340.1 AG/3–2653

Memorandum by the Assistant Secretary of State for United Nations Affairs (Hickerson) and the Legal Adviser (Phleger) to the Secretary of State1

  • Subject:
  • United States Policy Concerning Proposed Covenants on Human Rights

In accordance with our conversations concerning United States policy for the next session of the UN” Commission on Human Rights which opens in Geneva on April 7, it is proposed that Mrs. Oswald B. Lord point out in the Commission that in the present stage of international relations it is the opinion of the United States that there are more effective ways to promote the human rights objectives of the UN Charter than through the drafting of the proposed Covenants on Human Rights; that a greater degree of general acceptance of goals in this field must be achieved before it will be useful to draft treaties of the scope of the proposed Covenants; and that the Commission on Human Rights should accordingly give attention and emphasis to means other than the Covenants for making progress toward the human rights goals of the UN Charter. (Tab A)

Mrs. Lord is asked to point out to the Commission on Human Rights that the United States attaches great importance to the achievement of the human rights goals of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and accordingly is prepared to support at this session of the Commission the following means for the achievement of these goals:

1.
The institution of world-wide surveys by the Commission on Human Rights on various aspects of human rights, through the assistance of a rapporteur appointed by the Commission. The first two subjects suggested are freedom of religion and the right to a fair trial. The rapporteur would consult non-governmental organizations as well as governments and the Specialized Agencies for relevant data for submission [Page 1557] to the Commission. The report of the rapporteur would be considered in the Commission on Human Rights and general recommendations are anticipated relating to the particular subject discussed. The procedure proposed here is similar to that already undertaken by the UN Economic and Social Council in the field of freedom of information.
2.
Annual reports on developments in the field of human rights from each Member Government of the United Nations, prepared in each instance with the assistance of a national advisory committee, such reports to be considered in the Commission at the time the survey reports of the proposed rapporteur are submitted. The proposed national advisory committee on human rights would be appointed by the Secretary of State and would be available on a consultative basis to assist in the preparation of the annual reports to be prepared under the general supervision of the Department of State.
3.
The establishment of advisory services on specific aspects of human rights defined by the UN Economic and Social Council, such services to be in the form of experts going to countries requesting the services, scholarships and fellowships being provided for training abroad and arrangements for seminars. These services would be along the lines of other advisory services now being provided in the United Nations in the economic, social and public administration fields. (Tab B)

Recommendation:

It is recommended that you approve the proposals in this memorandum. Mrs. Lord will be given instructions along the lines set forth in this memorandum for the next session of the Commission. Mrs. Lord has reviewed the proposals in this memorandum and considers them satisfactory.

[Attachment 1]

Statement of Policy for 1953 Session of Commission on Human Rights

The United States Representative should point out that in the present stage of international relations it is the opinion of the United States that there are more effective ways to promote the human rights objectives of the UN Charter than through the drafting of the proposed Covenants on Human Rights; that a greater degree of general acceptance of goals in this field must be achieved before the time will be ripe for the proposed Covenants; and that the Commission should accordingly give attention and emphasis to means other than the Covenants for making progress toward the human rights goals of the UN Charter.

The United States Representative should point out that the United States attaches great importance to the achievement of the human rights goals of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and accordingly is prepared to support at this session [Page 1558] of the Commission the following means for the achievement of these goals:

(a)
The institution of world-wide surveys by the Commission on Human Rights on various aspects of human rights, through the assistance of a rapporteur appointed by the Commission.
(b)
Annual reports on developments in the field of human rights from each Member Government of the United Nations, prepared in each instance with the assistance of an advisory committee, such reports to be considered in the Commission at the time the survey reports of the proposed rapporteur are submitted to the Commission.
(c)
The establishment of advisory services on specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council, such services to be in the form of experts going to countries requesting the services, scholarships and fellowships being provided for training abroad and arrangements for seminars.

