on a number of occasions as follows:—

(a)
Ad Hoc Threat Evaluation Sub-committee—Pearl Harbour—March, 1956.
(b)
Third Military Staff Planners Conference—Singapore—June, 1956.
(c)
Ad Hoc Military Finance Committee—Bangkok—October, 1956.
(d)
Ad Hoc Intelligence Sub-committee—Singapore—December, 1956.
(e)
Ad Hoc Communications Sub-committee—Pearl Harbour—January, 1957.

3. These meetings have made significant contributions to progress in the SEATO military field, and their recommendations form the basis both of the recommendations we wish to make to the Council at their present meeting and of the work we plan to proceed with in the coming year.

Summary of Work Since March, 1956

Permanent Planning Office

4. One of the most significant actions by the Military Advisers has been the establishment of the SEATO Permanent Planning Office which opened at Bangkok on 1st March, 1957. This organisation provides the best means of ensuring continuity in SEATO military planning. It will also co-ordinate and expedite the detailed planning which must follow from the broad strategic concepts already developed and forms a sound nucleus for any expansion in an emergency. Additionally its establishment will reduce the need for ad hoc meetings.

[Page 297]

Location of Future Meetings of Military Advisers

5. The Military Advisers have concluded that it would be desirable and more economical for all future meetings of the Military Advisers to be held at Bangkok, with the possible exception of those meetings immediately preceding Council meetings. We have directed the Chief, SEATO Military Planning Office, to submit at our next meeting a proposed financial procedure whereby “out-of-pocket” expenses incurred by Thailand in staging Military Advisers’ meetings at Bangkok would be charged against the SEATO military budget.

The Strategic Concepts for the Defence of South East Asia

6. In line with the approved decision of the Second Military Advisers’ Conference,4 strategic concepts have been developed for the defence of South East Asia, including East Pakistan in the event of aggression by:—

(a)
Viet Minh forces.
(b)
Chinese Communist and Viet Minh forces; or by the Chinese Communists alone.

7. In general these concepts require that:—

(a)
All possible steps should be taken to ensure that the protocol states do not fall to the Communists by subversion or war by proxy.
(b)
In the event of it being decided that an act of overt aggression has been committed by Viet Minh and/or Chinese Communist forces, and that SEATO military counter-action should be taken, this should be:—
(i)
To initiate immediately air attacks, including the use of nuclear weapons against selected targets of military importance in the territory of the aggressor states;
(ii)
To provide air interdiction of the enemy’s advance;
(iii)
To provide naval and air support to SEATO or indigenous forces;
(iv)
To deploy well-supported ground forces to secure the key areas;
(v)
To maintain sea and air communications and deny them to the enemy;
(vi)
As early as possible to go over to the offensive exploiting SEATO’s amphibious and airborne capabilities to clear the enemy from the occupied areas;
(vii)
To be prepared to conduct expanded military operations to complete the destruction of the enemy.

8. These strategic concepts are considered to be a major advance over the defence concepts previously studied.

[Page 298]

Strategic Concept for the Defence of West Pakistan in Global War

9. A strategic concept for the defence of West Pakistan in a global war, using nuclear weapons, if required, was approved. The development of the strategy was limited because of its global implications. It was agreed that Pakistan should produce a further position paper on the defence of West Pakistan in global war in relationship to enemy strategy in the Middle East area.

Overall Threat Evaluation to the Treaty Area

10. As a basis for the preparation of the strategic concepts discussed above, detailed studies were made of the net Chinese Communist and Viet Minh threat to various parts of the Treaty Area after SEATO air attacks. These studies have been consolidated into an overall estimate of the Communist threat to the Treaty Area taking into account the threat of aggression by overt military and/or subversive means.

11. The evaluation of the overt threat took into account the effect of initial attacks of SEATO air, both conventional and nuclear upon selected military targets. The importance of this study cannot be over emphasized since SEATO strategy in the event of overt aggression is predominantly based on the effective use of SEATO nuclear air power. This concept agrees with the decision noted by the Council at their meeting in March, 1956, as the most effective one to adopt in the event of overt aggression to the Treaty Area.

Overt Communist Threat to the Philippines

12. A study of the overt Communist threat to the Philippines was approved for use as a basis for future planning studies.

Overt Communist Threat to East Pakistan

13. A study was made of the overt Communist threat to East Pakistan. This, too, will be used as a basis for future planning studies.

Defence of West Pakistan Against Afghanistan

14. We have considered a study on the defence of West Pakistan in view of the Communist-inspired threat posed by Afghanistan. In view of the possibility of this threat from Afghanistan being subject to change as a result of outside assistance we have decided to keep this subject under review.

