13. Telegram From Ambassador U. Alexis Johnson to the Department of State1
362. Eyes only Secretary and Robertson. In considering future course these talks and our broad objectives I offer following thought.
Present context, particularly in public mind is that talks are in nature conference with definitive ending at some point in time. It seems to me some of difficulties inherent this context would be obviated if and when we reach “other practical matters” we could gradually shift to concept of contact between Wang and myself being of indefinite duration in time and intermittent in nature to be utilized at request either side.
Although possibly presenting some new difficulties I think this concept would best meet our broad objective without difficulties inherent in concept attempting prolong present series of talks.
I realize this is largely question of form rather than substance but believe it important.
What I have in mind is that at some point in discussion “other practical matters” I would attempt obtain agreement that instead of meeting more or less regularly with recesses of varying lengths we would meet only at request of other to be transmitted through Consulates General here.
There could be gradual press preparation for this and I would take advantage any opportunity prepare Wang.
While this has advantages must recognize retains disadvantages present situation in heavy public attention whenever Wang and I would appear here. However do not perceive any practicable alternative as long as Wang and I remain point of contact.2
- Source: Department of State, Central Files, 611.93/8–955. Secret.↩
-
Telegram 439 to Geneva, August 10, drafted and signed personally by Dulles, replied to Johnson’s message as follows:
“While it is useful to be thinking ahead we doubt that it is useful to attempt now to crystallize our thinking.” (Ibid., 611.93/8–1055)
↩