In view of instructions from the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council that the Commission proceed at this session with its work on the proposed Covenants, it is expected that the Commission will do so. The United States Representative should urge, however, that adequate time also be set aside at this session for the consideration of the steps outlined above for the promotion of human rights in the United Nations. The United States Representative should as a loyal member of the Commission participate in a technical capacity in such drafting or redrafting of the proposed Covenants that may be undertaken at this session. In view of the United States change in policy with respect to the proposed Covenants, the United States Representative should not insist on drafting proposals as in the past when we considered it necessary to bring the provisions of the proposed Covenants in line with our own constitutional law and practice. The United States role should be one of helpfulness but not one of pressing our views upon the Commission. Detailed technical instructions on the draft Covenants have accordingly been prepared simply as a guide to the United States Representative in a technical participation in the drafting of the proposed Covenants at this session of the Commission.

[Page 1559]

[Attachment 2]

Position Paper Prepared in the Office of United Nations Economic and Social Affairs for the United States Delegation to the Ninth Session of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights

restricted
CHR/D/13/53

Advisory Services in the Promotion of Human Rights

problem

To determine the position of the United States Representative with regard to (1) the proposal of the Secretary General that advisory services be rendered by the United Nations to countries and territories which may request them in the promotion of human rights (Doc. E/1900, par. 56), and (2) the proposal on technical assistance in draft resolution K in Annex I of the 1952 Report of the Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities (Doc. E/CN.4/670).

recommendations

I.
The United States Representative should propose or support the adoption of a resolution on advisory services in the Commission on Human Rights to request the Economic and Social Council to ask the General Assembly:
A.
To authorize the Secretary General:
1.
Subject to the directions of the Economic and Social Council, to make provision for the following services, with the cooperation of the specialized agencies where appropriate, and in consultation with non-governmental organizations having consultative status, in specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council:
(a)
For the appointment of experts to provide advisory services at the request of governments which show the need for them in specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council;
(b)
To enable suitably qualified persons to observe, and familiarize themselves with, the experience and practice of other countries on specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council;
(c)
To enable suitably qualified persons who cannot receive professional training in their own country on specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council, to receive appropriate training in foreign countries having the necessary facilities for such training; and
(d)
To plan and conduct seminars on specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council.
2.
To include in his budgetary estimates of the United Nations the sums necessary for carrying out an effective operational program based on the provision of the above services.
B.
To instruct the Secretary General to undertake the performance of the services as provided in A.1 above, in agreement with governments concerned, on the basis of requests received from governments and in accordance with the following policies:
1.
The kind of service to be rendered to each country under A.1(a) shall be acceptable to the government concerned and shall be determined in consultation with that government;
2.
The selection of the persons under A.1(b) and (c) shall be made by the Secretary General on the basis of proposals received from governments, which shall indicate their preferences with regard to host countries, and shall be acceptable to the host countries;
3.
The amount of services and the conditions under which they shall be decided by the Secretary General with due regard to the greater needs of the under-developed areas and in conformity with the principle that each requesting government shall be expected to assume responsibility, as far as possible, for all or a major part of the expenses connected with the services furnished to it, either by making a contribution in cash, or in the form of services for the purposes of the program being carried out.
C.
To request the Secretary General to report regularly to the Commission on Human Rights and as appropriate to the Commission on the Status of Women on the measures which he takes in compliance with the terms of this resolution, and to request these Commissions to formulate recommendations from time to time concerning the continued action required to carry on the essential advisory services in the specific aspects of human rights defined by the Economic and Social Council.
II.
The United States Representative should propose or support a recommendation from the Commission to the Economic and Social Council that it define the following specific aspects of human rights to which the above advisory services would be applicable:
(a)
Improvement of judicial procedures.
(b)
Establishment and improvement of techniques of mass information media, including such facilities as news agencies.
(d)
2 Increased participation in national and community civic affairs, especially for women recently granted the vote.
(e)
Abolishing slavery and institutions and practices akin thereto.
(f)
Legislative measures for the prevention of discrimination and the protection of minorities.
III.
The United States Representative should reserve the position of the United States with respect to the amount that should be provided in the regular UN budget for the proposed advisory services. It is the United States view that this proposed program should not in any event exceed the costs of the current UN advisory services in public administration (which amount to about $145,000). The United States Representative may indicate this maximum figure to the Commission if there is an indication in the Commission that a larger budget amount is anticipated.
[Page 1561]

