800.2553/7–2953
Memorandum of Conversation, by the Deputy Director of the Office of International Materials Policy (Armstrong)
- Subject:
- Foreign Petroleum Policy and the Anti-Trust Proceedings
- Participants:
- Mr. James Terry Duce—ARAMCO
- Mr. Waugh—E
- Mr. Armstrong—OMP
Mr. Duce came to call on Mr. Waugh, to discuss general foreign petroleum problems. The net effect of his suggestions and comments was as follows:
- 1.
- The world petroleum industry needs continual expansion if the amount of consumption predicted for 1975 by the Paley Commission Report1 is to be possible.
- 2.
- The only place where such expansion can occur is in the Middle East.
- 3.
- The Middle Eastern area is characterized by weak and unstable governments, and all questions of foreign petroleum operations in the area must be handled with delicacy and care.
- 4.
- The anti-trust suit has been injurious to the positions of the companies abroad and has been of potential danger to United States national security.
- 5.
- There should be a governmental commission, for which the oil companies would be prepared to do the necessary staff work, which should decide what reforms the companies would make. Acceptance by the companies of these reforms should make it possible to call off the anti-trust suit.
- 6.
- Such a commission was proposed by Mr. Duce last fall, and obtained some support within the Government, but has apparently been dropped by the present Administration.
- 7.
- The new Foreign Economic Policy Commission of seventeen members,2 which is the subject of current legislation, should be called upon to do this task, so that security of operation for the oil companies could be assured.
In the course of Mr. Duce’s presentation, Mr. Waugh commented to the effect that he was certain that the Attorney General had every intention of conducting the anti-trust suit proceedings in such a way that foreign policy problems are fully recognized. Mr. Waugh said that he would be glad to pass on to the Administrative Assistant to the President Mr. Duce’s suggestion that the Foreign Economic Policy Commission look into the oil issue, but in making this comment Mr. Waugh pointed out that the main problem the Commission would have to consider was that of general commercial policy, and that it would have very little time in which to do its work, since its report would be due in March 1954 and it does not yet exist as an entity. Mr. Armstrong commented that he had examined in some detail, during the fall of 1952, the amount of work which it would be necessary for any government petroleum policy commission to do if it were to get a clear picture of the issues and problems requiring resolution. It was his conclusion that it would be impossible for the proposed Foreign Economic Policy Commission or a subcommittee of it to get the work done properly within the allotted time.3
- Regarding the Paley Commission Report, see footnote *, p. 1319.↩
- The Commission was established as a result of the enactment on Aug. 7, 1953, of the Trade Agreements Extension Act of 1953. For the text of the act, see 67 Stat. 472. For documentation regarding the establishment of the Commission, which was headed by Clarence B. Randall, see pp. 49 ff.↩
- Attached to the source text was a memorandum of July 31 from Armstrong to Assistant Secretary Waugh, in which Armstrong stated that, if a commission or committee were to be set up, “it should be confined to Government people, because the problem cannot be comprehended properly except with the use of a good deal of classified information.” While Armstrong pointed out that in some respects coordination of foreign petroleum policy was already being handled quite well within the government, he thought that at some point it might be a good idea “for a formal governmental arrangement to be made to develop an explicit policy.” He added, however, that he did not think that time had yet arrived. In the margin of this memorandum was Waugh’s handwritten note that he agreed with this view.↩