Concept for the Defence of the Treaty Area in Conditions of Global War

15. We have considered the question of developing a concept for the defence of the Treaty Area in conditions of global war. It was [Page 299] considered it can be assumed that the residual threat to the mainland of South East Asia in such conditions would be no greater, and may be less, than that in limited war. It appears we can reasonably proceed on the assumption that our military studies for limited war in South East Asia will be adaptable for global war conditions.

16. We have previously agreed that SEATO military planning for the defence of West Pakistan in global war must be co-ordinated with the overall planning for the defence of the Middle East area.

17. The Pakistan Military Adviser does not agree with the view expressed in paragraph 15 above and considers that a concept for the defence of the Treaty Area in global war should be developed if the necessary political clearance can be obtained.

Military Measures Required to Counter the Threat to the Security of the Treaty Area Through Quasi-Overt Military Action.

18. Quasi-overt military action is defined as follows:—

Armed action, under conditions which do not permit it to be identified as overt aggression, by organized bands or groups responsive in varying degrees to foreign control or direction.

19. We have approved an initial study of this problem from the military point of view which has been forwarded to the Council Representatives. The following conclusions were reached in this study:—

(a)
Quasi-overt military action can be successfully contained or defeated in a nation capable of maintaining internal order. The immediate solution to the threat is the development, by each of the countries of the Treaty Area of the capability to maintain internal order.
(b)
The following counter measures against quasi-overt military action are a responsibility of the Government of the countries concerned:—
(i)
Intelligence operations;
(ii)
Unconventional warfare;
(iii)
Conventional military operations.
(c)
The following military measures which SEATO may take under present conditions:—
(i)
Continuing existing measures to strengthen the indigenous forces of those countries most directly threatened by quasi-overt military action; and
(ii)
Providing special aid in support of (b) (i), (ii) and (iii); are limited to assisting and supporting the counter-measures undertaken by individual member nations of the Treaty Area.
(d)
The assistance and support given by SEATO cannot exceed that which the South East Asian countries are willing and able to accept.
(e)
There is a need for co-ordinating civil and military measures with a view to taking effective counter-action against quasi-overt military action.

20. We recommend to the Council that they convene at an early date a meeting of civil and military representatives to study the problem of quasi-overt aggression and to make recommendations to the Council for effective counter-action.

SEATO Exercises

21. We have approved a schedule of SEATO exercises for the year 1956–57 and the following exercises have been conducted:—

(a)
Exercise “Albatross”—an elementary maritime exercise sponsored by Australia—October, 1956.
(b)
Exercise “Ridhee”—a combined air/ground operations centre staff exercise sponsored by Thailand—January, 1957.

22. Exercise “Teamwork”, a bilateral amphibious exercise, was conducted jointly by the United States and Thailand in October, 1956.

23. Further SEATO exercises projected for the current year include—

(a)
Exercise “Astra”—a maritime exercise sponsored by the United Kingdom—April, 1957.
(b)
A small force naval gunfire support exercise sponsored jointly by the United States and the Philippines—April, 1957.
(c)
A small force close air support exercise sponsored jointly by Thailand and the United States—May, 1957.

In addition certain bilateral and multilateral exercises may be conducted.

24. We have agreed to principles and to a procedure for the staging of SEATO exercises and recommend that the Council take note of the principles and the use of this procedure, a copy of which is attached.5

SEATO Atomic Warfare Orientation Course

25. A course, conducted by the U.S. Military Adviser, was held at Pearl Harbour in February, 1957. The course was designed “to provide to SEATO planning officers a general background knowledge of atomic weapons, their uses and effects, in order to broaden the capabilities of SEATO planners and to facilitate the atomic phases of SEATO planning studies”. The course proved most valuable and provided [Page 301] much useful material on which realistic training programmes may be based.

Communications

26. The conduct of SEATO military exercises and the establishment of the Military Planning Office in Bangkok have brought to light a number of communications problems. Progress has been made towards the solution of these problems, but, while a need exists for a general crypto system, none is yet available.

Military Assistant to Civilian Public Relations Officer

27. We have accepted the invitation of the Council to appoint a military assistant to the Civilian Public Relations Officer and the offer by the United States to fill this post. A United States officer has since taken up this appointment.

SEATO Military Expenditure I1128. The past procedures for the administration of SEATO joint military finance have proved cumbersome and inadequate, particularly in view of the expansion of the Military Secretariat and the establishment of the SEATO Military Planning Office. In examining the problem, whenever possible and appropriate, proposals have been made to take full advantage of existing civil SEATO facilities on a cost-sharing basis.

