167. Memorandum of a Conversation, Department of State, Washington, February 28, 1957, 3:05 p.m.1

SUBJECT

  • Israeli Withdrawal Declaration

PARTICIPANTS

  • The Secretary
  • L—Mr. Phleger
  • NEA—Mr. Rountree
  • IO—Mr. Wilcox
  • NE—Mr. Wilkins
  • Ambassador Abba Eban, Embassy of Israel
  • Mr. Reuven Shiloah, Minister Plenipotentiary, Embassy of Israel
  • Mr. Rafael, Israeli Delegation to 11th Session of the General Assembly

Prior to the meeting in the Secretary’s office, Ambassador Eban stated that the Israeli delegation would make a statement at this afternoon’s meeting of the General Assembly indicating Israel’s intention to make a declaration tomorrow of its plans for withdrawal.

Opening the discussion in the Secretary’s office, Ambassador Eban suggested that the group examine the revised text of the Israeli declaration as approved by his Government.2 In the course of the ensuing discussion a number of modifications and corrections were made in the text.

The Secretary suggested that a series of paragraphs summarizing the position of the United States as expressed in its February 11, 1957 aide-mémoire be replaced by a more general reference to the United States aide-mémoire. Ambassador Eban agreed.

The Secretary and Mr. Phleger suggested, and Ambassador Eban agreed, that a sentence referring to the statement by President Eisenhower of February 203 to the effect that the function of the UNEF is to assume non-belligerency in the area of the Straits of Tiran be deleted [Page 312] and replaced by a statement that it is generally recognized that UNEF’s function in this area includes the prevention of belligerent acts.

At Mr. Wilcox’s suggestion, Ambassador Eban also agreed to modify a paragraph which stated that “Interference by the use or threat of force with ships of the Israel flag . . . . in the Gulf of Aqaba . . . . will be regarded by Israel as an attack entitling her to exercise her inherent right of self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter . . . . ”4 The Secretary pointed out that Article 51 speaks of “armed attack” and not the threat of attack as a justification for self-defense. The language was changed accordingly.

Mr. Phleger noted that in the section dealing with Gaza, the declaration spoke of Israel’s expectation that the UN “will be the sole agency” to be utilized in Gaza for performing the functions set forth by the Secretary General in his statement of February 22. He suggested that the word “sole” be deleted as unnecessary. Ambassador Eban replied that his Government attached the greatest importance to this idea.

The Secretary pointed out that if the word “sole” were deleted, the remaining language (“will be the agency”) would imply the same meaning without attracting a contradictory statement from Egypt. Ambassador Eban agreed to consider this point further. [Note: The word “sole” was omitted from the declaration as read by Mrs. Meir in the Assembly, March 1.]5

The Secretary also expressed the hope that Israel would not take an extreme position which would exclude even one or two Egyptian civilians in some appropriate capacity under the UNEF. He pointed out that the situation might even require a few Israeli civilians. He hoped that Israel would not regard “sole” administration by the UN as a breaking point.

A number of other changes, largely of a clarifying or stylistic nature, were also agreed upon. Ambassador Eban undertook to have a revised copy of the Israeli declaration delivered to the Department later in the evening.6

After expressing the hope that they might soon see a text of the U.S. statement, Ambassador Eban stated that his Prime Minister intended to write to President Eisenhower pointing out that Israel is undertaking its withdrawal largely on the basis of the President’s statement of February 20 and the U.S. memorandum of February 11, [Page 313] and as an act of faith in the continued vigilance of the U.S. with regard to this situation. The Secretary said he believed he could assure the Ambassador of a prompt reply by the President.

There followed a brief discussion of the need for associating as many other governments as possible in general supporting statements. The Secretary noted also the need for bringing the Secretary General up to date and undertook to talk with him. He expressed the view that Israel should not expect any statement from the Secretary General beyond a brief remark referring to General Burns’ readiness to make the necessary arrangements for a speedy take-over.

[Attachment]

TEXT OF ISRAELI DECLARATION AS REVISED FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IN SECRETARY’S OFFICE, FEBRUARY 28

The Government of Israel is now in a position to announce its plans for full and prompt withdrawal from the Sharm-el-Sheikh area and the Gaza Strip, in compliance with Resolution I of February 2, 1957.

