Office of the Historian

396.1 LO/10–154: Telegram

The Acting Secretary of State to the Embassy in Vietnam1

top secret
niact
Washington, October 1, 1954—12:42 p.m.

1327. Limit distribution. Paris pass Heath. There follows text message agreed between Smith–LaChambre September 30 for transmittal respective representatives Saigon. Note that this text, written by US, is considerably less definite concerning Buu Loc than was suggested by French in meeting on twenty ninth reported fifth paragraph Deptel 1296 Saigon repeated Paris 1175.2 US view is as stated preceding telegram [Page 2111] that not useful weaken arguments for support Diem by disclosure consideration of successor and that Diem deserves breathing spell to take advantage “additional support”. In our view latter phrase includes French promises to support Diem. Saigon authorized give text following message Daridan, omitting reference Deptel, although French have stated will transmit independently.

“In addition to our instruction concerning support of Diem (Deptel 1297)3 we believe prudent bear in mind possibility that despite our best efforts he may be unable maintain strong government due opposition factors beyond his control, or in spite of our support.

As one possible approach this contingency, French have suggested that Bao Dai be recommended choose a ‘delegate general’ who could be Buu Loc. He would be empowered by Bao Dai go Saigon form government national union himself, including Diem or to select personality capable of forming such government.

We would be unwilling to in any way prejudice Diem’s effort, which is fully backed by French and ourselves by allowing it be known we considering successor. Therefore, purpose this message to obtain your reaction French suggestion. Believe we should base our judgment of Diem’s success henceforth on basis fair and reasonable chance with wholehearted US–French backing in order he be able take advantage additional support.”

Smith
  1. Drafted by Hoey of PSA. Also sent niact to Paris as telegram 1195 and to London as Tosec 16.↩
  2. For Tosec 7 to London, Sept. 30, also sent to Saigon as telegram 1296 and to Paris as telegram 1175, see p. 2098.↩
  3. For Tosec 8 to London, Sept. 30, also sent to Saigon as telegram 1297 and to Paris as telegram 1176, see p. 2100.↩