discussion

The Secretary General in Doc. E/1900 suggests that “assistance could be given for example, in the formulation of basic laws concerning human rights, in the establishment of judicial organs and in the drafting of rules of judicial procedure, in the establishment of institutions of self-government, in raising the status of women, in preventing discrimination and protecting minorities, in abolishing slavery and institutions and practices akin thereto, where such problems exist.” The Secretary General at the same time also suggests that the United Nations might assist individual countries and territories in the promotion of economic, social and cultural rights. The inclusion of the latter field of activity in the promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms is of doubtful validity since there are separate technical assistance programs going forward with respect to economic, social and cultural matters.

The United States Representative should urge that the scope of this program be limited to specific aspects of human rights (as enumerated above under recommendation II) defined by the Economic and Social Council rather than the general subject of “human rights.”

The program recommended in this paper is preferable to the recommendation of the Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities (a) that organizations participating in the technical assistance and other programs now providing aid or advice at the request of Member States, give sympathetic consideration to requests which governments may submit for such technical assistance in connection with measures aimed at the eradication of prejudice or discrimination or at the protection of minorities, (b) a technical assistance program to assist solely “in the eradication of prejudice or discrimination and in the protection of minorities,” and (c) such services to include “educational programs designed to combat prejudice and discrimination.”

The recommendations of this paper reflect to a considerable extent the wording and structure of General Assembly Resolution 418 (V), concerning advisory social welfare services, approved December 1, 1950.

It is assumed that the financing of the program herein envisaged would be under the regular budget of the United Nations, analogous to the regular budget activities of the United Nations in the field of social welfare and public administration. For administrative purposes it is assumed that the proposed program in human rights would be brought within the administrative jurisdiction of the United Nations Technical Assistance Administration. Such an arrangement exists on a reasonably harmonious basis at the present time between UNTAA and the Social Affairs Division of the UN Secretariat. In general, the [Page 1562] theory is that UNTAA is responsible only for administrative arrangements but looks to the Division of Social Affairs for substantive judgments.

background

The support of the United States for the advisory services program outlined in the recommendations of this paper is particularly important as illustrative of United States support for the promotion of human rights in ways more effective than the proposed Covenants on Human Rights. It is the United States view that the United Nations should no longer press ahead with the proposed Covenants since treaties of the broad scope of the Covenants are not the most effective way to promote human rights at the present time. The United Nations should instead now concentrate on ways to achieve a wider acceptance throughout the world of the human rights goals of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The provision of advisory services in the specified aspects of human rights enumerated in recommendation II is one effective way to promote the human rights goals of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is expected that there will be wide support for a program of advisory services in this field in the Commission on Human Rights as well as later in the Economic and Social Council and the General Assembly.

  1. Drafted by the Officer in Charge, UN Cultural and Human Rights Affairs (Simsarian). This memorandum was cleared with the geographic bureaus, a normal procedure with many questions affecting U.S. policy at the United Nations (each bureau had an UN adviser who acted in a liaison capacity between each bureau and the Bureau of UN Affairs). In this particular instance the clearance of the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs was rather ambiguously qualified, the clearance being conditioned upon views expressed in a memorandum of Mar. 20, 1953 by the Assistant Secretary for Inter-American Affairs (Cabot) to the Director of the Office of UN Economic and Social Affairs (Kotschnig), regarding specific items on the agenda of the Human Rights Commission. Assistant Secretary Cabot seems to have been concerned that the Latin American states might be criticized for violations of human rights if certain procedures were adopted. Cabot wrote: “We should avoid, as far as possible, procedures which are likely to result in a situation where countries which are basically anxious to cooperate with the UN would receive a substantial share of the criticism, while the countries which are the major violators of human rights would be able to avoid much, if any, criticism.” (340.1 AG/3–2053)
  2. There is no sub-paragraph c in the source text.