331. Letter From the Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for
International Security Affairs (McGuire) to the Under Secretary of State (Hoover)1
Dear Mr. Hoover: Reference is made to your letter of 28
March 1956,2 in which you requested an analysis of the
amount and nature of arms which Israel would require to bring it into a
standoff position vis-à-vis the Arab countries. The attached memorandum
contains the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in which I concur.
Sincerely yours,
[Enclosure]
Memorandum From the Secretary of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
(Phillips) to the Secretary of Defense
(Wilson)3
Washington, April 25,
1956.
SUBJECT
- 1.
- This memorandum is in response to a memorandum by the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (ISA), dated 29 March 1956,4 subject as above, in which he requested an
analysis of the amounts and nature of arms which Israel would
have to receive to bring it to a standoff position vis-à-vis the
Arab countries.
- 2.
- In their memorandum for you, dated 30 March 1956,4 subject: “Request from the Government of;
Israel for the Sale of Military Equipment and Services,” the
Joint Chiefs of Staff informed you that Israel has greater
military strength than the Arab States, at this time, and will
retain this advantage for 12 to 24 months, depending on the
rapidity with which the Egyptians develop a capability to
utilize the arms they are receiving from the Soviet Bloc.
- 3.
- The Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered that, in the event
Israel initiates hostilities before midsummer 1956, she could,
in less
[Page 611]
than a month,
defeat the Egyptian Army in the Sinai Desert and contain the
ground forces of the other Arab States. After midsummer, the
balance of ground force superiority probably will begin to shift
to the Arabs. In the air, the Joint Chiefs of Staff consider
that a standoff position between the Arab States and Israel will
be reached by the summer of 1956 with the possibility that
either side could gain an important advantage if all-out
surprise attacks were undertaken. This will be true because of
the very limited number of airdromes on which the air strength
of each side is concentrated. The Joint Chiefs of Staff
recommend that the Department of State be so advised. However,
it should be pointed out to the Department of State that there
is no known formula or method whereby the military potentials of
nations or blocs of nations can be accurately assessed by
consideration of their military matériel assets alone.
Assessments of military strengths and capabilities are properly
called estimates and as such cannot result in certain
answers.
- 4.
- The Joint Chiefs of Staff will continue to make frequent
periodic estimates of the relative combat strengths and
capabilities of the Arab-Israeli nations, and will keep you
informed of their views.
- 5.
- The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, did not participate in
the action of the Joint Chiefs of Staff outlined in this
memorandum.
For the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
Richard H. Phillips5Captain,
USN