We have repeatedly stated that Israel has no interest in the strip of land overlooking the western coast of the Gulf of Aqaba. Our sole purpose has been to ensure that, on the withdrawal of Israeli forces, continued freedom of navigation will exist for Israel and international shipping in the Gulf of Aqaba and the Straits of Tiran. Such freedom of navigation is a vital national interest for Israel. But it is also of importance and legitimate concern to the maritime powers and to many States whose economies depend upon trade and navigation between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.

There has recently been an increasingly wide recognition that the Gulf of Aqaba comprehends international waters in which the right of free and innocent passage exists.

On February 11, 1957, the Secretary of State of the United States of America handed to the Ambassador of Israel in Washington a Memorandum on the subject of the Gulf of Aqaba and the Straits of Tiran.

This statement discusses the rights of nations in the Gulf of Aqaba, declares the readiness of the United States to exercise those rights on its own behalf, and to join with others in securing general recognition of those rights.

My Government has subsequently learnt with gratification that other leading maritime powers are prepared to subscribe to the doctrine set out in the U.S. Memorandum of February 11, and have a similar intention to exercise their rights of free and innocent passage in the Gulf and the Straits.

[Page 314]

The Memorandum conveyed by the United States to the Government of Israel on February 11 notes that, in the contemplation of the General Assembly’s Resolution (II) of February 2, 1957, units of UNEF will move into the Straits of Tiran area on Israel’s withdrawal. It is generally recognized that the function of UNEF in the Straits of Tiran area includes the prevention of belligerent acts.

In this connection my Government recalls the statements by the representative of the United States in the General Assembly on January 28 and February 2, 1957, with reference to the function of UNEF units which are to move into the Straits of Tiran area on Israel’s withdrawal. The statement of January 28, repeated on February 2, said:

“It is essential that units of the United Nations Emergency Force be stationed at the Straits of Tiran in order to achieve there the separation of Egyptian and Israeli land and sea forces. This separation is essential until it is clear that the non-exercise of any claimed belligerent rights has established in practice the peaceful conditions which must govern navigation in waters having such an international interest.”

My Government has been concerned with the situation which would arise if the UNEF, having taken up its position in the Straits of Tiran area for the purpose of assuring non-belligerency, were to be withdrawn, in conditions which might give rise to interference with free and innocent navigation, and, therefore, to the renewal of hostilities. Such a premature cessation of the precautionary measures taken by the U.N. for the prevention of belligerent acts would prejudice important international interests and threaten peace and security. Accordingly, my Government has sought and obtained an assurance, embodied in the Secretary-General’s Report of 26 February, 1957, that any proposal for the withdrawal of UNEF from the Gulf of Aqaba area would first come to the Advisory Committee, which represents the General Assembly in the implementation of its resolution of November 2, 1956. It is our understanding that this procedure would give the General Assembly an opportunity to ensure that no precipitate changes were made which would have the effect of increasing the possibility of belligerent acts. We have reason to believe that in such a discussion many members of the U.N. would be guided by the view expressed by Ambassador Lodge on February 2 in favor of maintaining UNEF in the Straits of Tiran until peaceful conditions were in practice assured.

In the light of these doctrines, policies and arrangements by the U.N. and the maritime powers, my Government is confident that free and innocent passage for international and Israel shipping will continue to be fully maintained after Israel’s withdrawal.

[Page 315]

It remains for me to formulate the policy of Israel both as a littoral State and as a country which intends to exercise its full rights of free passage in the Gulf of Aqaba and through the Straits of Tiran.

The Government of Israel believes that the Gulf of Aqaba comprehends international waters and that no nation has the right to prevent free and innocent passage in the Gulf and through the Straits giving access thereto, in accordance with the generally accepted definition of those terms in the law of the seas.

In its capacity as a littoral State, Israel will gladly offer port facilities to the ships of all nations and all flags exercising free passage in the Gulf of Aqaba. We have received with gratification the assurances of leading maritime powers that they foresee a normal and regular flow of traffic of all cargoes in the Gulf of Aqaba.

Israel will do nothing to impede free and innocent passage by ships of Arab countries bound to Arab ports, or to any other destination.

Israel is resolved on behalf of vessels of Israel registry to exercise the right of free and innocent passage and is prepared to join with others to secure universal respect of this right.

