OCB files, lot 61 D 385, “Prestige Project”

Memorandum by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs (Phillips) to the Operations Coordinator in the Office of the Under Secretary of State (Radius)

secret

You will recall that the OCB was recently invited by the Department to consider problems in foreign opinion raised by the activities of Senator McCarthy.

An officer connected with the IES1 attended a meeting in Boston, April 26–30, of the Sixth Annual Conference of the National Association of Foreign Student Advisers. Attached is a report made to me on aspects of the above problem which were raised there.

I believe that action on the original OCB item was not clearly assigned. The attached information may be of use to anyone who is pursuing the subject.

Joseph B. Phillips

[Attachment]

Memorandum Prepared in the International Educational Exchange Service of the Bureau of Public Affairs2

secret

Sixth Annual Conference of the National Association of Foreign Student Advisers Held in Boston, April 26–30, 1954

The issue of “McCarthyism” is destroying respect for and confidence in the United States abroad according to the informal reports of many foreign student advisers attending this Conference from colleges and universities throughout the country.

American exchange professors and students abroad report that no single issue involving the United States receives greater attention than the queries they receive from their associates in foreign countries concerning “McCarthyism”. Heretofore, racial discrimination in the United States has been the focal point of many searching questions put to Americans abroad. The racial issue has been relegated to a role of lesser importance in view of the expressed [Page 1558] concern over this new issue, according to the foreign student advisers.

An officer of NAFSA indicated that there is strong evidence of the impact of this issue on the thinking of most foreign students here in the United States. It was intimated that there is scarcely a meeting or a gathering of foreign students during which this question is not discussed. The concern of these foreign students is expressed in a variety of ways: Some express a fear of “McCarthyism” and indicate that it represents the beginning of a drastic change in U.S. foreign policy. For example, they see the early objectives of the Point IV and Mutual Assistance Programs gradually being de-emphasized. This leads to the feeling that the United States is concerned only with nations which subscribe to her own political and economic points of view. Many foreign students are fearful and disturbed that Senator McCarthy might one day be elected President.

This same officer of NAFSA whose work with foreign students takes him into nearly every state also reports that on a great many American college and university campuses “McCarthyism” is a frequent and favorite topic for discussion by student forums. At one such forum in the state of Washington, for example, he noted that where the average attendance of between 35 and 40 would be expected, over 400 students and faculty alike turned out for the discussion. Likewise, in a Canadian university in British Columbia the topic was discussed in a student forum. College newspapers likewise carry editorials and special articles on the subject. It was observed that in the student forums foreign students take an active part and often contribute to the college newspaper articles.

[Page 1559]

Generally, most foreign students are confused and do not know how to interpret what they see or hear on the subject of “McCarthyism”. As a result, they are inclined to be critical and outspoken. Those who have seriously thought about this issue see it as a “symptom” or “rash” indicating a general trend toward isolationism. Because of this trend, the majority of these foreign students are fearful of the outcome which this may have on American foreign policy.3

  1. International Educational Exchange Service located in the Bureau of Public Affairs.
  2. The identity of the drafting officer is not indicated on the source text.
  3. Attached to the source text is a memorandum from Radius to Deputy Under Secretary of State Robert Murphy, dated May 18, 1954, which reads as follows:

    “The problem referred to by Mr. Phillips in the attached memorandum (Tab A) was that raised by the cable from Ambassador Dillon (Tab B) in a follow-up of the ‘Prestige’ Study undertaken last year.

    “I understand this problem was discussed at a [Operations Coordinating] Board luncheon and, although no formal action assignment was made, the problem was referred to Mr. Streibert.

    Recommendation:

    “You may wish to bring the attached information to Mr. Streibert’s attention in connection with whatever follow-up he may be taking in connection with the Dillon cable.”

    The Phillips memorandum referred to is printed above. The “Dillon cable” was telegram 3623 from Paris, Mar. 31, 1954, p. 1552. There is no indication from the materials examined for this compilation that any further action was taken on this matter or on the “Prestige” study of 1953 referred to above.