29. We have agreed to:—

(a)
Endorse the principle that the financial requirements of the SEATO Military Planning Office should be budgeted and controlled in accordance with SEATO civil procedure, suitably amended.
(b)
Approve the military budgets—
(i) 1st January, 1957–31st March, 1957 $3,575
(ii) 1st April, 1957–30th June, 1958 $88,320
(c)
Approve the appointment of an Accountant and Budget Officer, whose salary would be shared equally by the Civil and Military sides.

Future Work

30. An initial programme of work for the Permanent Military Planning Office has been drawn up and is attached.6

31. We have decided that future meetings will be held as follows:—

(a)
Seventh Military Advisers’ Conference, Bangkok, September, 1957.
(b)
Ad Hoc Intelligence Sub-committee meeting in Bangkok, November, 1957.

[Page 302]

A meeting of appropriate civil and military representatives is required to study the problem of quasi-overt aggression as recommended in paragraph 20 above.

Recommendations

32. The Military Advisers recommend that the Council:—

(a)
Note this progress report;
(b)
Take note that the SEATO Military Advisers have approved strategic concepts and intelligence studies on which detailed planning and preparations will be based. (Details of these approvals are contained in the Report of the Third Military Advisers Meeting at Baguio—MA 3rd M);
(c)
Take note of the principles and the procedure for the staging of SEATO military exercises which have been approved by the Military Advisers (paragraph 24);
(d)
Endorse the following specific recommendations of the Military Advisers—
(i)
The convening at an early date of a meeting of civil and military representatives to study the problem of quasi-overt aggression and to make recommendations to the Council for effective counter-action (paragraph 19);
(ii)
The principle that the financial requirements of the SEATO Military Planning Office should be budgeted and controlled in accordance with SEATO civil procedure, suitably amended (paragraph 29);
(iii)
The military budgets—
(i) 1st January, 1957–31st March, 1957 $3,575
(ii) 1st April, 1957–30th June, 1958 $88,320 (paragraph 29)
(iv)
The appointment of an Accountant and Budget Officer, whose salary would be shared equally by the Civil and Military sides (paragraph 29).

Annex B

SEATO MILITARY PLANNING STAFF

Initial Programme of Work

Item A

To draw up detailed plans, including logistics and facilities, from the strategic concept agreed by the Third Staff Planners Meeting for the defence of South East Asia including East Pakistan against an attack by Communist Chinese and Viet Minh forces.

[Page 303]

Item B

To draw up detailed plans, including logistics and facilities, from the strategic concept agreed by the Third Staff Planners Meeting for the defence of South East Asia against an attack by Viet Minh forces. In this connection, the military feasibility of holding Vientiane should be examined.

Item C

To develop further plans for the defence of West Pakistan after the strategic concept formulated by the Third Staff Planners Meeting has, by agreement of the Military Advisers, been related to the appropriate plans for the Middle East Area.

Item D

To examine the military measures required to counter the threat to the security of the Treaty Area through quasi-overt military action and the steps which should be taken for their implementation.

Item E

To develop a strategic concept for the defence of South East Asia against overt Communist aggression on the Philippines.

Item F

To examine and develop further studies in the field of non-material standardization, specially with regard to staff procedures and techniques; operations and training; and logistics.

Item G

The study of the defence of West Pakistan in relationship to the Middle East strategy. (Pakistan will prepare a position paper on this item.)

Item H

Naval study of the SEATO area including the control and protection of merchant shipping.

Item I

To study whether a requirement exists for the establishment of a SEATO Defence College and to estimate the initial and annual recurring cost of such a college, for submission to the Seventh Military Advisers’ Conference.

[Page 304]

Item J

To determine terms of reference for the Military Assistant to SEATO P.R.O., including a definition of his duties and relationships with the Chief, SEATO Military Planning Office and the SEATO P.R.O.

Item K

To examine the availability of existing maps of the SEATO area and to determine the suitability of those maps and scales for common reference for planning and intelligence studies.

  1. Source: Department of State, Conference Files: Lot 62 D 181, CF 839. Top Secret; SEATO. This report originally formed Appendix A 5 to MA 6th M (Report of the Sixth Meeting of the SEATO Military Advisers) dated March 10. MA 6th M has not been found in Department of State files.
  2. Detailed military and intelligence studies mentioned in this paper have not been found in Department of State files.
  3. MA 3rd M has not been found in Department of State files. The Baguio meeting was held in September 1956.
  4. Held at Melbourne January 17–21, 1956. The Military Advisers’ Report is attached to a note by Kirk, dated February 17, and designated KAR Ref.6/101. (Department of State, Conference Files: Lot 62 D 181, CF 656)
  5. This document is Appendix A 4 to MA 6th M dated 10th March, 1957, and Annex A to Progress Report to Council. [Footnote in the source text. Appendix A 4 is not printed. Annex A was not found attached.]
  6. Annex B to Progress Report to Council. [Footnote in the source text.]