Israel will protect ships of its own flag exercising the right of free and innocent passage on the high seas and in international waters.

Interference, by armed force, with ships of Israel flag exercising free and innocent passage in the Gulf of Aqaba and through the Straits of Tiran, will be regarded by Israel as an attack entitling her to exercise her inherent right of self defence under Article 51 of the Charter, and to take all such measures as are necessary to ensure the free and innocent passage of her ships in the Gulf and in the Straits.

We make this announcement in accordance with the accepted principles of international law under which all states have an inherent right to use their forces to protect their ships and their rights against interference by armed force. My Government naturally hopes that this contingency will not occur.

In a public address on February 20, President Eisenhower stated: “We should not assume that if Israel withdraws, Egypt will prevent Israeli shipping from using the Suez Canal or the Gulf of Aqaba.” This declaration has weighed heavily with my Government in determining its action today.

Israel is now prepared to withdraw its forces from the Gulf of Aqaba and the Straits of Tiran in the confidence that there will be continued freedom of navigation for international and Israeli shipping in the Gulf of Aqaba and through the Straits of Tiran.

We propose that a meeting be held immediately between the Chief-of-Staff of the Israel Defence Army and the Commander of UNEF in order to arrange for the U.N. to take over its responsibilities in the Sharm-el-Sheikh area.

[Page 316]

Gaza

The Government of Israel announces that it is making a complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in accordance with the General Assembly’s Resolution (I) of February 2, 1957. It makes this announcement on the following assumptions:

(a)
that on its withdrawal the U.N. Forces will be deployed in Gaza and that the takeover of Gaza from the military and civilian control of Israel will be exclusively by the UNEF;
(b)
it is further Israel’s expectation that the U.N. will be the agency to be utilised for carrying out the functions enumerated by the Secretary General in Document A/PV/659,7 namely, “safeguarding life and property in the area by providing effective and efficient police protection; as will guarantee good civilian administration; as will assure maximum assistance to the U.N. refugee program; and as will protect and foster the economic development of the territory and its people.”
(c)
It is further Israel’s expectation that the above mentioned responsibility of the U.N. in the administration of Gaza will be maintained for a transitory period from the takeover until there is a peace settlement, to be sought as rapidly as possible, or a definitive agreement on the future of the Gaza Strip.

It is the position of Israel that if conditions are created in the Gaza Strip which indicate a return to the conditions of deterioration which existed previously, Israel would reserve its freedom to act to defend its rights.

Accordingly, we propose that a meeting be held immediately between the Chief-of-Staff of the Israel Defence Army and the Commander of UNEF in order to arrange for the U.N. to take over its responsibilities in the Gaza area.

For many weeks, amidst great difficulty, my Government has sought to ensure that on the withdrawal from the Sharm-el-Sheikh and the Gaza areas, circumstances would prevail which would prevent the likelihood of belligerent acts. Israel considers that there is no state of war between Israel and Egypt and will refrain, on the basis of reciprocity, from any hostile action against Egypt.

We record with gratitude the sympathetic efforts of many Governments and Delegations to help bring about a situation which would end the insecurity prevailing for Israel and her neighbors these many years. In addition to the considerations to which I have referred, we place our trust in the vigilant resolve of the international community that Israel, equally with all member States, enjoy its basic rights of freedom from fear of attack; freedom to sail the high seas and international [Page 317] waterways in peace; freedom to pursue its national destiny in tranquility without the constant peril which has surrounded it in recent years.

In this reliance we are embarking upon the course which I have announced today.

  1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, 674.84A/2–2857. Secret. Drafted by De Palma. The time of the meeting is from Dulles’ Appointment Book. (Princeton University Library, Dulles Papers)
  2. Not found in Department of State files.
  3. See footnote 4, Document 120.
  4. All ellipses in this document are in the source text.
  5. Brackets in the source text. For text of Meir’s address to the General Assembly on March 1 (U.N. doc. A/PV.666), see United States Policy in the Middle East, September 1956–July 1957, pp. 328–332.
  6. Attached to the source text and printed below.
  7. Reference is to remarks made by Hammarskjöld at the 659th plenary meeting of the General Assembly on February 22. (U.N. doc. A/PV.659)